DUST Search - 1.7 gunlogi feedback

Harpyja wrote:

jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote:

Harpyja wrote:

All of the numbers posted by CCP look fine to me. Except maybe give mIssiles more range.

Also, a booster will let you recover full shields much faster than an armor rep. So your argument that shield recharge should be higher than the armor rep is invalid.

PS Im looking forward to using Gunnlogis in 1.7, so you can't say I'm biased toward armor.

so? shields ALWAYS regen faster than armor, plus it would make not having a booster a good option

It's exactly that where you don't need a module and still able to regenerate which sets shield apart. Armor needs to give up a slot so it can regenerate on its own. And then it's only on par with shield regeneration. Throw in a booster to balance out the number of slots used and your regen is much higher now.

So just look at it this way. Shields can always "1-up" armor on regeneration. Without regeneration mods on both vehicles, shield has higher regeneration. If both vehicles spend one slot for regeneration, shield will again have higher regeneration. And armor will only have a slightly better regeneration when the shield vehicle doesn't give up any slots for regeneration.


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
dogmanpig black market bank 34	Posted - 2013.11.11 10:40:00 - [1] - Quote the math shows that it would take around 11 seconds for missiles to kill a decent fit maddy post 1.7 You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 7 1/3 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
dogmanpig black market bank 37	Posted - 2013.11.12 01:12:00 - [2] - Quote hey OP will you edit this when they push vehicle update again? You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 7 1/3 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
dogmanpig black market bank 37	Posted - 2013.11.12 01:22:00 - [3] - Quote Harpyja wrote: dogmanpig wrote: hey OP will you edit this when they push vehicle update again? I'm vey certain that they aren't pushing the changes further back. you never know... it is CCP. so its more probable then it come out on time. You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 7 1/3 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"
dogmanpig black market bank 40	Posted - 2013.11.12 01:33:00 - [4] - Quote Harpyja wrote: jerrmy12 kahoalii wrote: Harpyja wrote: All of the numbers posted by CCP look fine to me. Except maybe give mIssiles more range. Also, a booster will let you recover full shields much faster than an armor rep. So your argument that shield recharge should be higher than the armor rep is invalid. PS Im looking forward to using Gunnlogis in 1.7, so you can't say I'm biased toward armor. so? shields ALWAYS regen faster than armor, plus it would make not having a booster a good option It's exactly that where you don't need a module and still able to regenerate which sets shield apart. Armor needs to give up a slot so it can regenerate on its own. And then it's only on par with shield regeneration. Throw in a booster to balance out the number of slots used and your regen is much higher now. So just look at it this way. Shields can always "1-up" armor on regeneration. Without regeneration mods on both vehicles, shield has higher regeneration. If both vehicles spend one slot for regeneration, shield will again have higher regeneration. And armor will only have a slightly better regeneration when the shield vehicle doesn't give up any slots for regeneration. or thats how it should work post vehicle update, whenever it may happen. You hate me, I hate you. Lets keep it that way. Level 7 1/3 Forum alt. "Its worth half a penny and a reach around"