Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
321
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
I made more of a rant in the events thread, so I'll be a bit more civilized here.
CCP, I assume the "3x" SP (in quotes b/c that's not really what it is) event is intended to bring some players back and re-energize the player base, as well as give us some SP to use when 1.7 comes out. That's all fine and good but you are doing it wrong!
So, you triplet he cap, which as I recall is a bit under 200k, we will round up to make the math easier. So, triple the cap is 600k. Not too shabby, I'd like to make that much in a week for sure. However, by only tripling SP from WP you take something that should reduce the grind into something that makes it worse
Maths (it's late so bear with me, I'm dumbing it down due to fatigue):
Normal conditions: Let's take the average halfway decent player, makes about 1000-1500 WP or so on average per game. Average game of skirmish takes 20 minutes? It comes out to around (again, rounding off to make the math easier) 10000 SP per match, 500 SP per minute. It takes roughly 20 battles to cap out, which, if Scotty really likes you, takes around 7-8 hours.
Actual triple SP: All SP from battles are tripled. Math is easy, you now make 30,000 SP per match, and cap out at 600,000 in the same 7-8 hours.
"Triple SP" as planned: You now get 3 SP per WP, which is still less than time based SP accrual, btw.
So, the average battle now nets you a grand total of, yes, 2-3000 extra SP. THATS IT! Less impressive when you look at it that way, no?
So, now you make 13000 SP per game. To actually realize the promised tripled cap, you now have to play FORTY SIX battles to cap out, more than double! (600,000/13,000). So now it takes you 46x20/60 = 15 hours. - Let's say for the sake of argument you are ReGnYuM or something, and you make 4000SP per battle. You get 8000 extra SP per battle, let's call it 20,000 SP. You still have to fight 30 battles to cap out, so the argument that structuring the bonus this way rewards people who play well is still bogus because even an outlier who makes 4000WP a battle (if anyone can even average that, I have no idea) has to play more than usual to hit the new cap.
Please answer this question then. CCP: If you have a player base who already feels like there is an unnecessary amount of grinding involved, why the f-- would you give us a "bonus" event that makes us have to grind for twice as long!
The right way to do "triple SP" as a bonus? We put out the same time and effort to get triple the total SP.
Honestly, find me one person who complained after the true triple SP event that he or she just didn't have to work hard enough for it. "Please CCP, can I have the opportunity to grind twice as much?" Raise your hand. Anyone? No?
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
Komodo Jones
Chaotik Serenity
191
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
From what I read I got the idea that we would just get SP at 3x the normal rate from battles and increase the cap by 3x, I didn't see anything mentioned about war points. I know you're referring to the double SP event where they simply increased the cap and slightly increased your SP gain based on war points, but there's nothing to indicate that it's going to be like that this time around. There's also nothing to indicate otherwise, either way it's far too late for this, the event starts in like 8 hours, should have said something a week ago lol. |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
321
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
It was only recently clarified in the event thread by CCP eterne here
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
Zeylon Rho
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2984
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Komodo Jones wrote:From what I read I got the idea that we would just get SP at 3x the normal rate from battles and increase the cap by 3x, I didn't see anything mentioned about war points. I know you're referring to the double SP event where they simply increased the cap and slightly increased your SP gain based on war points, but there's nothing to indicate that it's going to be like that this time around. There's also nothing to indicate otherwise, either way it's far too late for this, the event starts in like 8 hours, should have said something a week ago lol.
We couldn't raise hell about it before because they waited till literally a day before to actually inform us how the event would work, and it's buried on page 7.
If you don't feel like clicking, it IS the same as that asinine event from before that everyone hated:
Quote: Passive battle SP is not increased, it's only active battle SP that is increased.
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
321
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 05:30:00 -
[5] - Quote
Exactly. The way the original post is worded makes it sound like a real triple SP week, but apparently it is not. Yet another bit of pretty clear-cut feedback from the player base to CCP that was completely ignored.
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
Chesyre Armundsen
Thanes Of Dust
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 07:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
I hate to burst any bubbles, and maybe its because I didn't go into too much depth scrutinizing the word choice of the announcement, but I assumed it would be an active SP event and *DING-DING-DING* it is.
The previous events were the same and it makes sense that to bring value to a SP week that it has to be something you work for. They could hand out bonuses on any number of qualifications (the upcoming weapon kill week being a good example) but the active participation for this following week is what they chose.
Any additional SP boost I get is a boon. Don't bite the hand that feeds. |
Flint Beastgood III
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
287
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 10:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
I would've liked to see ingame passive tripled also BUT it is this way because of all the QQing about AFK farming in past accelerated SP events. We as a community made it this way. Suck it up.
Gÿó +¦ +¦ Gÿó
|
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
1831
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 11:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
They're probably keeping the events relatively small because they're planning something awesome for Christmas! We all know Icelandic Christmas' are insane.
I mean seriously, look at this: http://www.iceland.is/iceland-abroad/us/education-and-culture/curiosities/christmas-in-iceland/
Especially the paragraph titled "The Yule Lads".
'They are descendants of trolls and were originally used to scare children...'
I laughed. This should be the corporation name for CCP staff.
"..things that some people frankly don't even get the chance to do in real life, because it's poorly designed."
-Veigar
|
Vin Mora
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
176
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 13:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:I made more of a rant in the events thread, so I'll be a bit more civilized here.
CCP, I assume the "3x" SP (in quotes b/c that's not really what it is) event is intended to bring some players back and re-energize the player base, as well as give us some SP to use when 1.7 comes out. That's all fine and good but you are doing it wrong!
So, you triple the cap, which as I recall is a bit under 200k, we will round up to make the math easier. So, triple the cap is 600k. Not too shabby, I'd like to make that much in a week for sure. However, by only tripling SP from WP you take something that should reduce the grind into something that makes it worse
Maths (it's late so bear with me, I'm dumbing it down due to fatigue):
Normal conditions: Let's take the average halfway decent player, makes about 1000-1500 WP or so on average per game. Average game of skirmish takes 20 minutes? It comes out to around (again, rounding off to make the math easier) 10000 SP per match, 500 SP per minute. It takes roughly 20 battles to cap out, which, if Scotty really likes you, takes around 7-8 hours.
Actual triple SP: All SP from battles are tripled. Math is easy, you now make 30,000 SP per match, and cap out at 600,000 in the same 7-8 hours.
"Triple SP" as planned: You now get 3 SP per WP, which is still less than time based SP accrual, btw.
So, the average battle now nets you a grand total of (wait for it...) 2-3000 extra SP. THATS IT! Less impressive when you look at it that way, no?
So, now you make 13000 SP per game. To actually realize the promised tripled cap, you now have to play FORTY SIX battles to cap out, more than double! (600,000/13,000). So now it takes you 46x20/60 = 15 hours. - Let's say for the sake of argument you are ReGnYuM or something, and you make 4000SP per battle. You get 8000 extra SP per battle, let's call it 20,000 SP. You still have to fight 30 battles to cap out, so the argument that structuring the bonus this way rewards people who play well is still bogus because even an outlier who makes 4000WP a battle (if anyone can even average that, I have no idea) has to play more than usual to hit the new cap.
Please answer this question then. CCP: If you have a player base who already feels like there is an unnecessary amount of grinding involved, why the f-- would you give us a "bonus" event that makes us have to grind for twice as long!
The right way to do "triple SP" as a bonus? We put out the same time and effort to get triple the total SP.
Honestly, find me one person who complained after the true triple SP event that he or she just didn't have to work hard enough for it. "Please CCP, can I have the opportunity to grind twice as much?" Raise your hand. Anyone? No? I love how entitled people can be about a reason to play a game.
If you can't cap out that is fine you don't have too.
This event is for those people that cap out on Thursday or Friday, giving them a reason to keep playing afterwards.
Sanguis Defense Syndicate: Recruitment now open for players of all skill levels
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
327
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 17:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
It's not entitlement, I don't like being misled and I don't appreciate when pretty clear cut and easily understood feedback is ignored. Who honestly wants to grind more?
Your argument about this being for people who cap on Thursday makes nonsense since the whole point of even having a cap in the first place is so "no lifers" can't get an insurmountable lead in SP over everyone else.
If that was the case they may as well call it "Dust514 tryhard week".
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
|
bear90211
Nyain San Proficiency V.
43
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 17:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
hehehe, PASSIVE GAIN. that the stuff that PASSIVELY accumulates your SP, when you OFFLINE or NOT. its the stuff that builds out of battle, not in it dumbass, learn to read.
Heavies are still squishy to my AR, just 5 rounds into them extra ;D
hmm, I want taco's...
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
327
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 17:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
bear90211 wrote:hehehe, PASSIVE GAIN. that the stuff that PASSIVELY accumulates your SP, when you OFFLINE or NOT. its the stuff that builds out of battle, not in it dumbass, learn to read.
You're an idiot. Try reading it again. Passive BATTLE SP, which represents the majority of points most (if not all) players get from each battle. Have you received 30,000 SP from any battles today?
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
828
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 18:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
before you go building a long post like that, maybe read closer the things that you're addressing. just because you assume something doesn't mean that's what ccp had intended.
I read the rest of your post. it's sad.
you think that there's 'too much grind' in dust? go play something else. it takes me 2 or 3 days of the week to hit my cap, and the rest of the time i'm playing for 1500 wp a match.
I jdgaf if you're a mediocre player with a big mouth. |
low genius
The Sound Of Freedom Renegade Alliance
828
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 18:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:Exactly. The way the original post is worded makes it sound like a real triple SP week, but apparently it is not. Yet another bit of pretty clear-cut feedback from the player base to CCP that was completely ignored.
it seemed that way to people who can't read... |
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 19:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
If you think about it , the way that they did what they have done is more fair to the community as a whole . You said it yourself , " A fairly decent player " , now everyone is not that , considering how many proto stomping threads that are written , so with that in mind they took that into consideration and came up with a way , that those who are skillfully challenged could still benefit from it being placed in one lump sum and then dividing it up for them to be earned per game . This way everyone is treated fairly and they aren't slighted .
This was a good way to address this issue and to treat EVERYONE fairly . Good job CCP . Very adult and responsible , as well as thoughtful of you .
" Doubts are like flies and should be crushed !!!!!! " I hope that I am THE FLY SWATTER of those in my presence .
|
Soraya Xel
Violent Intervention Top Men.
739
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 19:21:00 -
[16] - Quote
AFKers ruined it for us. It might be better if it was like... five times our war points, so it'd have a stronger effect, but again, only on people playing. Realistically, since we have a passive SP system anyhow, our active SP should only be war point-based, to completely deter AFKers. You could have a temporary bonus for newer players, so that they do get the time-based SP as well for a certain period of time.
Top Men. - The DUST Arm of the CFC
www.dust-gents.com
Recruiting corporations and players now!
|
Shinobi MumyoSakanagare ZaShigurui
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 19:24:00 -
[17] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:AFKers ruined it for us. It might be better if it was like... five times our war points, so it'd have a stronger effect, but again, only on people playing. Realistically, since we have a passive SP system anyhow, our active SP should only be war point-based, to completely deter AFKers. You could have a temporary bonus for newer players, so that they do get the time-based SP as well for a certain period of time.
What is a AFKer ???
" Doubts are like flies and should be crushed !!!!!! " I hope that I am THE FLY SWATTER of those in my presence .
|
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics League of Infamy
333
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 22:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
low genius wrote:before you go building a long post like that, maybe read closer the things that you're addressing. just because you assume something doesn't mean that's what ccp had intended. I read the rest of your post. it's sad. you think that there's 'too much grind' in dust? go play something else. it takes me 2 or 3 days of the week to hit my cap, and the rest of the time i'm playing for 1500 wp a match. I jdgaf if you're a mediocre player with a big mouth.
If you have the time to play 4 hours a day and cap out that quickly, good for you. A lot of us have kids and have real jobs (I work up to 80 hours a week) and can't. I'm not the only person who thinks this, plenty of players much better than I am have voiced similar complaints. You don't agree, that's your opinion, and you are welcome to it. As am I.
I do enjoy the game, I just literally do not have time to cap out 90% of the time. I won't even come close this week. Again, my main problem is that similar feedback was given before and it was ignored. The original description of the event was vague and reality has disappointed those of who were looking forward to a real triple SP week. The other issue I have is that this only encourages the very behavior it allegedly is intended to combat, which is AFK. A more reasonable thing to do would be to increase he WP-SP to maybe 5, to actually make a big difference; that would reduce AFK, not a paltry 20-30% increase in SP gain.
Templar'd for her pleasure
Amarr victor!
|
SmokeyJay KillaKush
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 23:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
This event was misleading to me as well, I am NOT an afk player, I am new, I have a very rough time getting 4k sp, this is another reward to the top tier players, and a SEVERE kick to the sack of new players. All I have run into are proto squads all day... The only balance I see is for proto vs proto. I do not have the time to play this game much, and even with the passive out of battle sp does not help enough to compete. I cannot be that bad of a player, but going against crack squads who played since it started and are sitting at 30 million and more sp is plain out impossible. |
Pisidon Gmen
Ivory Vanguard
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 02:06:00 -
[20] - Quote
SmokeyJay KillaKush wrote:This event was misleading to me as well, I am NOT an afk player, I am new, I have a very rough time getting 4k sp, this is another reward to the top tier players, and a SEVERE kick to the sack of new players. All I have run into are proto squads all day... The only balance I see is for proto vs proto. I do not have the time to play this game much, and even with the passive out of battle sp does not help enough to compete. I cannot be that bad of a player, but going against crack squads who played since it started and are sitting at 30 million and more sp is plain out impossible.
i feel the same way 3 time the grind 4 this event with little reward i left over 400k sp unearned as 4 the afk players (afk is away from keybord) (farming pts this still happends all the time meaning they join the game but don't activaly play) boot players who don't die or get pts this will stop players from sitting in game
i also only seamed to play vs proto squads all the time but the last day and i am not a true noob i have 8 mill lifetime sp but i had a very hard time making more then 5 k sp this event mostly do to the op of the assault rifles there is no way to win vs them there dps is too high esp when u add skills that add to damage and damage mods triple sp event was a bad way to discribe this event
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |