|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1076
   |
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:26:00 -
[1] - Quote
21yrOld Knight wrote:I would like to report from dust charts that Sver True Blood Lost its last district at around 1:00 Eve time. I must ask how many did you guys sell before total defeat.
Also a couple weeks ago one of your members was asking for there to war. If i remember correctly he said just a minor war not one that destroys corps. I warned him that if war was to happen then it would destroy one side completely. To the member of STB that wanted war. Did you get what you wanted ?
Lol, the state of a corps hold on land does not reflect on how the corp is actually doing. If you think our corp is "destroyed" then your crazy. We went into the war with promises of help and more manpower. That help never came, and because of it we were unable to satisfy the requirements our battle plan needed to be successful. This lead to defeat when several disconnect issues caused most of our directors to not be on at key district timers, and without the support of the people who said they would we were unable to effectively swamp the AE alliance like we wanted to.
Our corp lost its land, yes. But its only a matter of time before we recover. Like we always do. Kind of like one of those major banks over here in America: "Too big to fail" |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1080
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 16:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Superhero Rawdon wrote:wuts even more funny, is that 21 takes credit for the war itself. u can see that bullsnot on our website shoutbox http://highdamagegaming.enjin.com/page 7 of the shoutbox is where he starts his babbling the guy is a delusional idiot and pradox didnt take our districts, OH did. like its been said, pradox/px1 (wutever) arent good enough to battle themselves. they need big brothers (OH, AE) to fight for them.
The few matches I played Px1, we kicked their teeth in. They really aren't much without the help of their big brothers, and the only reason they hold as much land as they do is because they've been constantly attacking every single one of their districts (with the exception of like 2-3) with an alt corp. So idk...... they can brag about the war and who won all they want, but im sure they all realize who really won the war for them, and that was none other then AE. |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1083
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gods Architect wrote:this thread needs to be killed. This thread does not reflect of the thoughts and views of PX1, and we do apologize for this unfortunate behavior. Public Disorder and Teamplayers fought a good fight and the alliance is currently in talks about returning Sver Prime back to Sver. Once again we sincerely apologize.
Gods ARchitect, I wouldn't have said any of that if I remembered you were in this guys corp. Just a little chest beating in this thread, nothing more! I like you because of all those epic stories you posted day by day, and your right in saying both sides put up a good fight. Ill watch what I say about Px1 from now on, it just annoyed me that a guy from a corp I only saw in like 20% of the battles (I fought in) was getting all hyped about us losing our last district. That being said, there are certainly many good players in Px1 so its whatever. Keep up the good work man! and don't make the same mistakes we did! (cuz then you'll lose all your land  ) |
Marston VC
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1084
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Roy Ventus wrote:Marston VC wrote:21yrOld Knight wrote:I would like to report from dust charts that Sver True Blood Lost its last district at around 1:00 Eve time. I must ask how many did you guys sell before total defeat.
Also a couple weeks ago one of your members was asking for there to war. If i remember correctly he said just a minor war not one that destroys corps. I warned him that if war was to happen then it would destroy one side completely. To the member of STB that wanted war. Did you get what you wanted ? Lol, the state of a corps hold on land does not reflect on how the corp is actually doing. If you think our corp is "destroyed" then your crazy. We went into the war with promises of help and more manpower. That help never came, and because of it we were unable to satisfy the requirements our battle plan needed to be successful. This lead to defeat when several disconnect issues caused most of our directors to not be on at key district timers, and without the support of the people who said they would we were unable to effectively swamp the AE alliance like we wanted to. Our corp lost its land, yes. But its only a matter of time before we recover. Like we always do. Kind of like one of those major banks over here in America: "Too big to fail" On the bolded part...I beg to disagree. Loss of land from a large landowner could mean a lot of things from lost of skill, not being strong enough, or even boredom(looks at Eon). While it doesn't have to mean one thing all of the time, a massive loss of land ALWAYS reflects on how the corp is actually doing. >.> It's usually not good...
It doesn't though...... A broken game mechanic that only serves to produce Isk out of thin air does not reflect the state of a corp. It doesn't mean anything good that we lost the land, but I never claimed it to be a good thing in the first place. STB has lost our land. All 20+ districts are gone. Okay...... what do we have to fall back on? 10% tax on a 400 strong player base. We failed at holding our land for the reasons I described above, not for any of the "supposed" reasons you mentioned. Nothing more, nothing less. Besides that, your generalizations really have nothing to back them up other then the fact that its your opinion...... |
|
|
| |
|