| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
CharCharOdell
Shining Flame
Amarr Empire
1344
   |
Posted - 2013.10.28 19:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:So, you want to be dominant and not just balanced?  Tanks should be dominant. Dominance for them is balance for the game. They are bigger, more expensive, and require a massive SP sink to use properly. If you can solo one of these things, why the hell would you ever invest in one?
hmmm...since im going rail i might play doms bc all the reds like to be in one place at a time. |
daishi mk03
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
279
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 19:49:00 -
[32] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:hmmm...since im going rail i might play doms bc all the reds like to be in one place at a time.
shield or armor? |
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S.
Public Disorder.
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 02:05:00 -
[33] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:Commander Tzu wrote:Thumb Green wrote:Stupid tankers will still be solo-able, with militia swarms no less, and we all know there is no shortage in them.
Edit: Also I just love how tankers are talking about AV'ers not knowing how to use teamwork when they themselves only recently learned to use it and yet for the most part still don't use it. Lol, guess Chromosome is recent. More like in the last 2 months (even then it's mostly just to have a tank or LLAV follow behind repping); the tank spam in chromosome doesn't count as teamwork. Most tankers still don't have infantry squad members support them nor do they intentionally have any gunners.
Really? Because I know plenty of AVers complaining about having to have multiple people attack a tank specifically because his squad members will gun them down before they can kill it. Plenty of tanks moved with their infantry in Chromosome, only difference was, tanks could actually see more than 100 meters in front of them so railguns were a viable option, and as a long range weapon they worked best supporting infantry from as far away as possible. As for gunners, I would agree, it's really hard to intentionally have gunners in your tank when blueberries get in ASAP and camp it the whole game. And just to clarify, I saw plenty of spider tanking in Chromosome (usually because I was one of them).
|
Keri Starlight
Psygod9
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
962
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 02:49:00 -
[34] - Quote
Harpyja wrote:
In the end, current AV infantry will have to live with their decision. So what's your choice? Respec out of AV because you won't be able to solo us any more? Or keep your AV and learn to use teamwork in bring us down?
Edit: if you're already using teamwork, kudos to you!
They WILL be able to solo us, since our HP are going down just like the AV damage. We're getting better hardeners but our passive resistance will be gone. We're getting full time working repairers but they're going to be much weaker. We're going to have limited ammo and slot layout as well.
I can't see that much of a change about Vehicles / AV balance.
-Caldari Achura - One with the Universe
-Tac AR Specialist
"I load my gun with love instead of bullets"
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3770
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 02:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:Harpyja wrote:
In the end, current AV infantry will have to live with their decision. So what's your choice? Respec out of AV because you won't be able to solo us any more? Or keep your AV and learn to use teamwork in bring us down?
Edit: if you're already using teamwork, kudos to you!
They WILL be able to solo us, since our HP are going down just like the AV damage. We're getting better hardeners but our passive resistance will be gone. We're getting full time working repairers but they're going to be much weaker. We're going to have limited ammo and slot layout as well. I can't see that much of a change about Vehicles / AV balance.
I don't use any passive resistance modules so its not like its going to affect me...
Either way let us REIGN!
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
|
True Adamance
PIE Inc.
Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
3770
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 02:56:00 -
[36] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:So, you want to be dominant and not just balanced? Tanks should be dominant. Dominance for them is balance for the game. They are bigger, more expensive, and require a massive SP sink to use properly. If you can solo one of these things, why the hell would you ever invest in one?
How many times in recent history I have been FWing, seen the enemy pop tanks onto the map and watch with glee as our crappy blue dots die, all the while my squad is wondering if I'm going to go down there and deal with them.
All I say is.
"This is what happens when you don't respect the Tank, ya get ****** up."
"All things were created by the Divine, and so the glory of our faith is inherent to us all"
|
Cody Sietz
Bullet Cluster
Legacy Rising
1316
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 02:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Tanks will stop tanks.
And so both, tankers and infantry have fun.
If there is an enemy tank on the field, a tanker loses every interest in killing infantry.
And if the enemy has a tank on the field and you don't, your F***ED!
Oh well. |
Meeko Fent
expert intervention
Caldari State
1337
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 04:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cody Sietz wrote:daishi mk03 wrote:Tanks will stop tanks.
And so both, tankers and infantry have fun.
If there is an enemy tank on the field, a tanker loses every interest in killing infantry. And if the enemy has a tank on the field and you don't, your F***ED! Oh well.
And if NOBODY has a militia tank on your team, then your team is very close minded.
Then your AV comes in.
If your million ISK investment is even threatened, don't you think your going to try to keep it safe?
Having 890 damage appear out of nowhere is definately going to scare a tanker into backing off.
It's like when a HMG 40 meters out hits you. Do you not still take cover?
Meeko's Novelty Shop Opening Soon!
We (will)sell all the novelty items you desire! Really!
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |