|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
401
   |
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Galvan Nized wrote:If we had a stable game where you actually knew what you were speccing into then I would say "no" to respecs. However we don't and in these turbulent times who the hell knows what CCP will do with any of the skills.
This is logical reasoning.
Better than: Either just screaming "RESPEEEEEEECS GAME SUXX" or "NO RESPECS THIS IS EEEEEEEVE, BEWARE OF FOTM".
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
401
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
MassiveNine wrote:The real problem is creating a game based off balance and then not releasing all of the items to balance properly. People want respecs because they specced into something they didn't want to while waiting for CCP to release something that they are going to push back 15 times. I don't blame them.
^ logical reasoning.
People do want to play the game. And since for example, the Amarr Laser tanks are not released yet, they could play with a Madrugar with blaster meanwhile..
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
402
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
I just think CCP need to refund the SP during this period of unstable game as soon as they decide to re-implement/re-balance something. Then you actually get a choice to not spec into that specific skill tree again.
This is what pisses me off: CCP refunded the SP when they re-built weapon-¦s reload skill, but when they reduced cal logi CPU or replaced the cal assault reload bonus with this crappy extender bonus, we did not get our SP back.
Please give us some consistency CCP. You either refund SP when you change stats or you dont.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
402
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
Also, I do not believe EVE ever had these problems, since you are not locked down in that game like we are locked down to a specific dropsuit (you have to wait 2 months to fully get another one). In EVE you get access to several ships with the same skills. Totally different thing.
Do not compare these two games in the current state of Dust 514.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
408
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:What they could do is like what they do in EVE with neural remaps
You get so many a year free and on events you may claim another respec among other prizes
So just say you get 1 free respec a year, and with a new expansion to celebrate they may do some events with different prizes like a heavy prize vehicle prize etc and you could swap that prize for 1 extra respec but you would only have 2 respecs a year
But atm with 1.7 the entire vehicle tree is being changed and with it also AV to a point, for vehicles users a respec is in order due to how much of the tree is being changed
Overall i would pay AUR for a respec, but i would limit how many respecs you can buy and use to 2 a year, or CCP could give everyone a free respec once a year
The question is: How are they going to classify a vehicle user?
It is not as easy as some might think to classify a vehicle user. Sure, they could refund all SP in the vehicle skill tree for everyone. But they might aswell give out an optional full respec to everyone. That is giving us a choice to live with our decisions.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
408
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 14:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Respecs in general are bad, they allow someone to change their entire loadout without the need for training!
That said they should be on offer to the newberries upto 3mil skill points, this stops people being stuck with uninformed choices that they didn't understand. For the vets, no respecs ever, instead resets, completely reset all skills and lower spnto 1mil.
Half the point is working with the weapon as you skill it up!
Full respec for everyone that has passed 3 million SP so far then too (all players, that is). Otherwise it wont be fair.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
409
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 14:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:What they could do is like what they do in EVE with neural remaps
You get so many a year free and on events you may claim another respec among other prizes
So just say you get 1 free respec a year, and with a new expansion to celebrate they may do some events with different prizes like a heavy prize vehicle prize etc and you could swap that prize for 1 extra respec but you would only have 2 respecs a year
But atm with 1.7 the entire vehicle tree is being changed and with it also AV to a point, for vehicles users a respec is in order due to how much of the tree is being changed
Overall i would pay AUR for a respec, but i would limit how many respecs you can buy and use to 2 a year, or CCP could give everyone a free respec once a year The question is: How are they going to classify a vehicle user? It is not as easy as some might think to classify a vehicle user. Sure, they could refund all SP in the vehicle skill tree for everyone. But they might aswell give out an optional full respec to everyone. That is giving us a choice to live with our decisions. For example, some people might have wanted to do tanks, but refused due to the imbalance between AV and tanks. That is a problem I have about 18mil into vehicles i think and the rest into infantry But how does CCP know? The entire skill tree for vehicles is getting changed, the descriptions, what they do, some removed, more added etc With most infantry changes the weapon itself changes but the skills generally dont but even so the 1.7 rebalance is a huge change to everything for vehicles If CCP gives out an optional respec many will take it even if they dont use vehicles, maybe just to tidy up what they skilled into, some will obv skill out of things, others may spec into things they like more With an optional respec its under CCP control, if they gave one out free every year it wouldnt be too bad just dont waste it
1.6 changed the game over night. Dont you believe 1.7 will completely change the game, especially how infantry and vehicles work together? Also the new assault rifles will be released, invalidating any other weapon than ARs.
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
Spectral Clone
Dust2Dust.
Top Men.
409
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 14:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
Also, from dust round table in EVE Vegas:
Zion Shad wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:Is there a plan to give out a respec before the game turns to version 2.0? They r looking at a way so you can respec. Now they not sure how you may pay or it being balanced but it will come
+¦-damage specialist since Sep ´13.
CCP please make our decisions matter.
"AR 514. Core Locus 514. Bricktank 514."
|
|
|
| |
|