| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Funkmaster Whale
Fatal Absolution
1267
   |
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches.
Let me play you the song of my people!
|
Alena Ventrallis
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
215
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches.
Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. |
Jason Pearson
3209
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical.
1.9 equals 1.90 not 1.09, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense.
Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising).
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
5816
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:45:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising).
It makes perfect sense.
Patches are done like this all the time.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Gallente FW - 'Turalyon'
|
Niuvo
NECROM0NGERS
Covert Intervention
848
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
They better put time on the other roles besides med frames. jeez. |
Jason Pearson
3209
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:46:00 -
[6] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time.
I have never seen such absurdity, it should be patch 1.07 coming then, not 1.7.
LEARN TO MATHS GOD.
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Roy Ventus
Foxhound Corporation
General Tso's Alliance
643
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
Since everything's been getting the "2.0" thrown behind it(Marketplace 2.0, FW 2.0, Planetary Conquest 2.0) I'm going to assume 2.0 will at least be a huge expansion or at least huge in potential rather than just coding.
I'm expecting 2.0 to drop PC 2.0 and the Player Market on us as well. I would say "idk I doubt it" but CCP proved me wrong when they added the FW 2.0 in 1.7 o,o.
"There once was a time when there wasn't a Roy Ventus and it wasn't much of a time at all."
|
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers
Negative-Feedback
2192
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time.
Logging in to specifically state that Arkena is correct. This is how its been done for every single online game i've played.
1.1 =/= 1.10... you would read those aloud as one point one and one point ten. Has nothing to do with math Jason, even though you were most likely trolling, there are people who read those kinds of posts and don't know better :p |
SoTarian PoParrazi
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
420
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:
1.9 equals 1.90 not 1.09, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense.
Alena Ventrallis wrote: It isn't mathematical.
n+ÅS¦¦Gùò GÇ+GÇ+ GùòS¦¦n++ - Let's make a contract!
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
2437
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 equals 1.90 not 1.09, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising).
Hence "it isn't mathematical".
1.9 =/= 1.90 in software. It's Version.Patch, so an 11th patch will show as +.11 not +1.1
No.
|
|
|
Aero Yassavi
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3708
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 equals 1.90 not 1.09, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising).
You are mistaken. Update 1.9 is not 1.90 nor is it 1.09. In fact, Update 1.9 is not even a number. It is Dust 514: Uprising 1.9. As in, Dust 514: Uprising version 1, sub-version 9. If we are to assume there are more than 9 sub-versions to version 1, then the next update would be Dust 514: Uprising version 1, sub-version 10.
Amarr faithful, join PIE Inc, the oldest EVE/Dust Amarr loyal corporation!
Amarr Victor!
|
Zero Harpuia
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
1318
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 22:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time. I have never seen such absurdity, it should be patch 1.07 coming then, not 1.7. LEARN TO MATHS GOD.
You are an idiot.
When the date is March Ninth, Two thousand, did it change to April First, Two thousand? Same basic principle.
Each number is IT'S OWN NUMBER. It isn't a decimal system, they are just separated by periods. Learn to read dammit.
EDIT: Seeing as everybody else also corrected him, I feel it appropriate to say DOGPILE ON THE DIPSHIT!
Shields as Weapons
|
Aero Yassavi
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3708
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:01:00 -
[13] - Quote
For the unenlightened who insist that update 1.9 is the mathematical number 1.9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning
You learn something new everyday.
Amarr faithful, join PIE Inc, the oldest EVE/Dust Amarr loyal corporation!
Amarr Victor!
|
Judge Rhadamanthus
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
887
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:03:00 -
[14] - Quote
10 comes after 9. It can just keep going 1.10 - 1.11........
Everything Dropship youtube channel
my Community Spotlight
|
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet
Top Men.
255
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:04:00 -
[15] - Quote
ITT: one subtle troll ruses a lot of nerds |
Gorra Snell
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
296
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:05:00 -
[16] - Quote
Here's the most relevant part of that article, if you don't want to follow the link:
Incrementing sequences
There are two schools of thought regarding how numeric version numbers are incremented: Most free software packages treat numbers as a continuous stream, therefore a free software or open source product may have version numbers 1.7.0, 1.8.0, 1.8.1, 1.9.0, 1.10.0, 1.11.0, 1.11.1, 1.11.2, etc. An example of such a software package is MediaWiki. However, many programs treat version numbers in another way, generally as decimal numbers, and may have version numbers such as 1.7, 1.8, 1.81, 1.82, 1.9, etc. In software packages using this way of numbering 1.81 is the next minor version after 1.8. Maintenance releases (i.e. bug fixes only) would generally be denoted as 1.81a, 1.81b, etc.
RDVs are a failed experiment - can't we just remove them from the game?
|
Aero Yassavi
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3708
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:07:00 -
[17] - Quote
Sigberct Amni wrote:ITT: one subtle troll ruses a lot of nerds
Trolls only like to think they rused someone. Correcting others is not at all rage inducing as trolls like to believe.
Amarr faithful, join PIE Inc, the oldest EVE/Dust Amarr loyal corporation!
Amarr Victor!
|
CrotchGrab 360
Commando Perkone
Caldari State
426
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:08:00 -
[18] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time.
no it doesn't
it would only go from 1.9 to 1.91 or 1.9X if it was a very small update or tweak.
like flash player or something hot-fixing or releasing a patch for bugs or improving or adding just one minor feature
Full releases would make it go from 1.9 to 2.0
You've Been Hit By
You've Been Struck By
A Smooth Criminal
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
Turalyon Alliance
5819
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
CrotchGrab 360 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time. no it doesn't it would only go from 1.9 to 1.91 or 1.9X if it was a very small update or tweak. like flash player or something hot-fixing or releasing a patch for bugs or improving or adding just one minor feature Full releases would make it go from 1.9 to 2.0. I'm sure patches would go 1.91 or 1.9.1 but not 1.9 then 1.10, not in DUST, not on the PS3. this isn't a web media player, it's a video game
No, it would go from 1.9 to 1.10, to 1.11, 1.12, etc.
Level 5 Forum Warrior
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
Gallente FW - 'Turalyon'
|
Sigberct Amni
Goonfeet
Top Men.
255
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
Aero Yassavi wrote:Sigberct Amni wrote:ITT: one subtle troll ruses a lot of nerds Trolls only like to think they rused someone. Correcting others is not at all rage inducing as trolls like to believe.
Maybe, but I'm still feeling pretty smug about my last comment and this one so I reject your logic and substitute my own. |
|
|
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions
DARKSTAR ARMY
3973
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time.
Program incremental updates do not follow the rules of mathematics.
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
Jason Pearson
3215
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
YOU GUYS ARE SO DUMB OMG, SRS YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO MATHS
(Zero, you seem upset?)
King of the Forums // Vehicle Specialist for Hire
Laugh at the idiots crying about four BPOs being removed erryday, lul
|
Raden Yuno
4
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 23:43:00 -
[23] - Quote
You know the games doing bad when they would rather have an argument about version numbers.
Escaping Freedom a Short Story
|
Spaceballs The Profile
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 01:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
Spaceballs the patch system....and the search for more content. |
Spaceballs The Profile
Royal Uhlans
Amarr Empire
8
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 01:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:YOU GUYS ARE SO DUMB OMG, SRS YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO MATHS
(Zero, you seem upset?)
LONESTAAAAARRRR!!
....
....
....Evil forum rage will always persist because maths are dumb  |
nor asha
Turbo Bros inc.
51
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 01:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:
1.9 equals 1.90 not 1.09, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense.
Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising).
You're wrong |
nor asha
Turbo Bros inc.
51
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 01:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jason Pearson wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:Alena Ventrallis wrote:Funkmaster Whale wrote:Based on the current decimal system of patching, 1.8 will be early January, 1.9 early Feb, and 2.0?
Do we expect 2.0 to be the first major expansion? I'm thinking 2.0 will come out in May while we sit on 1.9 for two to three months giving them a longer dev cycle for some actual content (PC 2.0? PvE?)
Unless of course they start trolling is with 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 patches. Patches don't work like that. After 1.9, it would roll over to 1.10, 1.11, etc. The first number is the version of the software. The second is what patch to the software it is on. It isn't mathematical. 1.9 = 1.90, so it rolling over to 1.10 makes no sense. Expect 2.0 to be a new version (no longer Uprising). It makes perfect sense. Patches are done like this all the time. I have never seen such absurdity, it should be patch 1.07 coming then, not 1.7. LEARN TO MATHS GOD.
Learn to not math |
Patrick57
Fatal Absolution
1926
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 02:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
I ******* HATE ALL THIS DAMN MATH!
When I'm depressed, I cut myself......A BIG SLICE OF CHOCOLATE CAKE!
|
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order
Amarr Empire
782
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 03:08:00 -
[29] - Quote
It will roll over to 2.0 and be called "WTF DID WE DO?" And promptly be moved to PC with a subscription and proper revenue to fund proper development.
Do your part. Join the revolution. Sabotage FW. Help this game burn!
BURN DUST 2014
|
MySpaceTom
Xer Cloud Consortium
74
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 03:13:00 -
[30] - Quote
Spaceballs The Profile wrote:Jason Pearson wrote:YOU GUYS ARE SO DUMB OMG, SRS YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO MATHS
(Zero, you seem upset?) LONESTAAAAARRRR!! .... .... ....Evil forum rage will always persist because maths are dumb
LOLZ!!! You can comment on anything with a name like that! Be my guest!
4920616d204a6164656b204d656e616865696d277320526167696e672042696c652044756374
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |