|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:13:00 -
[1] - Quote
Foxhound Elite wrote:I like to see people giving out about the upcoming changes to AV. You've had it coming, and stop complaining about how it's going to look about in the future vs. Tanks. I see nobodys saying 'but we won't have any way to fend off stomping dropship pilots' , ... it's because dropship pilots rarely get a chance to make any impact. Why, you say? Because it only takes one swarm launcher, one forge gunner or one rail installation user to remove the threat of even the most skilled of pilots from the battlefield. Stop your whining, you'll have together to take out vehicles, which is what it should be. Vehicle users spend more ISK and SP than you, in an open one vs one battle, they should always crush you. Only where you use your surroundings and fellow teammates to help, then you should overcome the vehicular opposition, unless they fail due to pilot error otherwise. +1 beer to you.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Foxhound Elite wrote:I like to see people giving out about the upcoming changes to AV. You've had it coming, and stop complaining about how it's going to look about in the future vs. Tanks. I see nobodys saying 'but we won't have any way to fend off stomping dropship pilots' , ... it's because dropship pilots rarely get a chance to make any impact. Why, you say? Because it only takes one swarm launcher, one forge gunner or one rail installation user to remove the threat of even the most skilled of pilots from the battlefield. Stop your whining, you'll have together to take out vehicles, which is what it should be. Vehicle users spend more ISK and SP than you, in an open one vs one battle, they should always crush you. Only where you use your surroundings and fellow teammates to help, then you should overcome the vehicular opposition, unless they fail due to pilot error otherwise. Im not crying, im learning how to drive tanks....BTW this: '' Vehicle users spend more ISK and SP than you, in an open one vs one battle, they should always crush you. '' Is the most stupid thing i've read. If this game ends up being: Better equipment > Skill IM LEAVING.I dont give a flying f*** if your tank costs 50 million isk, if im better i should be able to drop your butt. PERIOD. @ the end of the day, as you said, is 1 on 1 , you are just wearing a mechanical, more expensive suit.... A 1 on 1 battle that cannot be won no matter what , makes a game broken. Let me guess, you want your Duvolle to be able to destroy that 50mil ISK tank in less than two magazines?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:How about this: LIGHT AV weapons should be good at taking out light vehicles, but ineffective at taking out heavy vehicles, while heavy AV kills all vehicles relatively quickly. Doesn't that make sense? It makes too much sense, which is why infantry won't allow it.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:Justin Tymes wrote:Yet another "X SP should mean superiority" thread. Save your SP > skill rant for when 1.7 comes out. Your roll eyes emote and your 1 line dismissive response lies on-top of a confusing point. Your say that SP should not add value, i.e superior abilities or gear. If this is not the function of SP as you say then what do you think skill points should do? What are they for in your version of DUST? By your logic, and the OPs, when i have 20 millions SP (in about a week or two) and since i spent almost all of it in AV (Have everything proto) and suits and skills for using it, then, NO VEHICLE USER UNDER 20mill SP should be able to survive one of my AV attacks? Seems fun. TY It doesn't take 20 mil SP to use AV well. Not even close. Less than a million gets Aurum PRO AV.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 23:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote: It doesn't take 20 mil SP to use AV well. Not even close.
Well of course not, who said that>? not me for sure. But again thats not what we are talking about here godin. :3 You said you spent almost all of it into AV, so es you did. Its impossible spending 20 mill into AV. Remember ; the only way to harm vehicles is with 4 weapons. Which except plasma cannon i have all proto, and the suits with proto modules,proficiency ,etc... needed to fully run them. So you say you have almost 20 mil into AV, then say it's not possible to spend 20 mil in AV. So what is it?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 03:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:I think Void Echo skipped debating 101 class ! Actually, we win our arguments with lists, comparisons, facts, and above all, math.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 03:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Void Echo wrote:answer my question:
why should I put all of my personal investment and skill into tanks when a heavy who has put so little investment into his would be far more efficient? what would be the point of skilling into something if another thing could do its job better at a much lower investment requirement?
also, where would be the balance between "skill" and personal investment in this game when "skill would completely denounce logic when fighting far superior equipment? A heavy is not far more efficient at killing than a tank. The current state of heavies is laughable. Your second question does not make sense. I have a rough idea of what you're talking about though - Are you saying that if you have superior equipment you should be completely unkillable by inferior equipment? If so, then I disagree. Strenuously. This game already has enough problems with newbie stomping without it becoming literally impossible for newbies to compete. lolwut
A forge gun is far more efficient than any tank turret at destroying a tank.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 03:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Void Echo wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Void Echo wrote:answer my question:
why should I put all of my personal investment and skill into tanks when a heavy who has put so little investment into his would be far more efficient? what would be the point of skilling into something if another thing could do its job better at a much lower investment requirement?
also, where would be the balance between "skill" and personal investment in this game when "skill would completely denounce logic when fighting far superior equipment? A heavy is not far more efficient at killing than a tank. The current state of heavies is laughable. Your second question does not make sense. I have a rough idea of what you're talking about though - Are you saying that if you have superior equipment you should be completely unkillable by inferior equipment? If so, then I disagree. Strenuously. This game already has enough problems with newbie stomping without it becoming literally impossible for newbies to compete. look at my post on this page. also that was an example. and btw heavies are more efficient than tanks are money wise. if im going against a full team of proto suits in only a militia suit, should I be able to wipe the floor with them? Oh yes, more efficient isk wise. My BPO suits are infinitely efficient, whilst we're on that subject. Perhaps you should drop everything and run for them if that's so important? A heavy suit is not as effective at killing as a tank is, nor is it as durable. Not efficient, effective. Part of what balances spending large amounts of isk are diminishing returns per isk. Otherwise prototype suits would be even more powerful and actually sustainable - neither of which would be good for the game. Similarly, you pay for the power of HAVs. You can ***** and whine about how you don't think you're invincible enough, but you are investing isk for more power. That's a ridiculously loaded example. Obviously not - not only is your gear outmatched, you are also outnumbered. Even if they're complete retards you're going to get wrecked. The examples I was giving were where skill could tip the scales, not make everything else completely irrelevant. You have to be deliberately misinterpreting me now because I honestly believe someone can't be that stupid. I'm done. I tried to be reasonable with you. It took 6 pages, but I've realised you can't be reasoned with. Congratulations. Of course you can make ISK using PRO suits, they nerfed the price by a hell of a lot.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 04:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Infantry, have to intelligently use AV? What is this madness?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1159
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 11:06:00 -
[10] - Quote
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote:
recently i have been doing nothing but using militia suits , every now and then ill switch to my av suit to go after a tank that is going unchecked 8/10 times i get killed before i get any where near the tank 1/10 ill be able to do some damage but the tank runs away 1/10 the tank just sits there untill its on fire and then starts to run but its too late already. Now with me using my militia gear suits i do perfectly fine, not amazing but i can hold my own. personal investment does indeed help but i believe that skill gets you farther.
Why are you unnecessarily exposing yourself?
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
|
|