|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
0
   |
Posted - 2013.11.27 06:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Jak'Saan wrote:
Wow you really are the worst CPM ever... dude seriously go home.
Anyway, down to it: here's a little statistics for our genius CPM based on weekly peaks:
*Proceeds to show us very bad maths*
Statistics 101 is ---------------------------------------------> that way
Lol! You do realize the math adds up right?
So if we take into account all the new players:
Current week active players - first week active players SHOULD EQUAL: First week active players + all or at least a small portion of new players since First week.
Instead what we see is:
Current week active players < First week active players + ALL new players since first week.
Or better described as, players are quitting faster than they are joining. |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 01:15:00 -
[2] - Quote
It should also be noted that the stats here are REALLY generous.
The stats only include new players of that ONE day... Not all week long. The numbers would be much worse if all 7 days in the week were counted. |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 16:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:Therefore, even if you have 800 new characters created in a day, you would probably only see a bump of an additional 20-30 players on at a given time.
The point is, with 800 or so new players a DAY for a week, in one weeks time you should at least see the active players in a given day (the weekly peak) increase by 30-20, but we see that it decreases most weeks.
dustwaffle wrote:You're welcome for the maths lessons and reading comprehension lessons. Next time, maybe you'll be able to understand what you're looking at when you look at a graph.
Using the word "maths" makes me question your credibility on this subject.
dustwaffle wrote:I do, however, have a question for you. Given your earlier post about deleting Dust from your PS3 (referring to your post on 22nd November), why are you still posting rubbish maths on a video game forum when you' (1) are no longer playing the game; (2) do not have the game installed anyway; and (3) claim that the game is dying?
Because the game was good once. My favorite in fact, even with all the bugs. Then they started showing sloppy development habits (coding hacks and then forgetting to remove the hacks once they fix the real issues) and just like that, 1.6 HD fixes meant if I wanted to stay on the top of the charts I'd have to proto.
dustwaffle wrote:Give me some help here, since I don't understand why someone who isn't interested in a game anymore would still continue making shitposts on the forums a WEEK after the game has been deleted.
Plain and simple. If CCP ever comes out with a fix to this ****** TTK issue, I would be the first to re-download and start up again. My posts are a pissed way of saying, "CCP get your **** together!" So that we can reclaim maybe just SOME of the people who have left for the same reasons. I deleted it because I was sick of getting frustrated at getting killed just for being seen, even though I was still top three spots on the team. But I am hopeful that CCP will at some point realize how frustrating they've made their game and that they are in fact losing players over it.
People who don't care, don't hate. |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Solitar Greywatch wrote:I heard some D.A.R.K. L.E.G.I.O.N. soldiers talking about 1.7 and they said it is going to be the biggest content drop in Dust 514. Just wanted to say if this is true.
Honestly as much hate as I am spewing, I'm starting to wonder myself. I really am thinking (hoping, praying really) that this is true and that is why CCP is being so quiet about it.
CCP you've held me onto this game since the beginning, I am giving you the benefit of the doubt... See you at 1.7
1.6 == fail |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
1
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 17:29:00 -
[5] - Quote
BMSTUBBY wrote:KGB Sleep wrote:Let this ******* stupid thread die already. Never! I want to keep reminding people how much of a troll this CPM is.  CCP will never lock or ban their little monkey on a string though.
This! I've already reported this thread as a troll thread and any other IWS troll posts as well. But alas, we all know this to be true...
BMSTUBBY wrote:CCP will never lock or ban their little monkey on a string though.
|
Slick Saan
FotM 514
5
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
Failure was subjectively a plural thing already like building materials are because the plural-ification of the content Threads.
As in:
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: My life of failure |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
5
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 20:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Slick Saan wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
Failure was subjectively a plural thing already like building materials are because the plural-ification of the content Threads.
As in: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: My life of failure
You know though, despite his trolliness nature, at a certain point you kind of have to feel bad for the guy. I'm gonna take it easier on him from here on out. |
Slick Saan
FotM 514
5
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 03:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Unscientific numbers are unscientific.
I disagree. |
|
|
| |
|