|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4094
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Says they're not in an alliance but won't attack CRONOS or "former" CRONOS corps... lol
Good one man |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4094
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Says they're not in an alliance but won't attack CRONOS or "former" CRONOS corps... lol Good one man An alliance involves coordinated tactics. What's described here is little more than one half of a mutual nonaggression pact.
It's alliance still. Just because they're not coordinating with each other has no effect on this lol
Just because they don't have an alliance below their name doesn't mean squat either. Maphia Clan is in CRONOS, and not attacking their allies only cements this.
If there were other corps on that list that were never part of CRONOS i would agree it's a none aggression deal, but lol. All the corps there belongs / belonged to CRONOS... aka, the EU Donut.
Only corp not there is Betamax... simply because they no longer exist... at least AFAIC |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4096
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Says they're not in an alliance but won't attack CRONOS or "former" CRONOS corps... lol Good one man An alliance involves coordinated tactics. What's described here is little more than one half of a mutual nonaggression pact. It's alliance still. Just because they're not coordinating with each other has no effect on this lol Just because they don't have an alliance below their name doesn't mean squat either. Maphia Clan is in CRONOS, and not attacking their allies only cements this. If there were other corps on that list that were never part of CRONOS i would agree it's a none aggression deal, but lol. All the corps there belongs / belonged to CRONOS... aka, the EU Donut. Only corp not there is Betamax... simply because they no longer exist... at least AFAIC You're just broadening the meaning of the term "alliance" until it fits the what you want to say about them.
meh. Doesn't matter what you or me term it as. Fact is they're not attacking corps they were allied with before, and are still saying "they not in alliance" lol... this is a joke.
"Hey guys, we'll ring for people except against the EU corps!" which happens to be corps in CRONOS
How cute |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4100
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:
If you're calling it an alliance, then of course it matters what you mean by the word. You're trying to have it both ways here.
I don't see how a definition of a word matters.
Behind closed doors they're an alliance. In public they're acting as though they're not in one.
My opinion of what it is, is different to yours. So your definition by default is also different. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4101
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
So people need an "official" name below their corp name to be considered in an alliance? If so lol @ your definition of being in an alliance.
EoN is an alliance in DUST and on other games. We don't have any official press release for other games. Behind closed doors, or public everyone knows where we stand.
Here you have a corp pretending to NOT be in an alliance, yet they are in one
You say they're in a none aggressive deal? sure |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4102
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:So people need an "official" name below their corp name to be considered in an alliance? If so lol @ your definition of being in an alliance. EoN is an alliance in DUST and on other games. We don't have any official press release for other games. Behind closed doors, or public everyone knows where we stand. Here you have a corp pretending to NOT be in an alliance, yet they are in one You say they're in a none aggressive deal? sure I didn't say they need an official title to be in an alliance. Please don't put words in my mouth. What you're doing is called equivocation: trying to tie the connotations of the specific use of a word to more vague definition. An actual alliance would be sustained co-ordinated efforts. Your attempt at metagaming is transparent.
metagaming? hahahaha
Bro, I haven't played this game in about a month.
Just saying, what happening in this thread is a joke. Pretending to not be in an alliance? Then want to call me out for trying to metagame?
Lol...I'll wait till I hear about this group in PS2. But but, they're not an alliance! How can they be working together?! I thought they were just not attacking each other! lol
I'll see them in PS2 I'm sure. EU Donuts ftw, even if they're "not in an alliance"
|
|
|
|