|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
243
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 18:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Is being a douche again
Why is this guy our CPM. This is no community representative that I want. He simply shuts out idea and people he does not like or can understand. And actually goes around calling people out on them, all the while insulting.
The hell man, should I expect better of a CPM?
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 19:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:Is being a douche againWhy is this guy our CPM. This is no community representative that I want. He simply shuts out idea and people he does not like or can understand. And actually goes around calling people out on them, all the while insulting. The hell man, should I expect better of a CPM? Nah IWS basically had as currently has done more for this community than all of smart arse forum trolls you are likely to list as CPM reps.
It is true, IWS has been to most active CPM. I don't even know who these other CPM are.
Still yet, the dude has a way of pissing people off. It does not seem right to me, that a Community representative should be treating parts of the community as he does. It's like when people were crying about losing their BPO's. People don't feel Aur compensates.
How does IWS respond, by calling them all idiots. True people were not just coming out and saying that, it was all about sue this sue that. People were upset, and how does the CPM respond, you're stupid.
Yes, I do question whether this man is open minded enough to fully convey our thoughts to CCP. Or to interpret those thoughts much less.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 20:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Um.. how is he being a douche in that thread again?
*they probably think CPM should be "YES" men to the players*
CPM should be "YES" man to neither players or CCP. Why if I was in the jedi council...
*anakin skywalker all over again...*
shut up. I'll "NO" man to everything. what's that? NO. You players feel what? NO. Hey.. CCP here's my 2 cent for that idea... NO.
By invalidating a good point that was on topic with the OP's discussion. And he did so by saying it derailed and ruined the conversation.
????
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 20:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:IWS gets harrassed by Takahiro every thread, because Takahiro has skilled into useless heavy and is mad and is a Minmatar spie.
Lol, this may be true, still yet, his point was on subject.
It does seem like these 2 have a history huh lol
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
249
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 20:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:With as much work IWS does for this community he should at the very least be considered for a community manager position. You're only butthurt because he doesn't agree with you.
Lol, never my friend. Plenty of people out there that don't agree with me. But just here recently, I've seen IWS make some rather stupid comments recently. That's what has got me so butthurt!
I will agree, IWS has worked with the community the most. His is the only name I really recognize. Though his people skills could certainly use some work, and it would help if he would step off his high horse and join the rest of us.
Community manager? No. There are better people out there for that position.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
249
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 20:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Please tell me why IWS is not allowed to express his opinions. He may be a CPM but that does not exclude him from expressing his opinion as a player. Also he may be a troll sometimes but CCP are trolls too. Even some of the CSM are trolls.
I never said he couldn't. It's the way he goes about it. Insulting those with differing opinions than your own is not the way to go about it.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
250
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 21:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
R F Gyro wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Please tell me why IWS is not allowed to express his opinions. He may be a CPM but that does not exclude him from expressing his opinion as a player. Also he may be a troll sometimes but CCP are trolls too. Even some of the CSM are trolls. I never said he couldn't. It's the way he goes about it. Insulting those with differing opinions than your own is not the way to go about it. The only people I see IWS insulting are people acting like d*cks; trolling, flaming, raging, etc. I have never seen him insult someone who was posting a well articulated opinion in a calm, reasonable manner, even when he has obviously disagreed with that opinion.
So he has to stoop to their level, to deal with them. Sounds childish to me.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:I love anti-CPM threads; it's like people hating on the current president/prime-minister - it's pointless because they're there for their full term and you won't be getting rid of them until that time is up (with the very rare occasions of massive misconduct exceptions). You're stuck with these guys until CCP decides otherwise, so quit b*tching about them. If and when there are elections, then is the time to voice your displeasure about them. Now, you are just wasting forum space on all this nonsense.
I agree, though I find it foolish that we can't display any displeasure over them.
And in real life, it's not pointless to express displeasure over your leader (well kinda, considering it's our senate and house that make the laws). Ever heard of the news, they are great at swaying public opinion with hate/love for the leader!!!
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
R F Gyro wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:R F Gyro wrote: The only people I see IWS insulting are people acting like d*cks; trolling, flaming, raging, etc. I have never seen him insult someone who was posting a well articulated opinion in a calm, reasonable manner, even when he has obviously disagreed with that opinion.
So he has to stoop to their level, to deal with them. Sounds childish to me. Possibly. Or just that he has little tolerance for whiners. Regardless, I've never seen him insult someone that I didn't think deserved it. But back to the specific point I was responding to though.... Tebu Gan wrote:Insulting those with differing opinions than your own is not the way to go about it. He doesn't insult people because they have different opinions to him; he insults people who are acting like d*cks.
So when IWS addressed all the "winers" over the BPO refund, they were acting like dicks? I saw them as upset over the fact that nothing on the market compares to the value of a BPO. It's easy to get caught up in the bullshit, and start spewing bullshit of your own. He didn't think the "winers" had a valid point or opinion, so he felt it necessary to insult that side of the community.
I'll admit, I've done my fair share of useless ranting and raging, but does it make sense to punch a pissed off bull in the face?
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:27:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cenex Langly wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:Is being a douche againWhy is this guy our CPM. This is no community representative that I want. He simply shuts out idea and people he does not like or can understand. And actually goes around calling people out on them, all the while insulting. The hell man, should I expect better of a CPM? You sad bro?
You know I like trolls right. Troll tears are the best
Nuff Said
|
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I strongly believe the word sink should be banned from this debate as its hurting the primary argument of fairity between infantry and vehicle operators.
Focus folks. Doesn't understand the idea of focus Now this thread is about redesigning the skill tree. Thank you Takahiro for enlightening our ignorance.
I really do not know how IWS came up with the idea that redesigning the skill tree was what Takahiro was about. Yes I see this as an insult, considering the man's posts had nothing to do with what IWS has "assumed".
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:[quote=Takahiro Kashuken]
Keep changing it to suit your needs but its a SINK
Vehicle tree in 1.7 is a SINK - fact
I wouldnt have mind it being a SINK if it was changed at least 6months ago so i knew how much SP i needed excatly to flesh out the vehicle tree because if i knew 6months ago that the tree would be such a SP SINK i wouldnt have gone into infantry at all or i could have gone all into infantry and had 4 diff proto suits with 4 proto weapons and all core skills by now
You can delete all this text again but you cant delete the fact that the SP needed for the vehicle tree has been increased by a factor of 3
Not including missing racial vehicles/turrets/mods/skills/pilot suits/more mods/more skills
I did a quick count, i can SINK into the 1.7 vehicle tree about 60mil SP roughly and thats nearly everything at level 5, including all missing things that could be 100mil of SP which is about 3 years worth at least, using boosters for every week, active and passive
So how about you focus on the fact that the vehicle tree has been turned into more of a SINK with 3times the SP needed
Lets double the sink then!
Another useless posts, that actually seeks to derail the conversation at hand. The OP of this thread spoke of the fairness being neglected when it came to infantry in 1.7. I see a point there.
Taki on the other hand made a good point from the tankers view on 1.7 and the respec. Totally on subject I thought. Not according to IWS
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
251
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 22:54:00 -
[13] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Heavy Salvo wrote:WELL insofar we have the Vehicle perspective although it seems as though you are quite upset he & the other pilots aren't looking at this from the infantry perspective and I'm assuming also disregarding the "free candy syndrome" you brought up at the beginning of this whole thing.
well then let me get your opinion on this,Saber, what exactly do you think is unfair in regards to a full respec in 1.7 from an infantry perspective? I'm on the fence which is why Takahiro is sort of hurting the entire conversation because he's pushing me away from wanting to side with the respeccers because by his logic it would be far more effective to redesign the tree which I wont also argue but its an entirely seperate issue. For Players are bored with their current fits. Some have made mistakes Players are feeling left out because they may have made the mistake of speccing into infantry when vehicles was their real calling. Against Free Candy Syndrome - the idea of a free respec at the time of anything gets nerfed, this behavior was well established back in beta and there are plenty of people who are very hard at letting go. Future Prospects - In combination with FCS this will hurt any potential to monetize the and automate the system if it ever gets developed on because it was something offered regularly for free and now has to be paid for. Buy 1 get 2 free is now buy 1 get one 1 free type of backlash. Notation See how 0 of these points have to do with the horrible tree design?
Now suddenly, it's taki hurting the conversation and his opinion? HOW??? OP wrote a good piece about how infantry feel hurt, and Taki took it and showed how tankers are getting hurt by the new "SP SINK". 2 sides of the same story, but Taki has already derailed the conversation somehow.
He has isolated taki, and calls him the PROBLEM. This is my problem, if he wanted to make a thread about respecs in general, then fine. But the discussion was about 1.7 partial respecs. And how those affected by it feel. There is no right or wrong answer, and all input should be taken.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 23:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Takahiro came into the thread talking about how the tree was a sink, in a thread that has nothing to do with the poorly designed tree and to be honest I didn't want to hear it again in a thread that tried to reasonably explain the need for a respec that made it somewhat agreeable to fight for that side.
Sink is an entirely separate topic. Period. I am extraordinary annoyed at the tree myself (and I have a really good idea what the future tree looks like and I find it revolting unfortunately I cannot share details because of NDA but I am doing my best to chop that thing down when possible) but the idiot won't let me be on his side ever, so there is no need to entertain him ever. So best to let him burn out of the way so more level headed folks can come forward when it comes time to argue the tree design.
I cannot agree with the banning of SINK from the discussion, as I see that it does play a part in the OP's discussion. And how does this have anything to do with the skill tree? Agreed it does need to go, but how does him introducing the bigger SP sink us tankers now have to dump points into lead to a discussion about the tree?
I thought it was all about 1.7 partial respecs tankers get to enjoy, either for tanks or full on infantry. And how Infantry will get no such favor (though given their trees are unchanged).
It was about the tanker going into full on infantry. And how that seemed unfair for infantry.
Then the tanker brings up the point that we didn't have this sink before, so now must build up even more SP to be as useful in our role as before. As most of us tankers have went to suit roles as a secondary after getting the points into tanks up where needed.
So, as I see it, Taki made a point against the infantry, showing that even though we may be getting our points back from tanks, some of us won't have enough to be as effective as before. So infantry kinda miss out, and us tankers will kinda miss out.
2 sides of the same story, IWS.
And there you go again, calling someone an idiot because they don't see the world your way. Grow up.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 23:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Let's also mention the debate over the 'sink' from Takahiro is about 4 months old and has destroyed about 6 threads so far.
4 months? We didn't know about the sink 4 months ago, nor partial respecs?
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 23:42:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Tebu Gan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Let's also mention the debate over the 'sink' from Takahiro is about 4 months old and has destroyed about 6 threads so far. 4 months? We didn't know about the sink 4 months ago, nor partial respecs? Oh? be careful who you try to defend then. He's been at this for a while and as others mentioned here they already know about it. I suspect he may had started his crusade before uprising 1.0 but didn't run into me about 4 months ago. Also I do class Tak into the 'hard to deal with' category, the sort of folks if you give them a wide variety of possible solutions to the issue they reject everything because they seemingly don't know what they want either. The type of folk that don't want the cake to eat it too. They're more in love with the idea of a cake that doesn't exist nor will ever exist and eating that one. The sort of people that well ultimately the CPM would be worst to dealing with because we're not game designers. Just think of us as the little devil or little angle on the shoulders of the developers. The devs are more than capable of ignoring both of those little guys.
Be careful who I defend? Is that a threat fella. I for one don't defend "people", but Ideas. It would seem you have some bad blood with this particular individual. So you bring up past discussions with this person, in a thread where it has no relevance, because you assume ulterior motives.
I don't know Taki, and in all honesty, as an introvert, don't care to. So when I look at a post, I don't look to who posted, I look at what was posted. Who posted it hardly has any relevance.
So what if you have a hard head to deal with, it's not your place to judge. Only listen. Quit making assumptions about the people posting and actually pay attention to what's being said, not only that that meshes with your thinking. Or that that does not.
As a CPM that does take our ideas to CCP, regardless of whether they care to listen or not, I expect better of you. More open and free thought, not a bashing of people you think are wrong and Illogical. I really hope that your position isn't paid. Otherwise CCP is paying you to bash on their customers when you see fit. Namely because they are "stupid".
Such a nasty, ugly word, and has no place in critical thinking.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 23:48:00 -
[17] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:daishi mk03 wrote:jenza best cpm <3
This thread needs more <3 's.
Putting my ***** away now. lol
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
253
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 00:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Ideas are meant to be shattered into millions of pieces so that the best shards of them can be picked up and glued into something better.
Also Ideas don't have feelings, emotion, agendas lesser than the truths, and the truly greatest of ideas requires no mortal guardians. Maybe a custodian but certainly no metaphorical shield.
Also threat?
More like word of caution.
Also Tebu I don't think poorly of you, you have yet to give reason for so. Taki has for months now and shows little to no sign of change.
No Idea are there, they are already in pieces. They are simply waiting for somebody to come along and pick up the pieces to make something great.
Also, Ideas are neither right or wrong, and none are better than the other. They are just that, ideas. A grain of salt, in the shaker.
Caution
Let me tell you, plenty of people don't like me, and I don't like plenty of people. Though I don't shut those people out simply because I can't come to terms with their rational.
It takes all kinds of people to make the world go round, and it's respect that glues it all together. Be the better man for a change, and respect even when respect is not given.
Nuff Said
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
257
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 01:51:00 -
[19] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:My time is rather limited as well as my ability to find the best of ideas though.
Loudest of voices are often wrong and its hard to find the best of voices buried underneath all of the turmoil above.
I do ignore voices at times because they haven't changed from the exact first time they posted on the subject thus are nothing more than a broken record to me. Sometimes I do need reminders but when someone puts that much passion behind something its hard to forget. Yelling louder and over and over again doesn't help your cause further on my front. New views interest me the most.
There are people whom I did have rather heated arguments with before, but when asked by CCP I give them the truth, players are not happy and CCP should strive to a more preferable solution. I certainly do not stomp out voices when it comes time to talk about it.
I understand, but keep in mind they do hold valid points. Maybe not the whole of what is said, but there is a piece of that whole to be taken away. And they don't always say the exact same thing over and over. There has to be something to be taken away from each exchange.
And yes, more often than not, with the current state people tend to be more irrational. It's anger that drives their posts. But should you be adding fuel to that fire? I know, there is a lot of bullshit, but somewhere in there is a tidbit of useful feedback. Something has them ticked off, more often than not something stupid. But please man, stop callin them out. We got plenty of people that already do just that!
Nuff Said
|
|
|
|