|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1702
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 22:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:65k for the Omega booster? That's a ******* 33% increase from the previously released ones.
Are you on crack?
That's the greediest ******* **** I've seen since War Z's server fiasco. (now called Zombie Survival Stories or some stupid ****).
Don't give me that supply and demand bullshit either. Purposely limiting items to raise the demand doesn't justify increasing the damn price by 33%. That's shady as fuckin hell.
How hilarious it is, that after all the bullshit I've waded through on the development team, and not minding the length of time it takes to create a decent game, It's the marketing team that makes me say **** you and your game.
See you on the PS4 if you ever ******* make it there with you greedy assholes.
Oh look, another poor person with an entitlement complex. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1704
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 01:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:
Did you really just say that?
Must be another fox news loving american.
So let me put this a way that your Reagan worshipping mind might understand.
Remember the dis-proven Laffer curve? The one where if you tax at a higher rate you get less taxes? Well supply and demand works kinda the same way. This means that by pricing these items so high, CCP has actually decreased the amount of profit they could make from these items. (i know incredibly simplified but consider the audience.)
If priced at fanfair pricing, people may have bought enough of these boosters for a year, spending hundreds each. Instead they decided to overcharge for them and most have turned away.
Dear shoeless hippy,
How about you let capitalism work. If they arent selling well, CCP can do something about it on their own.
|
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1706
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 10:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Crimson Cerberes wrote:Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Crimson Cerberes wrote:
Did you really just say that?
Must be another fox news loving american.
So let me put this a way that your Reagan worshipping mind might understand.
Remember the dis-proven Laffer curve? The one where if you tax at a higher rate you get less taxes? Well supply and demand works kinda the same way. This means that by pricing these items so high, CCP has actually decreased the amount of profit they could make from these items. (i know incredibly simplified but consider the audience.)
If priced at fanfair pricing, people may have bought enough of these boosters for a year, spending hundreds each. Instead they decided to overcharge for them and most have turned away.
Dear shoeless hippy, How about you let capitalism work. If they arent selling well, CCP can do something about it on their own. Dear Mr. Republican (I can't think of a worse insult tbh), I know your educational system is horrible, and you live in a neopotism based economy, so I forgive your cro-magnon views on the poor (btw jesus loved the poor and hated the rich). This is reality though, we are looking to engage in a MUTUALLY beneficial relationship with CCP as consumers. While I have no problem walking away from the omega boosters, I do have a problem with mismanagement in the marketing division of a game company I greatly enjoy. They are throwing away GOBS of money, and that type of descision making process does not inspire confidence in the future of this game I enjoy. Oh and to the people complaining about baying more in Euros, be glad we don't have many Tea Partiers or american republican/christians. I know I will gladly pay more to keep that type of society out.
I never claimed I was a republican.
I just don't like people who reject common sense.
The party you choose to follow does not dictate the use of your brain, although in your case it appears that it might. |
Himiko Kuronaga
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
1706
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 11:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:I get that they cost more than twice as much as a normal booster, and that's honestly fine.
But you know what isn't fine? The cost of passive booster and active boosters to begin with. (I won't even get started on the bonuses they give)
The idea that someone's paying roughly 30$ a month for a dream that hasn't been realized. Twice the 'industry standard' for a subscription fee, for a game that's horribly incomplete and riddled with problems. It's straight up offensive. Then add in omega boosters that hike that up to $50+ a month? Talk about a kick in the balls.
But you know what's even more sad than the perception within CCP that this is fine to do?
The fact that people are still going to buy the **** out of it, because they want to 'stay competitive' and because it gives a definite advantage to the people who have it. It's the very nature of a pvp gamer's mentality. Gravitate towards the best items, take any advantage you can get... even if you have to pay for it.
I don't care how CCP justifies this. Boosters have always been Pay to Win. Even if their own definition of pay2win doesn't see it that way... Their customers do.
Now this, on the other hand, is a post I can actually respect as it removes all sense of automatic entitlement and actually attempts to assess the worth of the product versus the competition on the market.
If you were to ask me, I would say that you are perhaps looking at things the wrong way. Ideally the standard, "boosted" service should meet roughly at where a subscription for a regular game would lie -- $15.00 US for example. If you pay the value raw and simply buy month-long boosters, it averages closer to 17$ for passive and active boosters (assuming you are being smart and buying veteran packs instead of raw aurum). It gets obviously gets crazier when you start going into Omega's.
As pointed out, however, you can virtually double the effectiveness of whatever aurum is set aside for the active boosters by strategically using them on 7 day boosters during Sunday hours -- effectively paying for one week of booster, but getting the SP of two. This actually reduces the overall cost of regular boosters to somewhere closer to the 10$ range per month which is typically less than a subscription based game. The passive booster remains the largest money sink, as there is no way to manipulate the performance of that. It is either on, or it's off.
The Omega sets obviously remain pricier than a regular subscription game, but again -- are cheaper if used strategically. I find it very difficult to recommend a passive omega booster though. Ideally, CCP would have to lower the price of the passive to make it more attractive but would have to keep the active around the same due to the strategic usage of it already making its value better than intended. |
|
|
|