|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
441
   |
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Post your ideas here, because I'm to lazy to write about my own, but want to hear active dampener discussion all the same. Or don't, whatever.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
442
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
How does HTFU apply here? When did I start to QQ?
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
442
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mdog 24158 wrote:No there needs to be active cloak for scouts
How does a visual cloak stop one from making sound?
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
442
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:How does HTFU apply here? When did I start to QQ? Don't mind'em, they're just uppity. I also feel that there should be active modules, particularly hardeners and dampeners.
I was thinking more like an equipment. A hard counter to the current active scanner.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
443
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Here's an idea, HTFU and level dampening. somethings up this guy's ass.
Anh, I probably told him to HTFU one time when he was QQing. I do that a lot ya know. Or maybe he agreed with someone I told to HTFU. Who knows?
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
443
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 00:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Sgt Kirk wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Here's an idea, HTFU and level dampening. somethings up this guy's ass. Anh, I probably told him to HTFU one time when he was QQing. I do that a lot ya know. Or maybe he agreed with someone I told to HTFU. Who knows? HTFU is a foolish term anyhow. It is the equivalent to telling a child not to be sad. What does it do? Nothing. Not a thing.
Yah but some people deserve it. I try to use it in appropriate situations.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
444
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 01:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vulpes Dolosus wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:Sgt Kirk wrote:Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Here's an idea, HTFU and level dampening. somethings up this guy's ass. Anh, I probably told him to HTFU one time when he was QQing. I do that a lot ya know. Or maybe he agreed with someone I told to HTFU. Who knows? HTFU is a foolish term anyhow. It is the equivalent to telling a child not to be sad. What does it do? Nothing. Not a thing. The HTFU was for the request for a redundant, easy-mode counter to the active scanner. Redundant because you have all you need to counter active scanners with the passive dampening mods. If scanners are really a problem for you, level scanning and equip a complex dampener, you only need one on a med suit to counter 99% of the scanners in pubs. He's asking for an easy way to counter scans, and since active mods are typically better than passive, it means he doesn't want to put sp and a low slot into dampener. Typical scanner QQ. Had he came up with actual ideas, examples, data, etc. to support an argument, then we can work with that. But this "I'm lazy, scanners hurt my feelings," spam of a post is just whining.
And you sir are a fool, if you think that sacrificing 3 or 4 low slots to counter an active scanner that takes up one equipment slot is fair and balanced. Honestly I don't see what your problem is. You're the one exploring EZ-modes here buba. *facepalm* HTFU *pufft*
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
446
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 01:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:I would like something like Deployable Interference
Not something to dampen your signal, but something that would throw out misleading information over a certain area.
A 40m bubble that would show enemies that aren't actually there, creating confusion and a diversion.
I am torn between something like this and somthing that mimics the current functionality of the AS. If we went this route I think it would be prudent to be able to carry multiple deployable units per equipment slot, like nano hives.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
Son-Of A-Gun
3dge of D4rkness
SoulWing Alliance
447
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 02:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vulpes Dolosus wrote:Son-Of A-Gun wrote:And you sir are a fool, if you think that sacrificing 3 or 4 low slots to counter an active scanner that takes up one equipment slot is fair and balanced. Honestly I don't see what your problem is. You're the one exploiting EZ-mode here buba. *facepalm* HTFU *pufft* It only takes two enhanced dampeners at lvl5 dampening to block all proto scans bar the focused. Math: 50[scan profile]-(50*.1)[skill bonus]-(50*.2)[first dampener]-(50*(.2*.87))[second, with penalty]=26.3 If you really want to complain about the focused, just remember they're bring a 40k proto equipment that takes a fourth to a fifth of their PG/CPU well, and it only lasts for 5secs.
Only 28 dB is not the lowest a proto scanner can go. Try 15 dB, which cannot even be surpassed with dampening mods on a med frame.
{:)}{3GÇó>
|
|
|
| |
|