|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2077
   |
Posted - 2013.11.11 05:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Imperial is the next Tac AR but better |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2079
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 05:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Imperial is the next Tac AR but better Except it is actually worse than the old TAC AR in many ways. Con's: -less optimum range than the TAC AR -overheats, really easily -laser, not hybrid (not technically worse, but armor has since become a FotM) -it actually has less DPS than the old TAC AR did Not quite a Con, but worth mentioning. -Optical Sight vs ACOG-like scope. I prefer it actually, but I've seen people whine about it.
It does more damage per bullet than the TAC AR....rof is up to the trigger man.
A lot of this stuff sounds good on paper, but practically, the Imperial is a bigger beast than the TAC AR. The only problem with it is that it overheats. And that is only a problem in CQC situations. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2079
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 05:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Dengru wrote:Scrambler rifle users seem want to think there is a essential difference between them and other AR users, and that theres some trick and skill to their weapon others cannot pick up on
Just like mass driver users liked to think there was a difference between them an other players, and we all remember what happened when everyone spec into proto MDs.
People are gonna see.. Except there is undoubtedly more skill required to use the ScR effectively than there is to use the AR effectively. If you think they take less than or equal skill than an AR, you are delusional. The ScR has actual drawbacks, something the AR is really lacking.
Besides overheating...what is the difference between the two?? |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2080
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Imperial is the next Tac AR but better Except it is actually worse than the old TAC AR in many ways. Con's: -less optimum range than the TAC AR -overheats, really easily -laser, not hybrid (not technically worse, but armor has since become a FotM) -it actually has less DPS than the old TAC AR did Not quite a Con, but worth mentioning. -Optical Sight vs ACOG-like scope. I prefer it actually, but I've seen people whine about it. It does more damage per bullet than the TAC AR....rof is up to the trigger man. A lot of this stuff sounds good on paper, but practically, the Imperial is a bigger beast than the TAC AR. The only problem with it is that it overheats. And that is only a problem in CQC situations. Are you really forgetting how bad the TAC AR was? It actually replaced Duvolles comepletely. No other weapon has been OP enough to do that, not even the MDs.
I picked up the Imperial and stopped using the Duvolle and the Carthum Assault Scr. The only reason I put it down is because it overheats rather quickly in CQC. But then when I fit an smg in my Cal Assault suit, I have no problem. Will be better once I get my amarr suit. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2081
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Fizzer94 wrote:Ydubbs81 RND wrote:Fizzer94 wrote:Dengru wrote:Scrambler rifle users seem want to think there is a essential difference between them and other AR users, and that theres some trick and skill to their weapon others cannot pick up on
Just like mass driver users liked to think there was a difference between them an other players, and we all remember what happened when everyone spec into proto MDs.
People are gonna see.. Except there is undoubtedly more skill required to use the ScR effectively than there is to use the AR effectively. If you think they take less than or equal skill than an AR, you are delusional. The ScR has actual drawbacks, something the AR is really lacking. Besides overheating...what is the difference between the two?? Semi Auto rather than Full auto? Laser instead of Hybrid? Secondary Fire option? The differences are quite obvious. Do you honestly think the AR takes more skill to use effectively than the ScR?
You can't compare the Imperial to the Duvolle. You would have to compare the Imperial to the Tac AR and the Carthum to the Duvolle. And when you do that, you see that there isn't much difference as far as requiring skill.
To me, the scrambler rifle is an assault rifle deviant.....both uses the same shooting mechanics. They just have different qualities as far as bonuses to shield and penalties to armor. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries
EoN.
2081
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
Aqua-Regia wrote:Been seeing lot of player go to the ScR as of late, maybe it time to nerf it before it get out of hand. You ScR better hope CCP release the other new AR in 1.7 and not move it up to 1.8,1.9, to 2.0.
I hated single shot weapons until I came to Dust... |
|
|
| |
|