|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
229
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 23:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
How many matches have I lost because over a third of my team was sniping from our red line or high towers?
Too many.
And the worst part is that CCP removed all forms of team killing, so you can't even vent your frustration on the real reason the team is losing. If an enemy is kicking your ass, at least you can shoot at them. But blueberry dead weight snipers, you can't even run them over anymore. |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
230
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 00:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:So the problem would be too many snipers, not hitting their targets, not getting to where the targets are. Even a redline sniper is useful if it gives a good vantage point to hit targets and to observe enemy activity. I don't see how you having to be able to shoot a sniper with an assault rifle matters except to give you an easier kill. You think simply killing enemies with a sniper rifle is contributing to the team? Noob. Your obviously one of those KDR whores who red-line snipe to pad their KDR. And now your trying to justify your worthlessness in matches as something noble.
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:And you want to run you own team over? Who's being useless now? There are people trying to do their part and people who b*tch about others. Who's more useful? Who's more useful? The guys who spent majority of the match trying to take and hold objectives but failed because they where completely outnumbered due to the fact that a significant portion of their team was too busy squatting with their sniper rifles doing nothing productive for the team.
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:Get a sniper rifle, counter snipe. Counter sniping friendly dead weight snipers doesn't do anything. |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
230
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 01:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:Lol, you missed my statement about that otherwise.
You are no good being another tryhard assault getting mowed down when you could be shooting more guys with a sniper rifle or at least forcing their movements ( and when you say "failed because they were completely outnumbered" then the kills apparently matter). I've been more useful as a sniper than being just another assault up against a group of reds. Too often I've been assaulting and had zero help when the team is mostly assaults. Useless is a relative term.
Hold objectives? It's when you aren't doing that that a sniper's job kicks in. Again, just another assault doesn't cut it. Oh! I see. I understand you now. What your saying is red-line snipers actually prevent objectives from being overrun. Too bad experience has shown me that an entire team of red-line snipers cant hold jack ****.
Now don't get me wrong, there are useful snipers out there. It's just that you, a red-line sniper, aren't one of the useful ones; in fact I'd go so far to say that you negatively impact your own team.
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:I think it's funny though that the term coward would be applied to combat in a video game. Try doing or being in a position to do it in RL. They're allowed to label you, a red-line sniper, "coward" because you stay far away from majority of the in game hazards. And its funny that you mention real life because all the dangers your too cowardly to get close to in game aren't even real.
Furthermore sniping in this game is nothing like having to snipe in a real war zone. |
medomai grey
WarRavens League of Infamy
232
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 03:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: And yetGǪ I didn't say I'm a redline sniper. I said that sniping from the redline makes no difference if you have a good vantage point and can get the shots. The redline on some maps is a better vantage point because you are up high and can see over things like roofs and railings. Redline is also a valid consideration for a sniper because you want your rear protected.
You want to operate as undetectable as possible. Redline can help with that. A sniper down in the sh*t is a bad sniper no matter how "useful" they might be. It doesn't mean more and better shots. You are at a disadvantage with a sniper rifle that close in. You are a great marksman though! I use a tac rifle if I want to go marksman though.
And it's funny. I know I must not be in the redline often because someone seems to come up behind me and shoots me.
So, once again we have a sniper thread with ppl who don't like sniping and slam all snipers only to have the argument get whittled down to what it's really about GÇö bad players, no matter the role and players who don't seem to be stroking the assaults.
Seriously, if assaults did their job the snipers wouldn't have to take the blame. From my vantage point that is usually the case; a bunch of assaults who can't hold an objective and one more assault doesn't help the matter.
So from your perspective its completely reasonable to expect 5-6 guys to defend or take an objective from the entire enemy team... Yea... that's completely reasonable... in an asylum. Although I do concede that there are some very oblivious non-sniping blueberries out there. The fact remains that teams primarily composed of red-line or tower snipers lose. Trying to argue that dead weight is an asset is insanity.
Also, people are not criticizing all snipers. They're criticizing the snipers who spend the entire match in the red-line or high points. Yes you are right, it is fine to utilize the red-line or high points to achieve a vantage point on a specific target; but you shouldn't be dead weight by spending the entire game there, especially if your not guarding an objective.
I'd argue about your vendetta against assault suit users if it weren't for the fact that there's some truth to it. Those petitions to nerf the logistic suits can get pretty stupid. Also your expectations give assaults way too much credit in what they can actually contribute in game; there are other roles and suits in this game besides snipers and assaults. |
|
|
|