|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
863
   |
Posted - 2013.11.11 16:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:With a 78m range it's going to be insane. I won't be able to stay competitive with my weapon anymore, I'm going to say goodbye to my love (Tac AR, which will become completely obsolete) and join the Darkside (Rail or Scrambler).
I will probably spec in both of them, so whatever gets nerfed, I will always have a powerful weapon to play with. This is why I'm saving 1+ million SP.
Get your TAC AR outta here!
What we really need to focus on is the Burst AR. 
There there Mr. Scout and Ms. Heavy, don't cry
You'll still be useful in my eyes
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
863
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 16:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zero Harpuia wrote:Keri Starlight wrote:With a 78m range it's going to be insane. I won't be able to stay competitive with my weapon anymore, I'm going to say goodbye to my love (Tac AR, which will become completely obsolete) and join the Darkside (Rail or Scrambler).
I will probably spec in both of them, so whatever gets nerfed, I will always have a powerful weapon to play with. This is why I'm saving 1+ million SP. This is kindof the POINT of the Scrambler Rifle. The Tactical Assault Rifle is the Gallente ripoff of the Scrambler Rifle, like the Assault Scrambler Rifle is the Amarrian ripoff of the Blaster Rifle. The Scrambler Rifle is SUPPOSED to seem better than the TAR, just like the AR is better than the AScR. You aren't supposed to be able to spec into just one gun (AR) and get all the roles covered (AR and TAR). Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's the way we do it in New Eden.
In terms and philosophy, you would be absolute correct.
However, this is a video game. That being said all weapons are supposed to be balanced and have it's strength and weaknesses. One weapon should not to be nearly the exact same thing but inherently better in all aspects just because of lore and terminology.
And don't give me that "Welcome To New Eden" BS. That is no excuse for something to be 100% better than another weapon or for something to be insanely OP. (Not saying SCRs are OP)
There there Mr. Scout and Ms. Heavy, don't cry
You'll still be useful in my eyes
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
867
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 21:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aisha Ctarl wrote:Atiim wrote:[quote=Zero Harpuia]
In terms and philosophy, you would be absolute correct.
However, this is a video game. That being said all weapons are supposed to be balanced and have it's strength and weaknesses. One weapon should not to be nearly the exact same thing but inherently better in all aspects just because of lore and terminology.
And don't give me that "Welcome To New Eden" BS. That is no excuse for something to be 100% better than another weapon or for something to be insanely OP. (Not saying SCRs are OP) I think someone is upset that SCRs are viable weapons.
Please, tell me where I have said that I am upset about SCRs being viable.
Balance and Fair Game Mechanics > New Eden's BS.
There there Mr. Scout and Ms. Heavy, don't cry
You'll still be useful in my eyes
|
|
|
| |
|