|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:34:00 -
[1] - Quote
So are we to refer to tankers as pilots now? Cause NO. Pilots fly. Tankers drive. Even in space. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:So are we to refer to tankers as pilots now? Cause NO. Pilots fly. Tankers drive. Even in space. What do you mean now? they always have. Where you been bro?
Please read title broski. to non-pilots lol. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:So are we to refer to tankers as pilots now? Cause NO. Pilots fly. Tankers drive. Even in space. The term "Pilot", on this forum, actually refers to the yet-to-be-released Pilot suit, which will provide bonuses to vehicles.
Ohh. I get it. When I refer to an awesome game it will actually refer to the yet-to-be-released Dust514. Gotcha.
Also not new to the forums and pilot still refers to anyone who flies atm. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:So are we to refer to tankers as pilots now? Cause NO. Pilots fly. Tankers drive. Even in space. You're arguing semantics. That's not what this thread is about. Start a thread about proper grammar if you want to argue about that. We consider ourselves pilots because sometime we're getting the pilot suit to improve our vehicles.
Sorry for arguing semantics. I'm sorry. Hope you see there is nothing wrong with calling yourselves tankers though. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 16:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Judge Rhadamanthus wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:So are we to refer to tankers as pilots now? Cause NO. Pilots fly. Tankers drive. Even in space. What do you mean now? they always have. Where you been bro? Please read title broski. to non-pilots lol. Did you have coffee today?
That's one drug I don't touch. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:24:00 -
[6] - Quote
It seems the "tankers" want to go back to the supertanker days during closed beta. Sorry tanks have always been vulnerable to a single person with a RPG. LIke always. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:It seems the "tankers" want to go back to the supertanker days during closed beta. Sorry tanks have always been vulnerable to a single person with a RPG. LIke always. If they were that vulnerable, we wouldn't be using them in the Middle East. Why are you so afraid of tanks? You're given incredibly effective and easy to use tools to take care of them, yet you still complain and seem scared. Why are you scared?
You do realize we have "Up armored" our tanks right? Guess not.
P.S. Sooo not fraid. Proto nades and swarms .
So do you want to go back to the supertanker days? Seems so. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:44:00 -
[8] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:JL3Eleven wrote:It seems the "tankers" want to go back to the supertanker days during closed beta. Sorry tanks have always been vulnerable to a single person with a RPG. LIke always. If they were that vulnerable, we wouldn't be using them in the Middle East. Why are you so afraid of tanks? You're given incredibly effective and easy to use tools to take care of them, yet you still complain and seem scared. Why are you scared? You do realize we have "Up armored" our tanks right? Guess not. P.S. Sooo not fraid. Proto nades and swarms . So do you want to go back to the supertanker days? Seems so. Please, assume I'm an idiot and know nothing about American firepower. The same concept carries through to Dust. PRO crutches are what they are. I don't remember "supertanker" days.
Okkk. Sooo. The reason we are having this discussion right now is because in the Beta at some points tanks were almost invincible and caused many QQ's. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote: So we're still at this point, because even after so many consecutive nerfs to tanks, and so many parallel buffs to AV, infantry still think tanks are overpowered? From a point over a year ago, to now? All of that considered, tanks are still overpowered?
Got it
Don't hate the player hate the game. I'm just telling you like it is. Don't think it's fair? lol ask the dropship pilots. They suffered the same thing. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 17:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Hey everyone it's me Surt Gods End. A FPS Player. (That's right, I don't touch that mmo rubbish. Nor did I migrate from DCUO nor eve)
Just wanted to add to OP list of facts.
FACT 1- Takes one cool dude in RL to take out tank.
FACT 2- Takes one cool dude in a FPS video game to take out tank.
FACT 3- Dust is a lobby FPS.
FACT 4- HAV plays SUPPORT ROLES IN MOST FPS GAMES.
FACT 5- If the price for tanks and DS are lowered, less QQ will be had from pilots. and more HAV and DS will be seen on the field.
FACT 6- Tankers will die more with FACT 5. But lowered price should negate that. What's that? you don't think you should die more than 2 a match? Well... Harden The **** Up.
|
|
|
|
|