| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Yun Hee Ryeon
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
366
   |
Posted - 2013.11.30 07:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Wait. The Empress said what?
((Pretty sure that's OOC knowledge, there, Aztec. You may have read Tony G's train wrecks, but your character hasn't.)) |
Yun Hee Ryeon
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 02:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:The evidence is all over outer space. Even the ancient verification method of carbon dating shows that there are artifacts that existed before any of the primal civilizations we have discovered.
The Ancients are historical fact. We have names for them: Sleepers, Talocan, Yan Jung, Takhmal. Jove, arguably. We know full well that they probably came from elsewhere.
"Terrans," however, are, thus far, a legend at best. |
Yun Hee Ryeon
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
371
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:The very theory of Terrans is entertained by the beginnings of the aforementioned civilizations. Archaeological dating shows that they had technology that was more advanced than that if today's.
There beginnings are also askewed due to them, the Yan Jung and Talocan, not having any known primitive period. They just suddenly appear on the archaeological timeline and then progress forward.
So the question is an obvious one, why did these civilizations have very advanced technology thousands of years ago?
Because they came from elsewhere. That much is not really a matter of debate. The Sisters believe they came through the Eve Gate, and that seems as likely an explanation as any.
Our common genetic root is apparent enough. What is NOT apparent is any set of specifics concerning that common origin. If you're content to label whatever world we originated on "Terra" and its inhabitants "Terrans," then you're on somewhat solid ground. If you're looking, however, to cite "Terran" customs, appearance, technologies, geography, politics, history, or much of anything else with any level of detail, you're working at the level of purest speculation, at best.
A common origin is likely. Anyone who claims to know the details, however, is almost certainly fibbing. |
| |
|