|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jakar Umbra
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
267
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 13:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
I find it depends on the subject. Though, of course, many tactics are a staple. The brutish methods of striking the subject I have found to be particularly ineffective as it eventually brings about a certain level of familiarity. Using a variety of tools and implements one can create a very potent level of discomfort for the subject. This coupled with the subtle yet invasive methods of the Caldari allow for an effective method of torture that leads to a very successful results.
It also helps to have someone who does not agree with your method of torture, who may actually grow concerned for the subject. In this manner the subject may find himself with an ally. One who he may confide in to help him get out of the pain.
I also keep in mind one rule that many forget. One must always keep the torture/interrogation psychological. Physical only gets you so far.
I find for the extreme cases one must bring the situation a little closer to home for the subject. I am not fond of harming civilians who are not directly involved, in fact I often make it a rule not to, but sometimes it's unavoidable when it's an important matter. |
Jakar Umbra
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
267
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 13:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:I prefer the quick and honest methods of the Matar.
My personal favorites include: -Shooting the knee caps and elbows -Stabbing appendages to walls -Sack or bag over the head -Glass and rocks in the mouth while getting punched -Dangling from a high place -Choking -Getting hit with hot pieces of metal -Saying I'm going to slice open their throat, though, give them a beard trim instead. This is more of a joke, though surprisingly effective -Drowning and choking some one in less than a foot of water -Dislocating both arms by applying pressure to the back -And of course, exposed electric cables to the back
Call me old fashion, but I prefer making use of my environment, rather than relying on torture chambers.
But I'm curious, what do you sickos like to do to get your info in this Cluster we call EVE? I assume that these methods are methods applied impromtu in the field. |
Jakar Umbra
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
267
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 21:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Denak Kalamari wrote:A lot of people, especially the OP, seem to be confusing interrogation with torture. Interrogation and torture are closely related for me. I do follow certain, I suppose you could call them, rules, however most subjects are unwilling to simply give up secrets and information which is where these methods come into play. It's simple really, you put a civilian in a sterile room and intimidate them into giving up a secret sure, but you put someone trained to keep secrets into a room, it's going to take a bit more than a simple question.
The best way to put it is that I'm the specialist, while whoever my partner is at the time is the person who gets the information. After all, my partner is the one that can make it stop. |
Jakar Umbra
Militaires-Sans-Frontieres
267
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 21:35:00 -
[4] - Quote
Denak Kalamari wrote:True Adamance wrote:Torture is but a means of extracting information. I simply share how I have been taught to conduct myself against the religious extremists the Amarrian Templars encounter.
As you can imagine there is often no way that an extremist would divulge any information, most times choosing death over capture, extraction of the information from the mind without destroying the body is the rule I have been taught. That's a valid point, but as people have already stated earlier in this thread, torture seldom works as means to extract valid information from subjects. From what I have read in this thread at least some use torturous methods just to sate their own needs and twisted desires. I'm not going to even indulge in the ethical problems of this kind of interrogation. As for myself, I was trained to withstand interrogation, physical and psychological. I was never taught how to conduct interrogations myself. I'm only usually wanted when a subject proves difficult to crack, so the amount of times I've had to interrogate are lower than the amount of subjects of witnessed interrogated. It's a curious thing really.
As for Adamance's statement. I operate on the philosophy that the body and mind are connected. One can manipulate one through the other in both directions through the use of both painful and invasive methods. |
|
|
|