Feedback: the font on those charts... The 6s look like 8s.
Also, Combat Rifles look like they don't use much resources, even at prototype.

I was hoping the Combat Rifle would have a burst variant that had Iron Sights, just to mix things up a bit. I like the burst firing action but I really am not a fan of the scopes. Maybe the CR scopes will be different, but I would still like to see iron sight burst. Think about it

if i hold down R1 when using the rail rifle is it going to do this

Charge pew pew pew pew pew

or

Charge pew Charge pew Charge pew

Also the rail rifle is going to have a 0.2 second charge up time before every shot, so that means every shot is effectively going to lag 0.2 seconds which sounds like a fair trade off to me. The rail rifle will be much better at range and suffer tremendously in close combat to the Gallente assault rifle.

Laser rifle is not part of the same class of weapons. Just because it says "rifle" doesn't mean you should compare it with assault rifle, scrambler rifles, combat rifles, and rail rifles. I mean, by that case we should also be trying to compare sniper rifles in this group as well.

After swarms got buffed I always said the best way to fix swarms is cut their range in half. Nothing more fair than a swarm user unloading 3 volleys of swarms doing 5940 damage. That's before damage mods and prof.

I've had a commando fire 3 volleys of proto swarms and switch to his second Wyrikomi swarm launcher and fire 3 more.

The only weapon I'm quite worried about at the moment is the Scrambler Rifle.

Looking at the proto assault variant it requires less CPU and just 2 PG more than the Duvolle AR, but has an optimal range comparable to the current Tactical AR. It is full-auto, deals comparable amounts of damage per second and has a significantly larger clipsize, reloads faster and has a red dot sight.

I'm not calling it OP yet, but looking at the stats I guess this will be a VERY good weapon.

So, will the range buffs to the Scrambler Rifle result in the semi-auto version getting a scope? As it's designed as a longer range weapon, I think it really needs one.

It'd be nice to have the Laser Rifle receive an "ACOG" sight as well, actually. They're both meant to be longer range weapons but are only equipped with reflex sights.

I'm raising concerns and giving feedback based on the stats we have. This has nothing to do with QQ-ing. Quite the contrary. I expect CCP to be VERY careful concerning balancing in order to avoid having to rebalance weapons again, which - as they said during EVE Vegas - costs them a lot of time and money.

From the stats I gathered here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AkgH4oyiFeUAdFpjQW0wRExKazF6empxY0R2Rm9iV3c&usp=sharing#gid=0 the SR to me looks like it has the potential to be phenomenally good.

In a highly competitive environment like Planetary Conquest no one gives a **** about a mere +30k ISK per clone or those ~31k SP you need for Prof. 1.

But this is what I think about this weapon and if my feedback makes CCP take another look at the SRs stats even if they don't change a thing because the data gathered during playtesting did not raise any balancing concerns then I consider this a success.

BOO. ****ING. HOO. Now you'll need to be within render distance to completely murder a tank.

seeing how the full auto rail rifle and the combat rifles are gunna have a acog scopes will the gallante rifle be getting one to?

What's the plasma rifle? New? :3