|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kane Fyea
DUST University
Ivy League
2142
   |
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just one thing, my swarms do 120% damage vs armor not 135%.
Finally.
|
Kane Fyea
DUST University
Ivy League
2142
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Just one thing, my swarms do 120% damage vs armor not 135%. Just tested it too. That number is wrong based on the numbers I have witnessed. The efficiency must be 135% w/o damage mods. Don't beleive it just because CCP says it. Ex. AV grenades, player counts, small rails being top sellers, etc...
No I know it's right because I just went and saw the efficiency vs armor in game and my main weapon is the swarms (Been using them since I started playing dust). If you want I can do further tests to prove you wrong.
Finally.
|
Kane Fyea
DUST University
Ivy League
2142
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Just one thing, my swarms do 120% damage vs armor not 135%. Just tested it too. That number is wrong based on the numbers I have witnessed. The efficiency must be 135% w/o damage mods. Don't beleive it just because CCP says it. Ex. AV grenades, player counts, small rails being top sellers, etc... No I know it's right because I just went and saw the efficiency vs armor (120% vs armor and 80% vs shields) in game and my main weapon is the swarms (Been using them since I started playing dust). If you want I can do further tests to prove you wrong. What part of don't believe everything they display/write/say they have altered so many things that there is bound to be a coding glitch or something out there. Ex. AV grenades, player counts, small rails being top sellers, etc... these are all blantant lies or construed data.
I think CCP is more of a credible source then you ever will. Show me proof or else I will never believe you.
Actually fk it I'll do another test to prove you wrong with proof this time.
Also I can believe rails being the top seller thanks to redline tanks.
Finally.
|
Kane Fyea
DUST University
Ivy League
2142
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
KenKaniff69 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:KenKaniff69 wrote:
That number is wrong based on the numbers I have witnessed. The efficiency must be 135% w/o damage mods. Don't beleive it just because CCP says it. Ex. AV grenades, player counts, small rails being top sellers, etc...
No I know it's right because I just went and saw the efficiency vs armor (120% vs armor and 80% vs shields) in game and my main weapon is the swarms (Been using them since I started playing dust). If you want I can do further tests to prove you wrong. What part of don't believe everything they display/write/say they have altered so many things that there is bound to be a coding glitch or something out there. Ex. AV grenades, player counts, small rails being top sellers, etc... these are all blantant lies or construed data. I think CCP is more of a credible source then you ever will. Show me proof or else I will never believe you. Actually fk it I'll do another test to prove you wrong with proof this time. Also I can believe rails being the top seller thanks to redline tanks. small rails? are you serious? try and kill someone with one of these CCP darling creations
Small rails no although that maybe because that most AUR tanks come with two small rails.
Finally.
|
|
|
| |
|