Disruption game play for adhoc groups of players to participate more in the meta game

From the squad finder dev blog:

Is it just me or does this sound distinctly like there's going to be something to do that other players can 'disrupt'; perhaps something like PVE! please, please, please soon[tm] CCP

From the squad finder dev blog:

Is it just me or does this sound distinctly like there's going to be something to do that other players can 'disrupt'; perhaps something like PVE! please, please, please soon[tm] CCP

We're all so desperate for PVE...
It's kind of sad.

Not me, Im perfectly fine blasting people. Different game modes to blast people would be nice, though, and beat pve for me. I just hope that the disruption gameplay has somethimg to do with that, like being able to sabotage a PC district or something.

Taken out of context it can mean anything. If I say I like cheese, out of context, you are missing the part where I only like cheese on the hamburger.

In context, disruption by a player joining a squad joining a match would be someone who is disrupting that squads advitivies in the match - public, FW, or PC.

Don't waste your time speculating the coming of PVE (any time before 2016), you are going to leave yourself disappointed and depressed; Dont believe me? Ask the vets who have been here longer than I have. They have been promised a lot more than PVE, and get almost nothing in return.

If there's space and the squad isn't locked, you can already join someones squad. How can you then "disrupt" them and how does that come into anything meta?

To me it seems you can only disrupt others if they're doing something that doesn't already involve you. With all current game modes everyone is engaged with the enemy team in one way or another - there's nothing to do to disrupt that isn't already the main point of the game.

Thus, the only conclusion must be that disruption play implies new game modes that offer activities to be "disrupted".

"Disruption" equals things like AWOX, corp theft, selling intel to the enemy, etc. Things that would "disurpt" a corp's operations either in match or out of match.

Sounds more like awoxing, especially with the new TCO roles. A TCO invites his squad into a PC battle against his real corp, they turn on the blues, to make reds job easier!

So there's really not going to be a difference since those that play in squads usually are in one and solo players play solo. Unless squads could combine together

I imagine this will happen but prehaps as an ewar kinda thing, but yeah you'll be able to stack squads!

Sounds more like awoxing, especially with the new TCO roles. A TCO invites his squad into a PC battle against his real corp, they turn on the blues, to make reds job easier!

I don't understand. This implies a TCO role was given to an untrustworthy player. I really don't think this is the kind of thing that can be classed as disruptive play and would hardly be something new that TTG would list as something they're working on.

It happens. Trust me it can happen.

Entire billion ISK and thousand player corps and alliances can and are torn down by one person simply saying

"I wonder if I can"

"**** this"

"Oh he's paying X amount more"

Trust is not a word thrown around EVE lightly, and sooner of later Dust as well.