voted

no one thinks it's fine XD it's either OP or UP not fine.

done, i wouldnt mind the cost so much if i had the ability to fit more extenders/plates/whatever. the current system is rather crippled compared to what we used to be able to fit in chromosome.

Unfortunately the poll is locked and I cant edit it. I was going to put a buff dropships + scout LAV's one but I figured that they'll be handled when vehicles are rebalanced.

So, what do you want changed?

I am newer to the game. Have vehicles ever been common place? As in were they ever very affordable? What's wrong with vehicles being everywhere. Also, you could make them cost a lot less to balance their continual destruction?

I feel that having 5 semi destructible tanks and or dropships all over the map would be more strategic and fun than one or two impossible to down vehicles costing millions.

Well, being in an a very formidable tank/dropship in a public match might be fun for the crew, it does nothing for overall satisfaction of the general player base.

anyone surprised that only 2 people voted for the proto tanks?

seems like everyone is starting to see that the price and the skills are more important than 2 old hulls that probably wont be as good as they once were

unfortunately CCP wont bother looking at this...





of course you don't, because then you would actually have to use teamwork to take us out and we all know how much you hate teamwork

lol, I hate having gunners in my tank because they do not give effort to the team, since when is AFKing in a small turret farming points giving to the team?

at least I actually do **** when im in a tank unlike your friends

since open beta, the only purpose we have on the field, is enemy suppression and point defense.

anyone surprised that only 2 people voted for the proto tanks?

seems like everyone is starting to see that the price and the skills are more important than 2 old hulls that probably wont be as good as they once were

unfortunately CCP wont bother looking at this...

@ Void

Points of tanks:
-infantry Supression
-Point Defense
-Vehicle Destruction
-Asset destruction

This is what tanks are supposed to do.

BUT YOU, YEAH SPECIALLY YOU, want a single tanker to be able to blaze through the battlefield , inmune, with only 1 tank operator and no support, to be able to solo a game.Hell if it was for you tanks would even hack null cannons.

This is why i oppose you.

you completely miss the point of my entire stance, I want survivability.. its not my fault you cant find 1 or 2 other people with enough brains to help you take down a single tanker who know what hes doing. which is why you want us weaker so you don't have to put in any effort to take us down... at least at the moment you need minimal effort to do so.

if my idea of balance was to come true, people with specific skills would make a tank un-killable literally and solo tankers like myself would have survivability, that way its not eliminating the point of actually skilling into tanks yet the most help you have from friends, the longer you live.

we are required to have friends to help us live longer like you want, yet we are not forced to do so just to use the vehicle, everyone wins.

Well you OBVIOUSLY miss the point of MY stance.
1-I dont want tanks weaker, i want them stronger.
2-Im against BUFFING TANKS AND NERFING av because i feel doing both would break the BALANCE.
3-I dont want tanks removed from the game. 2 of my 4 characters are Tankers.
4-'' its not my fault you cant find 1 or 2 other people with enough brains to help you take down a single tanker''No its not your fault. But i still disagree tanks can freeley rampage through pub matches.
5''which is why you want us weaker so you don't have to put in any effort to take us down'' I never said i wanted tanks to be weaker. Check the forums again. im just against AV nerf and when i see a Tanker saying how UP tanks are THEN i come out with stories,of tankers surviving under Heavy AV fire.
6-''people with specific skills would make a tank un-killable literally ''THIS IS WHAT YOU WANT?
You talk about balance and then say this?
I just. I cant reason with you....

''funny thing about the null hacking thing, that would be awesome, because then tankers could hack the objectives and NOT worry about your ******** friends stealing our vehicles.'' I knew it..... LOL

the biggest evidence I have against you is that you wanted the pilot seat separated the gunner seat, that is one of the worst ideas anyone has ever had in this game.

however, I disagree that nerfing av will break the balance, because basically there is no balance, there hasn't been any balance since uprising began.

no one thinks it's fine XD it's either OP or UP not fine.

at least with my idea, we actually have a reason to WANT others in our tanks..

If with the adjustment, if they stay the same or very close efficiency, and the AV gets nerfed, would you be fine with that?

YES



But people cant say they want AV nerfed and then request PROTO TANKS.
And this is what they want. Look at Void. He publicly admits he wants tanks to be unkillable.
And this is the mind, of 90% of the tankers here in the forums.

YES



But people cant say they want AV nerfed and then request PROTO TANKS.
And this is what they want. Look at Void. He publicly admits he wants tanks to be unkillable.
And this is the mind, of 90% of the tankers here in the forums.

I am newer to the game. Have vehicles ever been common place? As in were they ever very affordable? What's wrong with vehicles being everywhere. Also, you could make them cost a lot less to balance their continual destruction?

I feel that having 5 semi destructible tanks and or dropships all over the map would be more strategic and fun than one or two impossible to down vehicles costing millions.

Well, being in an a very formidable tank/dropship in a public match might be fun for the crew, it does nothing for overall satisfaction of the general player base.

0H 1 th1nk 1t c0\_/1]} 133 \/\/0R$3