|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
   |
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Lai Dai deals somewhere around 1700 damage At least try using them 
Base damage is 1764, with damage bonus against armor we're looking at around 2000 damage.
Yes, they're pathetically easy to use, and far too effective for their ease of use. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shattered Mirage wrote:
Yes, yes your arguments are weak based on the fact that all you tend to insult others and sprout bullshit out of your mouth instead of giving facts, numbers, videos, and other types of evidence like many others have.
When you stop being pathetic and actually listen, consider, and compare these pieces of evidence and base a conclusion off of that, then people might start to actually take you seriously again.
Don't base your argument on hearsay and prejudice, it typically ends up embarrassing you.
Like I keep telling him, if he really was a tanker, he wouldn't be on a crusade against tanks. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:Takahiros 'partner' will be here shortly to reply 10 times to each individual comment from anyone who isn't supporting the HAV campaign ... you wait n see lol ... You were right and the best thing: his fbuddy isn't even a tanker, lol.
So you think.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:
That would be because in every match there is at least one HAV that would just sit there spamming infinate ammo at spawn points ... infantry have had to adapt or die ... literally !
So infantry can spawn elsewhere with swarms and start sending them towards the tank.
And don't you start talking about infantry having to adapt or die. Tankers have had to do that through 5 or 6 builds now, and we're apparently still going strong, due to the amount of complaining infantry is doing about us. Ever wonder why that is? Maybe it's because tankers are more intelligent; more aware of their surroundings, and strengths and weaknesses, when to engage and when to break contact, and how to fit their vehicle?
Tanks are pathetically easy to destroy. I have 0 problem going after a tank with somebody to make sure we get the kill.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
Toby Flenderson wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Atiim wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Atiim wrote:Lai Dai deals somewhere around 1700 damage At least try using them Once again read the post Mr. I have no idea about resist. The numbers don't add up and real word evidence suggests else wise. Go away troll. Your ideas are not valid on anything related with vehicles. You have no idea about anything I just posted. Once again, I already knew about hardners, I just didn't use them (or nitrous And if your using that logic, the why not HTFU about AV as you sure as heck don't use them or have any idea of what your talking about when it comes to AV And if you look at the marketplace stats, they do around 1720 damage. Right from my post 1720 dmg *1.35 armor efficiency*1.3 weak spot glitch=3018.6 dmg. The weak spot seams to be all over the tank, which then makes all of CCP's AV grenade numbers off by a factor between 1.5 or 2. Prove my math wrong please. I don't think this is right either from experience but I'm willing to listen to reason if you have some explanation for the very common scenario I'll share with you. I try to take out tanks with PLC and Lai Dai grenades in the following obvious way... 1. PLC the shields away 2. Toss the Lai Dais 3. Try to hit it with the PLC if it survives I probably have about a 50% success rate after step 3. If your 3,000 damage figure is correct than they would have to have over 9,000 armor. This is rarely the case as I have squad mates tell me how much armor it has at full before I chase after it so that I can act accordingly. Typically I hear numbers between 5,000-7,000 armor. Shields are more than destroyed by my proto to PLC so I can only assume that all 9,000 damage goes into the tanks armor. I understand that tanks have resistance and reps but for how fast this all happens I don't see how they can survive roughly 11,000 damage in about 4 seconds when caught off guard followed by another PLC shot half of the time. If I am just missing some huge mechanic to tanking or messing up on math please let me know. But if you're claiming CCP has lied about the damage done by AV nades then I'd be interested in hearing your explanation for these encounters and how the grenades still can't destroy weakened tanks.
Because heavy armor reppers are amazing.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1149
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:17:00 -
[6] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Atiim wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:Wait correct me if im wrong but the best way to use the swarm launcher now is to do taliban style ambushes  ? It's always been that way. AV is only OP in the eyes of QQers like Void and Tankashiro because they are biased, and have never gone up against people with AV that don't hide in the redline. And now AV is on the chop block because CCP has to many buckets of thier tears don't bring me into this scrub... im done arguing and debating the non-existing balance.. especially with biased pricks like you. the biggest thing going against you is that you are a tank driver yet your advocating tanks being nerfed even more so that even complete retards like you can solo your own tank by yourself with militia AV. your a giant contradiction and will never have any respect from anyone other than lukeboy and the others who have stated before that they want this to be call of duty without vehicles.
He doesn't know the first, second or third things about tanking, because he's lying. I'd love to know how his tank is fit out.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1169
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Vehicles have PRO weapons and PRO modules.
All they need is ADV and PRO hulls
LOL We don't have PRO modules.
See, I told you you're not a tanker.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1169
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:34:00 -
[8] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Atiim wrote:Vehicles have PRO weapons and PRO modules.
All they need is ADV and PRO hulls LOL We don't have PRO modules. See, I told you you're not a tanker. we don't have proto modules or hulls, we have proto turrets... modules are categorized as follows: Basic, enhanced, complex. there are no advanced or proto modules, only proto turrets.
They'll be basic, enhanced and complex when the vehicle pass comes.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
| |
|