Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1114
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
115
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. This is actually a good idea, and a way to make up for the pitiful battle academy. Plus it would be fun to 1v1 in MLT/STD gear. But what about proficiency skills? |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. This is actually a good idea, and a way to make up for the pitiful battle academy. Plus it would be fun to 1v1 in MLT/STD gear. But what about proficiency skills? What about them? All passive skills have been earned. I won't suggest they be taken away. However I do think matchmaking should be in effect for these matches so they are fairly evenly matched. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1115
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect.
Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. At half payout, it would hurt to loose one but that is your choice. |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 09:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. and my basic forge gun would still eat your tank like a tasty treat. |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
169
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. and my basic forge gun would still eat your tank like a tasty treat. basic packed av grenades would also be quite destructive |
Keri Starlight
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
759
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
We need "Custom games", desperately... most shooters have it.
Friendly private games, no stats, no equipment loss, no rewards, custom rules (clone count, time limit, etc...) |
|
KalOfTheRathi
Nec Tributis
807
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 14:22:00 -
[11] - Quote
Yep, we have been asking for this since Closed Beta. That was before Open Beta and all the releases that have appeared since Uprising from 5 May.
Hasn't happened yet. |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 00:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
KalOfTheRathi wrote:Yep, we have been asking for this since Closed Beta. That was before Open Beta and all the releases that have appeared since Uprising from 5 May. Hasn't happened yet. Well we need to all post on the same thread about it and make a super thread. So if you find or have a better thread please link it so I can post there |
deepfried salad gilliam
Sanguine Knights
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 04:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Keri Starlight wrote:We need "Custom games", desperately... most shooters have it.
Friendly private games, no stats, no equipment loss, no rewards, custom rules (clone count, time limit, etc...) We also have relatively low player count, 4k today at one time, tgats pretty low, if we sepperate player base more the battle entrance time will go up alot
|
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 08:13:00 -
[14] - Quote
deepfried salad gilliam wrote:Keri Starlight wrote:We need "Custom games", desperately... most shooters have it.
Friendly private games, no stats, no equipment loss, no rewards, custom rules (clone count, time limit, etc...) We also have relatively low player count, 4k today at one time, tgats pretty low, if we sepperate player base more the battle entrance time will go up alot People play games for fun. This game wouldn't be so easy to quit if there was a safe haven from proto suits |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 13:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 23:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 01:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
bump |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1146
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 01:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. At half payout, it would hurt to lose one but that is your choice.
You realize that it takes 3+ matches as is to get one of my regular fits, and with this it would only take 2, right? |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1146
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 01:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
Thurak1 wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. and my basic forge gun would still eat your tank like a tasty treat.
I got max vehicle (other than shield, because **** Caldari) skills. Good luck |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 03:35:00 -
[20] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. At half payout, it would hurt to lose one but that is your choice. You realize that it takes 3+ matches as is to get one of my regular fits, and with this it would only take 2, right? As long as you are happy with the idea, good. |
|
Denn Maell
PIanet Express
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 03:47:00 -
[21] - Quote
An MLT Arena sounds awesome. But what about this also? Extend the 'shelter' of Battle Academy a bit further and create a tier system for public matches. This way players have more control over the quality of the opponents they may face?
Battle Academy Matches Hi-sec Public matches Low-sec Public matches Null-Sec Public matches
|
Text Grant
The Generals BC
171
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 05:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Denn Maell wrote:An MLT Arena sounds awesome. But what about this also? Extend the 'shelter' of Battle Academy a bit further and create a tier system for public matches. This way players have more control over the quality of the opponents they may face?
Battle Academy Matches Hi-sec Public matches Low-sec Public matches Null-Sec Public matches
Is that 6 new game modes?? That may be overdoing it. |
Final Rest DDLY
TITAN POWER
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 06:45:00 -
[23] - Quote
great idea :) got my vote.. even after playing for a long time id like to jump in a battle with evenly matched gear and especially the customizable part like being able to 1v1. and also this is a GREAT training ground for noobs and pros alike, and a venue to test players' skills for recruiting purposes
GET THIS IN GAME ASAP PL0XZoR
e:1 downside tho is that it takes people away from other game modes but since it never takes long to find a battle anyway its no big deal imo |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
173
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 21:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
173
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 03:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
173
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 10:25:00 -
[26] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
The Generals BC
174
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 21:30:00 -
[27] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
174
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 01:52:00 -
[28] - Quote
bump |
Stevez WingYip
Operation Wolf Pack
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 08:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish.
Never ban gear people earn and grind to get. That is stupid. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
174
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 10:53:00 -
[30] - Quote
Stevez WingYip wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. Never ban gear people earn and grind to get. That is stupid.
Baal Omniscient wrote:DJINN Jecture wrote:Open world real time matchmaking rather than meta matchmaking for the win. Give me an open world to explore and drones to kill along with players, allow me to ambush someone or capture their home base. Is this game about holding hands and singing kubaya? Or is it about killing and being killed? That's one way to look at it. Here's another. You make the argument that having separate channels for players is hand holding. Ok. Then all you would have to do is go pubstomp in weaker gear in the low meta class if it offends you that you can't stomp on noobs. Unless you're worried that running weaker gear might get you killed by the nublets. Do you really need that proto gear to stomp new players? If you are not worried you'll get stomped by noobs if you run weaker gear, then I don't see your issue. You can play in the noob tier and make crappy rewards after every match. If you are worried you'll get stomped, then your problem isn't my proposal, it's that you need to get good. I'm only saying that people should have the choice to fight withing the weight class they feel they are in gear-wise. People of all skill levels can still join any tier, so there is no hiding from someone who just really wants to stomp noobs, but they will have to do it in the same kind of gear the noobs are in. The fact that you wanna pubstomp noobs in proto gear who don't have the gear to properly defend themselves should be your problem, not theirs.
|
|
Dimitri Rascolovitch
The Immortal Knights
57
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 10:56:00 -
[31] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Text Grant wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:I would go in on that ****. 'Pulls out Maddy, proceeds to **** without fear of PROTO or Adv. AV to insta/seriously fast kill me' Yea, definetly would get in on that **** That would be fine if you had basic turrets, reps, armor, shields, hardeners ect. Yup, and still would kick ass. I would only lose ~1000 eHP on said fit too. my militia and std FG say otherwise |
Arc-08
Horizons' Edge Orion Empire
114
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 11:40:00 -
[32] - Quote
yes, but if matchmaking will be in place, why would the high tier arena guys not be able to use their protos, the reason i would want to have the arena is so i can 1v1 my friends to see who has the better proto suit, since i clearly know we are even with skill at the game.
Also might i suggest 2 different gamemodes for arena, one for vehicles, one for infantry. I might want to have epic dropship war with one of the "best pilots in the game".
anyway just some stuff to think about, if matchmaking is on higher teirs should be able to use anything they have. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
Arc-08 wrote:yes, but if matchmaking will be in place, why would the high tier arena guys not be able to use their protos, the reason i would want to have the arena is so i can 1v1 my friends to see who has the better proto suit, since i clearly know we are even with skill at the game.
Also might i suggest 2 different gamemodes for arena, one for vehicles, one for infantry. I might want to have epic dropship war with one of the "best pilots in the game".
anyway just some stuff to think about, if matchmaking is on higher teirs should be able to use anything they have. What you seem to want is a custom game. A custom game is a different topic altogether and IMO should yield 0 isk and 0 sp |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:43:00 -
[35] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
Bump |
Maximus Tarashara
Red Star. EoN.
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Yes bump! |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:58:00 -
[38] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. This is actually a good idea, and a way to make up for the pitiful battle academy. Plus it would be fun to 1v1 in MLT/STD gear. But what about proficiency skills? What about them? All passive skills have been earned. I won't suggest they be taken away. However I do think matchmaking should be in effect for these matches so they are fairly evenly matched. I'm just sayin, even if I use basic gear I still have proficiency lvl. 5 on my mass drivers. That's slightly more damage than the Freedom Mass driver when I use the basic |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:47:00 -
[39] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. This is actually a good idea, and a way to make up for the pitiful battle academy. Plus it would be fun to 1v1 in MLT/STD gear. But what about proficiency skills? What about them? All passive skills have been earned. I won't suggest they be taken away. However I do think matchmaking should be in effect for these matches so they are fairly evenly matched. I'm just sayin, even if I use basic gear I still have proficiency lvl. 5 on my mass drivers. That's slightly more damage than the Freedom Mass driver when I use the basic The main point is that two medium suits arnt 400 hit points apart. You can't make as much money here so that is the only thing to discourage you from stomping these players. It would still make a better place for people who are being stomped currently though and that is what I'm asking for. Better. |
Zero Roamero
NaphBlade
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Stevez WingYip wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. Never ban gear people earn and grind to get. That is stupid. Baal Omniscient wrote:DJINN Jecture wrote:Open world real time matchmaking rather than meta matchmaking for the win. Give me an open world to explore and drones to kill along with players, allow me to ambush someone or capture their home base. Is this game about holding hands and singing kubaya? Or is it about killing and being killed? That's one way to look at it. Here's another. You make the argument that having separate channels for players is hand holding. Ok. Then all you would have to do is go pubstomp in weaker gear in the low meta class if it offends you that you can't stomp on noobs. Unless you're worried that running weaker gear might get you killed by the nublets. Do you really need that proto gear to stomp new players? If you are not worried you'll get stomped by noobs if you run weaker gear, then I don't see your issue. You can play in the noob tier and make crappy rewards after every match. If you are worried you'll get stomped, then your problem isn't my proposal, it's that you need to get good. I'm only saying that people should have the choice to fight withing the weight class they feel they are in gear-wise. People of all skill levels can still join any tier, so there is no hiding from someone who just really wants to stomp noobs, but they will have to do it in the same kind of gear the noobs are in. The fact that you wanna pubstomp noobs in proto gear who don't have the gear to properly defend themselves should be your problem, not theirs.
I second this. Also............tournaments for newbies and advanced players would be awesome, too. Special rewards and MONEY- lots of money- given as a reward. I must also confess:
I would not be surprised if noob-stompers ended up getting noobed themselves. You reap what you sow, man. If that doesn't make sense to you, consider this: you only know the player's character name. You don't know who the real peson is (unless you met them in real life). You have no idea whether or not the person is new to the game or not unless you check their character's status, which I doubt most people even bother doing.
Hey, you never know. |
|
Text Grant
Death Firm.
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
185
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 01:54:00 -
[42] - Quote
bump |
SickJ
sephiroth clones D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
101
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 03:15:00 -
[43] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Arc-08 wrote:yes, but if matchmaking will be in place, why would the high tier arena guys not be able to use their protos, the reason i would want to have the arena is so i can 1v1 my friends to see who has the better proto suit, since i clearly know we are even with skill at the game.
Also might i suggest 2 different gamemodes for arena, one for vehicles, one for infantry. I might want to have epic dropship war with one of the "best pilots in the game".
anyway just some stuff to think about, if matchmaking is on higher teirs should be able to use anything they have. What you seem to want is a custom game. A custom game is a different topic altogether and IMO should yield 0 isk and 0 sp Or both teams could make a wager... |
hello xxx
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 03:33:00 -
[44] - Quote
SickJ wrote:Text Grant wrote:Arc-08 wrote:yes, but if matchmaking will be in place, why would the high tier arena guys not be able to use their protos, the reason i would want to have the arena is so i can 1v1 my friends to see who has the better proto suit, since i clearly know we are even with skill at the game.
Also might i suggest 2 different gamemodes for arena, one for vehicles, one for infantry. I might want to have epic dropship war with one of the "best pilots in the game".
anyway just some stuff to think about, if matchmaking is on higher teirs should be able to use anything they have. What you seem to want is a custom game. A custom game is a different topic altogether and IMO should yield 0 isk and 0 sp Or both teams could make a wager... Sounds fun. Still has nothing to do with this request. Lol |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
319
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. I love the idea. |
Draco Cerberus
Hell's Gate Inc
403
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:32:00 -
[46] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. I think there needs to be a choice when setting the match on the arena for what the max Meta level of any of a person's gear is from 1 to 5 with 1 allowing meta 1 (level 1 specialized or general suits, links, hives, guns etc) and 5 allowing up to prototype everything. This makes testing skills an option, also make the match setup allow a choice between public, alliance and corporation. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
185
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
Draco Cerberus wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. I think there needs to be a choice when setting the match on the arena for what the max Meta level of any of a person's gear is from 1 to 5 with 1 allowing meta 1 (level 1 specialized or general suits, links, hives, guns etc) and 5 allowing up to prototype everything. This makes testing skills an option, also make the match setup allow a choice between public, alliance and corporation. I would like this and have suggested it in previous threads. However, 4 new game modes, or 12 new game modes if they come with Dom, skirm, and ambush, would seriously split up the player base. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
186
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 22:59:00 -
[48] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 11:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 03:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
Bump |
|
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 07:08:00 -
[51] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 13:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:17:00 -
[53] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 22:37:00 -
[54] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 05:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 08:56:00 -
[56] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:37:00 -
[57] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:13:00 -
[58] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 06:06:00 -
[59] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 12:34:00 -
[60] - Quote
bump |
|
Text Grant
Death Firm.
187
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:47:00 -
[61] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 10:03:00 -
[62] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 21:51:00 -
[63] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 02:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 04:45:00 -
[65] - Quote
Bump |
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division
156
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 07:07:00 -
[66] - Quote
Love it, we could (maybe?) use that as a place to balance std vs std, rather than PC where we balance off of Proto vs Proto and scale it back a % for std. Just my pointless thoughts, but a supporter nonetheless. |
Cyrille Fodeux
DUST University Ivy League
79
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 08:00:00 -
[67] - Quote
Bro, that's already confirmed. There will be a Gladiator mode soonTM. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 12:18:00 -
[68] - Quote
Cyrille Fodeux wrote:Bro, that's already confirmed. There will be a Gladiator mode soonTM. Link? |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 01:23:00 -
[69] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 03:41:00 -
[70] - Quote
Bump |
|
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 08:30:00 -
[71] - Quote
Bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 21:06:00 -
[72] - Quote
Bump |
Flyngpenguin
DUST University Ivy League
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 23:03:00 -
[73] - Quote
I'd like to see Militia vs Militia as well. I've seen a number of people leave the game in frustration after hitting their first few proto squads |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 02:05:00 -
[74] - Quote
Flyngpenguin wrote:I'd like to see Militia vs Militia as well. I've seen a number of people leave the game in frustration after hitting their first few proto squads exactly. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
192
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 05:07:00 -
[75] - Quote
bump |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 13:13:00 -
[76] - Quote
bump |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
543
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:11:00 -
[77] - Quote
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread read number 14 ! |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:16:00 -
[78] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread read number 14 ! Yeah. I was half hoping to get it locked. At least then I'd know they read it. It's so annoying having no clue where they stand on anything |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
543
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:23:00 -
[79] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread read number 14 ! Yeah. I was half hoping to get it locked. At least then I'd know they read it. It's so annoying having no clue where they stand on anything I just reported it telling them I didn't read it and they should just lock it.
You won't get a dev response by asking for one ... I've been around these forums for long enough to know they will make a point of not responding if you specifically ask for them to.
They do their best to read EVERY forum post ... the ones they are likely to skip over are the ones with titles like this one. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:29:00 -
[80] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Text Grant wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread read number 14 ! Yeah. I was half hoping to get it locked. At least then I'd know they read it. It's so annoying having no clue where they stand on anything I just reported it telling them I didn't read it and they should just lock it. You won't get a dev response by asking for one ... I've been around these forums for long enough to know they will make a point of not responding if you specifically ask for them to. They do their best to read EVERY forum post ... the ones they are likely to skip over are the ones with titles like this one. I changed the title after most everyone agreed and still no blue tag. You should read it. Not a bad request. |
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
390
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:40:00 -
[81] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:Atiim wrote:Text Grant wrote:I would like a new game mode. It could be called "arena" (perhaps to imitate fighting for someone's entertainment, or for a corp to test a new players ability more easily if they lack sp) . In this game mode all advanced, prototype, and officer gear is banned to help keep from having a clear winner. A game mode with normal sp gain but half isk rewards. This will give new players a safer place to get better(with less reward), experienced players a place to relax, or practice with new weapons for cheap. If this is limited to one game mode, which I don't think it should be, it should be domination or skirmish. This is actually a good idea, and a way to make up for the pitiful battle academy. Plus it would be fun to 1v1 in MLT/STD gear. But what about proficiency skills? What about them? All passive skills have been earned. I won't suggest they be taken away. However I do think matchmaking should be in effect for these matches so they are fairly evenly matched. I'm just sayin, even if I use basic gear I still have proficiency lvl. 5 on my mass drivers. That's slightly more damage than the Freedom Mass driver when I use the basic The main point is that two medium suits arnt 400 hit points apart. You can't make as much money here so that is the only thing to discourage you from stomping these players. It would still make a better place for people who are being stomped currently though and that is what I'm asking for. Better. I understand, and I fully agree with your idea. It's just that some players (looking at you Nyain San) will insta-abuse this ASAP.
But sadly i've become so good with MDs that even a basic one would make me stomp people. Kinda like Victor from Buso-Renkin. |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 20:46:00 -
[82] - Quote
You won't stomp for long as matchmaking would still be in effect |
Needless Sacermendor
Red Fox Brigade
546
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 23:58:00 -
[83] - Quote
Text Grant wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:Text Grant wrote:Needless Sacermendor wrote:https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=18206&find=unread read number 14 ! Yeah. I was half hoping to get it locked. At least then I'd know they read it. It's so annoying having no clue where they stand on anything I just reported it telling them I didn't read it and they should just lock it. You won't get a dev response by asking for one ... I've been around these forums for long enough to know they will make a point of not responding if you specifically ask for them to. They do their best to read EVERY forum post ... the ones they are likely to skip over are the ones with titles like this one. I changed the title after most everyone agreed and still no blue tag. You should read it. Not a bad request. Well I've read it ... and it's nothing new.
We've been asking for a long time for improvements to matchmaking and had dev responses to threads talking about things like limiting gear in highsec battles and other stuff for new players to cut their teeth like PVE and 'shooting range' to try out weapons etc.
They're pretty busy with the vehicle changes at the moment, but I'm sure NPE is now very high on their to do list since new player retention is almost non existent. After they've got the basics of vehicles done and while they flesh them out and balance them to higher tiers, I don't doubt they'll be working on making matches outside of the acadamy better balanced in some way.
Threads that have content and discussion deserve dev time ... yours just says 'basic gear battle mode' and is followed by a couple of people agreeing and several pages of you just saying 'bump.
Nothing to see here CCP ... End Thread ... Lock ... Good Night ... o7 |
Ecshon Autorez
Solaris Space Marines
99
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 00:16:00 -
[84] - Quote
Unlike some people, I don't bump threads pointlessly, but since your doing it for me, might as well post a link to a thread I think needs more attention.
HOORAY FOR USING PERSISTENT PEOPLE OT ADVERTISE MY THREAD! [New Game Mode] (PVE) Planetary Anomalies
And you do understand that they are intentionally ignoring you because of your behavior, right?
Text Grant wrote:Yeah. I was half hoping to get it locked. At least then I'd know they read it. It's so annoying having no clue where they stand on anything It's also annoying when one person pushes all the other threads back because they sit there bumping. Other threads have been made to ask for something and more people agreed that it was a good idea than in this thread, but they didn't start spamming just because a Dev didn't take time to make a post.
If a Dev says "Ya this looks good." or "We'll work on it." then they've committed to it, if whatever it is doesn't happen people will hold it against them, so they need to be careful about that stuff.
If a Dev says yes to an idea that looks good at first but later turns out to be horrible or something happens and they scrap it then everyone'll complain, saying they lied.
If a Dev, GM, or CPM posts in here, they probably won't even read your posts, but just so that you'll go "Oh, they posted." and stop bumping. |
WASTED MERC
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 15:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
If he stops bumping others him or others will have to start making new threads Then you'll say dont make new threads use search So they use search and find this thread and bump it Then you'll say, don't reserect old threads
??? Use search to find an old thread you shouldn't reserect so you start a new thread only to be told to search for old threads, arnt we going in circles? |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2018
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 20:32:00 -
[86] - Quote
So, I read the whole thread. Your suggestion is nothing new, sir.
The concept of equipment locked matches has been suggested hundreds of times by nearly as many people, in much better worded threads than yours.
Please stop bumping a thread that does not deserve it. Thanks :)
Also, a tidbit from this thread about forum rules
Quote:14. Bumping outside the Corporation Recruitment channel is prohibited. The bumping of posts to alter the order of the thread listing on a forum is prohibited outside the Corporation Recruitment forum channel. The Corporation Recruitment channel also has its own rules. Please review the sticky threads in this forum channel for specific details
|
Text Grant
Death Firm.
194
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 02:39:00 -
[87] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:So, I read the whole thread. Your suggestion is nothing new, sir. The concept of equipment locked matches has been suggested hundreds of times by nearly as many people, in much better worded threads than yours. Please stop bumping a thread that does not deserve it. Thanks :) Also, a tidbit from this thread about forum rulesQuote:14. Bumping outside the Corporation Recruitment channel is prohibited. The bumping of posts to alter the order of the thread listing on a forum is prohibited outside the Corporation Recruitment forum channel. The Corporation Recruitment channel also has its own rules. Please review the sticky threads in this forum channel for specific details Thanks for reading. No more bumps. Although if its requested as much as you say it should be pursued. The reason I posted it this way was to try to make it as easy as possible to implement. Not to be the best post |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
2022
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 03:38:00 -
[88] - Quote
Text Grant wrote: Thanks for reading. No more bumps. Although if its requested as much as you say it should be pursued. The reason I posted it this way was to try to make it as easy as possible to implement. Not to be the best post
The best posts ARE the ones that make it as easy as possible to implement. Discuss idea, suggest possible methods of implementation and their benefit, possible detriments that should be accounted for, etc.
A paragraph saying "We should have a mode that limits tiers" isn't really helpful beyond stating the obvious, and isn't constructive feedback.
On the note of "Tons of people have said they want it" Sure, it's true. Tons of people want PVE, and tons of people want the SP rollover system. Notice we don't have those yet, either :(
CCP's in a position where they have to pick and choose what to add and what to put on the backburner. Hopefully there will be some nice news coming out in the near future though. *wink* |
Text Grant
Death Firm.
194
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 03:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Text Grant wrote: Thanks for reading. No more bumps. Although if its requested as much as you say it should be pursued. The reason I posted it this way was to try to make it as easy as possible to implement. Not to be the best post
The best posts ARE the ones that make it as easy as possible to implement. Discuss idea, suggest possible methods of implementation and their benefit, possible detriments that should be accounted for, etc. A paragraph saying "We should have a mode that limits tiers" isn't really helpful beyond stating the obvious, and isn't constructive feedback. On the note of "Tons of people have said they want it" Sure, it's true. Tons of people want PVE, and tons of people want the SP rollover system. Notice we don't have those yet, either :( CCP's in a position where they have to pick and choose what to add and what to put on the backburner. Hopefully there will be some nice news coming out in the near future though. *wink* I will be sure to read this next time I make a post. And thanks again. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |