|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
366
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 16:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
366
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 16:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
yeah we do lol
respec is their only option they are the one's that removed the closed beta tag ona unfinished game,...they're are aur vehicles and modules and people who posses them...and that means that money needs to be returned as does the sp allocated to all av and vehicles. this game may not have the beta tag but a complete redo of an entire aspect of the game warrants a respec.
i have said nothing of my thoughts on this and i did not notice a 20 page thread on this on the first page of gd so here we are |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
366
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 17:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
G Torq wrote:Mortedeamor wrote:are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Yeah, all the Dust players got together and agreed that we don't need another Respec. i seriously doubted this included people dedicated into av and vehicles that currently play dust..as then they would be 100% unable to play dust they would have millions of sp allocated to skills that no longer exist...they're are modules being taken out that people have specced into..it is not ok to make is so thousands of players have to either start from scratch with dust or not play until they are done |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
368
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 17:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
and that does not include me i may only have half my sp into vehicle but losing 13 million sp would seriously **** anyone off ...they cannot do that. i have 26 million sp in dust....i should not have to lose half my versatility because ccp cant refund what they are reworking. what are they gunna do randomly add peoples old vehicle sp to the new skill tree non optional? cause thats gunna go over well...no they need to give them back their sp and let them choose again where to allocate it.
this game does not look like it will survive ps4 as is without ccp ruining thousands of characters |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
371
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
CharCharOdell wrote:Logibro said it is going to happen with vehicle skills (refund; not respec), but he does not know if it will be submitting a ticket, a server-wide blanket refund of everything in vehicle command, turrets, and vehicle upgrades, etc....yeah, itll happen but we dont know how. suck on that, infantry. thank you charlotte you are very helpfull as always ..cant ask a ******* question on these forums without some troll picking it up nowadays |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
371
|
Posted - 2013.10.06 19:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote:Don't like idea of respec's but not going to burn logibro at the stake if it happens. no one would burn logi bro at the stake he is the most usefull member of ccp when it comes to dust 514 |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
376
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 09:50:00 -
[7] - Quote
True Adamance wrote:Mortedeamor wrote:are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Why would AV need a respec, its been broken for a long while... hell im not complaining, I came to the sudden realisation that dont play dust any more for the game play, but insted for the awesome people i have met in this game. i dont really i care more about the sp into tanks and lavs..but they are redoing the av..an personally if i had an option i would remove my character from vehicles and av altogether and be infantry 24/7 dust is not a vehicle game |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
376
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 09:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:Mortedeamor wrote:G Torq wrote:Mortedeamor wrote:are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) Yeah, all the Dust players got together and agreed that we don't need another Respec. i seriously doubted this included people dedicated into av and vehicles that currently play dust..as then they would be 100% unable to play dust they would have millions of sp allocated to skills that no longer exist...they're are modules being taken out that people have specced into..it is not ok to make is so thousands of players have to either start from scratch with dust or not play until they are done I think G Tora was intentionally being facetious. At least I want to believe it was humorous sarcasm and not an idiot trolling. THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:there was about 30 forum trolls that spammed every respec thread with "NO MOAR RESPECS DERP" whereas every other person on dust wants one and DESERVES one. but who cares? games dead, CCP listened to the retards for too long. the game isnt bringing in **** for revenue anymore and a few hundred of the 4000 active playerbase stop logging on every month. that number increasing substantially everytime a big title drops So true. For Eve Online they've been slowly pushing options for PvP on most ships. When they changes to Marauders were announced some PvPers went @pesh!t. All under the assumption that properly fitted cheap Tech 1 ships should be able to get easy kills on one billion isk Tech 2 ships. The funny part is it worked. Marauders will continue being a ship whose cost is mostly based on manufacturing and little to do with value. Don't get me wrong I'm glad the Devs are sort of listening. They just need to work on their critical thinking skills. Maybe bring in the kids to work. Those little munchkins are great for pointing out the obvious crap we adults miss. hey i hear planet side 2 is amaaaazing though and yeah im sure is just being facetious but i am not really humorous when it comes to dust 514 vehicles |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
381
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 10:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
low genius wrote:Mortedeamor wrote:are they confirmed? (in regards to vehicles and av) no. but any skill tree that's changed is normally refunded. have they said for certain which skills are going to change? because those skills are the one's you might get back. you would THINK THAT you know i mean it is ccp though and ive been playing for almost 2 years so i have to ******* ask..i mean the years have taught me to be sure. |
|
|
|