DUST Search - Large Missile Turrets

All Channels

General Discussions

Large Missile Turrets

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Infamous Erich Inf4m0us 102	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:30:00 - [1] - Quote Great for Amour tanks besides that killing infantry is pretty hard with only 1.5 splash radius i think we need that buffed a tiny bit, a large missile shouldn't have the radius of a flaylock. Closed Beta Vet Shield Tank Vet Bring back my Sagaris
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1405	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:32:00 - [2] - Quote I love the new missile turrets but yea the splash needs to be just a simigin higher say 1.5m to 1.75 would be allot better Its gone from suck .....to blow level 1 forum warrior
Infamous Erich Inf4m0us 102	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:35:00 - [3] - Quote think about how many kills you can get with a blaster clip vs a missile clip cause in 1 full clip sometimes its hard to get 1 infantry kill Closed Beta Vet Shield Tank Vet Bring back my Sagaris
pegasis prime BIG BAD W0LVES 1406	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:38:00 - [4] - Quote the most iv got of of 1 clip in my missiles is 4 kills and they were all huddled next to a null cannon. missiles are great for area denial and really accurate at 180m to 230m roughly. Its gone from suck .....to blow level 1 forum warrior
Infamous Erich Inf4m0us 102	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:41:00 - [5] - Quote yeah i manged to get a 3 kills not 4 thats pretty nice Closed Beta Vet Shield Tank Vet Bring back my Sagaris
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. Renegade Alliance 4071	Posted - 2013.12.11 11:44:00 - [6] - Quote It -was- 2.5 meters. Unfortunately, if you want to kill infantry, you have to use small turrets now. They balanced Large Missiles against vehicles, which is pretty good on that aspect; but for an anti-infantry weapon the missiles would need a larger splash radius and some arc. Vehicle vs Vehicle - they're awesome. Vehicle vs Infantry - eh, not so much. forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m= (Frames)1544109 (Advertisement)1556863 (Packs)1570030 (Lag Hunt) 1570201
Infamous Erich Inf4m0us 102	Posted - 2013.12.11 20:19:00 - [7] - Quote i really think they should be around 2.5 even 3.0 radius.... they are LARGE MISSILES how can they have flaylock radius right? Closed Beta Vet Shield Tank Vet Bring back my Sagaris
Krom Ganesh Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 847	Posted - 2013.12.11 20:27:00 - [8] - Quote Infamous Erich wrote: i really think they should be around 2.5 even 3.0 radius.... they are LARGE MISSILES how can they have flaylock radius right? Shaped charges !
Skihids Unkn0wn Killers Renegade Alliance 2509	Posted - 2013.12.11 20:34:00 - [9] - Quote Infamous Erich wrote: i really think they should be around 2.5 even 3.0 radius.... they are LARGE MISSILES how can they have flaylock radius right? You can choose a shaped charge that concentrates its damage for anti-armor effect, or a general radial bast to kill lightly armored targets in a larger radius. Large missiles seem to be shaped charges.
Pokey Dravon OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention 1197	Posted - 2013.12.11 20:39:00 - [10] - Quote Infamous Erich wrote: think about how many kills you can get with a blaster clip vs a missile clip cause in 1 full clip sometimes its hard to get 1 infantry kill Well missiles are designed for alpha strikes, not sustained DPS. Alpha strikes are great for big, easy to hit targets with a lot of HP. Sustained DPS is best for hitting small, harder to hit targets like infantry. So really it is working as intended and I don't think it should be changed. However if they wanted to implement a large missile turret variant that had less alpha, bigger splash radius, and a larger magazine, I'd be in support of that. ADS Reports - Defining Racial Themes

TheAmazing FlyingPig Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 4981	Posted - 2013.12.11 20:43:00 - [11] - Quote Skihids wrote: Infamous Erich wrote: i really think they should be around 2.5 even 3.0 radius.... they are LARGE MISSILES how can they have flaylock radius right? You can choose a shaped charge that concentrates its damage for anti-armor effect, or a general radial bast to kill lightly armored targets in a larger radius. Large missiles seem to be shaped charges. Looks like we have our first missile turret variant. Never forget How to fix the Logi


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.