|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1501
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 00:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
No this is not a troll post.
See I've been using the scouts for a while now, and I must say; "This is the most easiest and OP thing I've ever used".
Now we all know the Commando class right? And how it's almost completely useless at any tier other than PRO? (and even then it still fails terribly)
I believe the scouts are OP because they can do a better job of being completely useless than my Commando can. I mean you can't look me in the eye and tell me that scouts are too good at being useless.
But how do we fix this problem?
Simple. If we increase the stats of the Scout frames, such as speed, stamina, CPU/PG, passive scan radii, etc.; we would make the scouts less OP at being useless than the Commandos.
I know you scouts may not want this nerf, but I hope that level headed people can agree that this nerf really needs to happen.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1504
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 00:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:You had me going there for a minute......... I'm being serious
If we don't nerf the Scout class soon, they will be even more OP than the Commandos.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1509
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 00:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Atiim wrote:Roger Cordill wrote:You had me going there for a minute......... I'm being serious If we don't nerf the Scout class soon, they will be even more OP than the Commandos. Oh no, I see this, but I thought you were saying that the Commando is far more OP when it clearly isn't. They are both ******* useless. That's the joke.
You can't claim that something is ridiculously OP in comparison to another, when both roles are ridiculously UP.
Plus, it's not a medium frame carrying a Duvolle, so If I scream "nerf it" the COD kids and CCP will actually listen to this and "nerf" scouts.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1509
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 00:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Phew.
I'm glad to see that for once, everybody can agree that a nerf really did need to happen.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1531
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
mollerz wrote:And while we are at it, can we please just start players in their vehicles. I'm tired of barely beating the other teams LAV phats suits to the initial objectives. Instadrop vehicles from orbit aren't fast enough.
Your nerf is good, but it doesn't go far enough. I don't remember what the thread was titled, but CCP has already stated that they plan to make the ground base(s) and MCC farther away from objectives, allowing for people to have more time to call out LAVs and making DSs and other means of transportation a much more neccesary and tactical asset on the battlefield.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1531
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Roger Cordill wrote:Atiim wrote:Roger Cordill wrote:Atiim wrote:Roger Cordill wrote:You had me going there for a minute......... I'm being serious If we don't nerf the Scout class soon, they will be even more OP than the Commandos. Oh no, I see this, but I thought you were saying that the Commando is far more OP when it clearly isn't. They are both ******* useless. That's the joke. You can't claim that something is ridiculously OP in comparison to another, when both roles are ridiculously UP. Plus, it's not a medium frame carrying a Duvolle, so If I scream "nerf it" the COD kids and CCP will actually listen to this and "nerf" scouts. SO you didn't see what I did there? Scout: uselessness=very OP Commando uselessness= Scout's uselessness However, I'm seeing people using Commando's more cleverly, so Scouts are essentially getting a buff in uselessness due to people getting smart (this is based off of seeing a sq. of them just 10 minutes ago.). Therefore, Scout will be even more OP than Commando in terms of uselessness..... Reading this now, I see what you were getting at.
However, it was 2am when I made this thread, so I may have just misread or overlooked what you were saying.
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1535
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 19:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:I readied my claws to attack you and your clones.
Now they're stuck in this position. DAMN YOU! Don't worry I'll make it up to you.
How's about a new scratching post?
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1540
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 02:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Scheneighnay McBob wrote:My commando fits, as well as my scout fits are effective. Your argument is invalid.
My best commando combines an AR with a sniper rifle, and fights at the edge of the clusterfuck.
My best gallente scout has insane passive scanning and uses a shotgun. Instead of trying to out-strafe people, I watch my scanners to get the jump on them.
My best minmatar scout (and my favorite fit atm) has a sniper rifle, but focuses more on non-combat jobs, such as hacking unguarded objectives and dropping uplinks. One battle, I managed to top my team's scoreboard with it, going 4-0, with about 1500 WP. Much of the battle, I was running between the hills surrounding the objective to the supply depots, since my uplinks were being used so quickly. In my spare time, I was either countersniping, or sniping the uplink spam. So....
Scout's don't need any of the stuff I mentioned?
Okay.
Also, I negate this with the fact that being useful on the battlefield and having skill will negate the shortcomings of any class. (Usually, but there are some exceptions)
Just look at Assault and Logistics dropship pilots, you think they are perfectly fine as is? They are very succesful but I think we can all agree that those things need a serious buff or re-balance, which is coming SoonGäó
My Very First Thread About Tanks
-HAND
|
|
|
|