|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1465
   |
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Make an assault rifle's effective range at 35m? LOLLL! Surely you jest sir, surely. No AR weapon effective range stops at 35m. And it can't be a glorified SMG.
Some folks don't have a clue about what they are expressing about the weaponry... |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1467
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vesago Ghostcore wrote:I have been killed by AR's. I have been killed by Mass Drivers. I have been killed by HMG's, Scrambler Rifles, Laser Rifles, Flaylocks, Scrambler Pistols, Shot guns, Tanks, Dropships, Rail turrets, Blaster Turrets, Nova Knives, Plasma Cannons, SMG's, Grenades, Fast moving LAv's. I have been killed by all of these things, from Standard to Proto. Ive even had every kind of vehicle land on my head and kill me.
Everything in this game is lethal, its all just a matter of preference when we choose a weapon to kill each other with. Because you choose not to use AR's or maybe your just not any good with them, is no reason to type out countless posts about nerfing/rebalancing them. If you think it kills best or that its over powered... buy them and kill your friends with them. If CCP chooses to listen to you and nerf the weapon you disapprove of, it can only lead to one thing.
AR nerf happens...
one week later
Mass Drivers are OP!!! CCP nerf/rebalance them... Nerf happens.
one week later
HMG's are OP!!! CCP nerf/rebalance them... Nerf happens.
eventually... it rolls back around to...
AR's are OP!!! CCP nerf/rebalance them...
Leave it alone,. and CCP will determine whats OP and nerf at their convenience.
That is effectively what's happening. Why I like to provide counter arguments to some areas so that both sides of the coin is fully realized. If we keep nerfing, we'll actually be playing with Nerf weapons instead of weapons of the future.
I respect mercenaries who master their weapons. I don't look for a nerf of the AR because the majority of the mercenaries on ground are assault players which uses ARs. It's common. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1467
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 02:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Make an assault rifle's effective range at 35m? LOLLL! Surely you jest sir, surely. No AR weapon effective range stops at 35m. And it can't be a glorified SMG.
Some folks don't have a clue about what they are expressing about the weaponry... We also dont have short range plasma blasters in real life gallente are supposed to have the shortest range of all the racial tech by far
Okay I'll bite...
So weapons of the future should only have an effective range of 35m? Do you know how far 35m is? That's highly laughable to say that weapons of the future have an effective range of 35m, especially when we are in dropsuits that are constructed to optimize our performance. |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1468
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 03:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:Michael Arck wrote:demonkiller 12 wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Make an assault rifle's effective range at 35m? LOLLL! Surely you jest sir, surely. No AR weapon effective range stops at 35m. And it can't be a glorified SMG.
Some folks don't have a clue about what they are expressing about the weaponry... We also dont have short range plasma blasters in real life gallente are supposed to have the shortest range of all the racial tech by far Okay I'll bite... So weapons of the future should only have an effective range of 35m? Do you know how far 35m is? That's highly laughable to say that weapons of the future have an effective range of 35m, especially when we are in dropsuits that are constructed to optimize our performance. a plasma weapon of that size, yes it would have an extremely short range - and we are not talking about every ******* weapon ever to be created by man, this is a gallente weapon = SHORT RANGE HIGH DAMAGE stop ******* trying to compare **** to real life and the future
And stop using obscene language to emphasize your point. If you have an extensive vocabulary, you can do so without the expletives.
Has nothing to do with comparison. I just find it funny that any rifle would have an effective range of 35m. It sounds absurd.
Second, short range could mean anything brain child. Short range doesn't mean 35m only.
So in a futuristic world where immortality is found...they build rifles that can only shoot at 35m, effectively?
Our dropsuits don't affect our performance?
It sounds as nonsensical as you angry tirade. Smoke a bowl... |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1476
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 04:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
-You lost me at AR effective range at 35m
-You lost me at turning the AR (I repeat, an assault rifle) into a CQC weapon
I digress...it just doesn't make much sense all that you saying... |
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
1483
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
I didn't even see that post. But its funny that folks think I'm comparing to real life weaponry. 35m just seems off, that's all I was expressing. Also, he said sci fi facts! LOL, yet EVE is about human beings who traversed a worm hole. Interesting.
Can we please turn our attention to the SCR instead of the Gallente ARs? I would be most appreciated... |
|
|
| |
|