|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sarcastic Dreamkiller
Northwind Alliance
Dark Taboo
67
   |
Posted - 2013.11.24 23:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:They're perfectly safe in your inventory. This has already been stated by CCP.You will keep BPOs you already have, but you simply won't be able to get more. There is one whiner plastering GD with threads at the moment about how BPOs for non-existent items are being refunded and how that's clearly an awful thing and he should be reimbursed further, but nobody intelligent actually agrees with him. 100% right |
Sarcastic Dreamkiller
Northwind Alliance
Dark Taboo
67
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 11:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Justice Prevails wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:They're perfectly safe in your inventory. This has already been stated by CCP.You will keep BPOs you already have, but you simply won't be able to get more. There is one whiner plastering GD with threads at the moment about how BPOs for non-existent items are being refunded and how that's clearly an awful thing and he should be reimbursed further, but nobody intelligent actually agrees with him. Did not have the BPOs in question, but I am happy that people are raising hell about them. It gives CCP a heads up. I bought the vet and elite packs mainly for the BPOs, the aurum in my mind was a bonus. I know at the moment there are no plans to remove them. But this uproar over 4 vehicle modules will be nothing compared to fire and brimstone that would rain if CCP did try to remove the BPOs from mercs who bought the packs. For all the people who say BPOs are bad for dust. Matchmaking and pubstomping are more immediate and serious threats to the survival of the game. Think a new player gives a crap about the economy when he is going 1-15 in a pub match?
True, but the majority of players probably don't give a crap about the economy in the first place. There is no proof that anyone cares about the economy aside from those who whine about it on here. |
Sarcastic Dreamkiller
Northwind Alliance
Dark Taboo
68
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:02:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Saheiji wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:This is about CCP having no respect for their customers. I disagree. The customers, players, Mercenaries - whatever you want to call us - have been asking CCP to change the vehicles. We have been asking for a long time. I admit, what they do is quite radical, but hey, we wanted the change. Are those 4 BPOs really that important? Or do you really think this is just the start and they want to remove all BPOs? In one of these threads about the BPOs I posted my opinion about this, and I still do not think they could legally pull off removing any BPOs that were part of a bundle purchased on the PSN store. However, nothing could stop them from removing all standard Market-place BPOs. Maybe respect for their customers? Only time will tell. It's not about the vehicle changes. The changes are being used as an excuse to remove the BPOs. It shows the level to which they will go to take things from us. I'm not concerned about any legal implications, I'm concerned about how meaningless aurum transactions become, when they are treated with such disdain.
The BPO's were removed because they won't work anymore, it was actually pretty nice of CCP to provide the compensation that they did considering they could have just let them sit in people's assets for no reason (why keep something that you can't use?)
AUR transactions are already meaningless, they became that way the moment blueprints were taken off the market. |
Sarcastic Dreamkiller
Northwind Alliance
Dark Taboo
68
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:04:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rynoceros wrote:There sure is a lot of concern for the economy of a market that does not currently or will not exist for some time to come.
Officer Weapons Salvage drop frequency will affect the economy of that non-existant market more than MLT and STD module BPOs.
You aren't kidding.
And I'm pretty sure that the only players that care are those who are on these forums complaining, because I never hear anyone talk about it in game. |
Sarcastic Dreamkiller
Northwind Alliance
Dark Taboo
70
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 19:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Saheiji wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:This is about CCP having no respect for their customers. I disagree. The customers, players, Mercenaries - whatever you want to call us - have been asking CCP to change the vehicles. We have been asking for a long time. I admit, what they do is quite radical, but hey, we wanted the change. Are those 4 BPOs really that important? Or do you really think this is just the start and they want to remove all BPOs? In one of these threads about the BPOs I posted my opinion about this, and I still do not think they could legally pull off removing any BPOs that were part of a bundle purchased on the PSN store. However, nothing could stop them from removing all standard Market-place BPOs. Maybe respect for their customers? Only time will tell. It's not about the vehicle changes. The changes are being used as an excuse to remove the BPOs. It shows the level to which they will go to take things from us. I'm not concerned about any legal implications, I'm concerned about how meaningless aurum transactions become, when they are treated with such disdain. Ok conspiracy theorist tell me why CCP wouldn't just remove all of the vehicle BPOs right now and excuse it with the vehicle rebalance? If they were in fact covering up the removal with the rebalance then it would only be logical if they removed at least more then just 4 pretty useless BPOs. Please give me a reasonable explanation for that. First off they aren't 4 useless BPOs as I already use 3 of the 4 on my Blood Raider and Ishukone Watch Sagas to max out it's slots, and give myself a fully kitted and completely free LAV to run people down with.
they will be useless in 1.7
useless as in "no longer usable, or attachable"
|
|
|
| |
|