|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
If you want that, then all your equipment gets carried in a pack and someone else has to take it out for it to be used.
This is kinda what pilots are getting at. Plus, we are in pods that allow us to control the turret and drive at the same time, as it's a modified version of the pods in Capsuleer ships (no ejection sadly). |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
774
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 01:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Funny how all the tankers say they work as part of their team but any suggestions making their vehicle most effective with team work get shot down isnt it Anyway I bet you a dollar they would lock everyone out and just jump around every seat if your suggestions were ever implemented
1: The only way for us to survive (blasters mostly) is to have the scrubs back us up, and in return, we give you little buggers a lot of covering fire. Teamwork.
2: We shoot it down because half of the time, you ******* would make us useless.
3: Most pilots who main tanking would just quit if this were to happen, and everyone else would just not use them. It's bad enough that a less experienced person would use the gun, but that's another player taken off the board to make a vehicle actually useful. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
779
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Sgt Buttscratch wrote:So let me get this straight... Build a tank for 800k-3kk, then drive it and operate a turret with only 180 degree's POV, then allow some absolute scrub to get all the fun using the main turret that costs anyhere from 100k-1kk...NO [font size=******* HUGE]NO[/font]
Thats as bad as the idea tank pilots should only get to drive, all turrets have additional gunners. Absurd. Tanker skills in ISK's in, everyone else reaps benefit, tank owner has to restock when fail gunners get ya killed.
How about this: Tank owner(the guy who skilled in purchased and built tank) drives the tank with full operation of top turret, small turrets are not only optional but are lockable to no-one/team/squad. my idea is a complete revamp of tanks so nothing that we have currently has any relevance to it, isk price, who owns it and what seat they get, what skills they have spent all their sp on. it has no relevance at this moment in time. its a basic idea so the argument i bought it and skilled into it so its all mine is irrelevent. its not just yours in my idea. its a squad asset. the owner could be the top gunner if that was his/ her prefered position although its unlikely but its still a choice. as for who buys it. you, corp,squad,team, a friend, borrow or steal it. as for sp well you no longer need 20-30 mil sp to be any good. you only need sp for the seat you prefer to take.
pilot calls in the vehicles, so point is void. It's not going to happen. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
779
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:The Attorney General wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:
my idea is a complete revamp of tanks so nothing that we have currently has any relevance to it, isk price, who owns it and what seat they get, what skills they have spent all their sp on. it has no relevance at this moment in time. its a basic idea so the argument i bought it and skilled into it so its all mine is irrelevent. its not just yours in my idea. its a squad asset.
the owner could be the top gunner if that was his/ her prefered position although its unlikely but its still a choice. as for who buys it. you, corp,squad,team, a friend, borrow or steal it.
as for sp well you no longer need 20-30 mil sp to be any good. you only need sp for the seat you prefer to take.
Someone needs to skill into the chassis. Someone needs to skill into the main turret. If the person who skills into the chassis is the driver, he would never skill into turrets that he won't be using. If the person who skills into the chassis also has to skill into the turret, he is investing SP for someone else to use something, which is ridiculous. And yes, whomever is calling it in has to skill into the whole vehicle, which he can't use, because that is how the fitting system works. Your idea is bad, but instead of giving it up you are going to try and keep acting like it is a good idea. Also, you don't need 20 million SP to be good in tanks. You cna make very servicable fits for less than 6, can roll PC if you choose your skills wisely at 7, and be fit maxxed for one type of tank at around 8.5-9.5. So I'll support this type of BS as long as: Heavies need a Logi to spawn in their HMG for them. Only Logis can equip nanohives. All infantry must get their grenades from a nanaohive, as they spawn with zero. All infantry spawn with half of their current ammo, to promote teamwork. All infantry are limited by the meta level of what their squad leader spawns in. He goes MLT, you do to. Because if you want to promote teamwork, lets do it with infantry as well. Because as long as an Assault troop with a Duvolle and AV nades is an omni threat, then we can't be trying to force teamwork on other parts of the game. All of this is completely irrelevant because tanking is already highly team oriented if you want to survive. You can't ignore the infantry with you, because if they pull back and you decide to hang out and try and get more kills, you are getting blown up pretty fast. did i say someone had to skill into the chassis, did i say someone had to skill into the turrets, i did say they are only responsible for their own space in the tank. specialise or jack of all trades it thats upto the individual crew member. calling in the vehicle. why would anyone have to be skilled into it. on the current system they would have too but this is not in the current system its an idea and things could be changed so it could be implemented. like i said use it as a squad asset. orbitals are squad assets so they could easy be called in via a system like that. also who is to say ccp couldn't come up with an option to fit your own part of the tank in vehicle fittings so just a chassis or just a turret with their own pq/cpu etc. the chassis pilot could call in the vehicle and it then is asked by the system which gunner he is using. he selects the main gunner and the main gunner gets a message to accept. once accepted the vehicle comes in with the completed vehicle with one persons chassis and the others turret
So what you're now saying is that you don't have to skill into anything anymore. LOL. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
780
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:19:00 -
[5] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Sgt Buttscratch wrote:So let me get this straight... Build a tank for 800k-3kk, then drive it and operate a turret with only 180 degree's POV, then allow some absolute scrub to get all the fun using the main turret that costs anyhere from 100k-1kk...NO [font size=******* HUGE]NO[/font]
Thats as bad as the idea tank pilots should only get to drive, all turrets have additional gunners. Absurd. Tanker skills in ISK's in, everyone else reaps benefit, tank owner has to restock when fail gunners get ya killed.
How about this: Tank owner(the guy who skilled in purchased and built tank) drives the tank with full operation of top turret, small turrets are not only optional but are lockable to no-one/team/squad. Perhaps don't bring tank in pubs then. Look something else for solo pwn suit.
So, let me get this straight:
1: public matches are for only infantry
2: pilots are only allowed to use their vehicles when it's an important match, or when the other side has a bunch of PROTO AV ready
3: Even though pilots skilled into vehicles most of the way, they should use gimped fits in pubs.
Yea, no.
|
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
780
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Funny how all the tankers say they work as part of their team but any suggestions making their vehicle most effective with team work get shot down isnt it Anyway I bet you a dollar they would lock everyone out and just jump around every seat if your suggestions were ever implemented 1: The only way for us to survive (blasters mostly) is to have the scrubs back us up, and in return, we give you little buggers a lot of covering fire. Teamwork. 2: We shoot it down because half of the time, you ******* would make us useless. 3: Most pilots who main tanking would just quit if this were to happen, and everyone else would just not use them. It's bad enough that a less experienced person would use the gun, but that's another player taken off the board to make a vehicle actually useful. 1. Honestly I would call that team work if your attitude is the way it is now, generally theres at least a shred of mutual respect between teammates 2. How do you know that? Are you using just any random joe schmoe to prove your point or are you using experience with squaddies you know as your example 3. To me giving up one pair of boots on the ground so a tank can have both greater mobility and more accurate firepower on the move seems like a fair trade off
1: I've been doing that, so yea, go teamwork I guess.
2: Because most random ******* (99%) just shoot at the MCC or some other random BS, then hop out and run away when I take like 10% damage. You honestly think that they would somehow change? The only time I get good people is when
A: It's another pilot
B: It's a good squad/corp/alliance mate who I know that they know how to use the turrets properly, and are usually pilots
Plus, if they don't hop out, when the turrets would be ineffective, they just sit there. Lastly, when I need to recall, they just don't get out. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
780
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:sixteensixty4 wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:problem is tanks should have always been squad assets from the get go. biggest mistake CCP made was letting any tom,**** and harry with delusions of grandeur buy and use them. this only made everyone who used them feel they should be able to kill everything solo because they spent all the sp and isk on them.
until tankers get it out of their heads that a tank is for soloing then nothing ccp does is going to fix tanks and your only hurting your own profession by not accepting suggestions even offering constructive criticism on the bad suggestions. it all adds to the bigger picture. simply asking for hp buffs or av nerfs is not going to fix nothing because the core of the tank role is so messed up to start with If a fecking titan in eve uses all his own weapons and modules, then im pretty fecking sure my piddily little tank can also The support for a tank, is either, good gunners in the aux turrets, or YOU the ******* infantry, preferably both and regarding offering constructive criticism on your idea, maybe you would have got some, if you had just thought about it, come on, your idea is fecking stupid for reasons already mentioned you basicly just sh!t on anyone that doesnt role in a corp, or as i said already, maybe you wont have friends online when you are and as my post above this, you cant trust random blues to main the turrets when 90% of them just want troll you you are the perfect example of why tanks will never be fixed. me,me,me,me,me. and hostility towards any change that is not a buff a pod pilot is nothing like a dust merc. a pod pilot is wired directly into his craft. a merc just drives it with his arms and legs. absolutely no comparison there. also you have it wrong. the tank is there to support the troops on the ground who actually capture stuff to win the fight. not the other way round. another delusion of the tank driver you gave no reasons until now why it was bad, oh yes you did, what was it, i cant solo tank with your idea. more me,me,me as for people not being online to man your vehicle. well congratulations you found a flaw and gave constructive criticism on it. gold star to this guy. we are making progress. How do you know the pilot isn't directly wired into the tank? There's no view of the cockpit so how can you speak with any certainty?
Actually, we do sit in pods. They're not as strong as the ones in cap' ships (reason why we don't control all the turrets), but it's good enough to take the driver's seat, the modules, and one turret. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
782
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Void Echo wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:[tanks for WP
how about ISK, you still cant buy anything with WP, all they are good for are orbital strikes. but still your post is flawed in so many ways... and to top that you even admitted that you want tanks removed from the game (you may have not meant it (no you meant it)), and now your one of the biggest enemies we face as we are trying to achieve balance. after I make this post, this thread will probably be locked for trolling or il just stop posting on this nonsense and let you non-tankers decide the fate of tankers for the 92nd time. you buy an orbital with wp so why not a squad based tank if you have the squad members to use it. you state my suggestion is flawed in many ways but none of you have stated why, plenty of no's and zero reasons why. no i dont want tanks removed but if tank users are unwilling to compromise then they have no purpose in dust you are asking that tank users have the only say on balance to tanks when any buff to tanks is a nerf to all infantry to which there are more of us than you. as for trolling. i made a legitimate suggestion. it is you few unwilling to take any suggestions or work on them to come up with a better idea who are trolling. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find=unread
1: You don't buy OB's with wp's; they still cost ISK.
2: Read further posts for several reasons.
3: We give you ungrateful ******* covering fire, and distract 1-3 guys for you.
4: Wait, when did it become more pilots vs. more infantry?
5: Although it is a legit proposal, doesn't mean it was a good one. There's other ways of making us work better with you; gimping us isn't it. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
788
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:Support.
Unfortunately, I knew how the community would react to this, since I suggested it several times in the past. No matter how much sense it makes, they think that a high price tag justifies being able to go solo.
It doesn't. Price = potential effectiveness; not base effectiveness. It doesn't make sense at all.
I'm not sure why he thinks that since it's a high price tag, it should be split up. That's like saying Heavies Would cost 500k, but needs to get ammo from logi's at the start, and can't move. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
788
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 06:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:Well perhaps solo operated tanks could be smaller ones, like scout tanks?
And multi operated be the toughest heavy tanks?
It's over. Not going to happen. No. |
|
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
790
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 07:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
Delta 749 wrote:Funny how all the tankers say they work as part of their team but any suggestions making their vehicle most effective with team work get shot down isnt it Anyway I bet you a dollar they would lock everyone out and just jump around every seat if your suggestions were ever implemented
Funny how none of the infantry scrubs respond to any of the ideas the pilots put up, or call them stupid, and when we ask them why, they just keep calling it stupid. And as I have, and all the other pilots here has said, this makes us literally dependent on getting someone to hop in, and pray to god that they are not ******* stupid, or always have a squad mate. You really think that's okay? |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
790
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 07:07:00 -
[12] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:Delta 749 wrote:Funny how all the tankers say they work as part of their team but any suggestions making their vehicle most effective with team work get shot down isnt it Anyway I bet you a dollar they would lock everyone out and just jump around every seat if your suggestions were ever implemented Funny how none of the infantry scrubs respond to any of the ideas the pilots put up, or call them stupid, and when we ask them why, they just keep calling it stupid. And as I have, and all the other pilots here has said, this makes us literally dependent on getting someone to hop in, and pray to god that they are not ******* stupid, or always have a squad mate. You really think that's okay? Of course he thinks it's okay, because it's not going to directly affect him.
Well, that's a goddamn shame then |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
798
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 23:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:misconceptions of most tank drivers
"we provide cover"
no you don't, we jump inside to hide and you moan, we hide down the side and you drive away because you think we are going to jump inside,you don't go anywhere near the enemy because all you care about is protecting your own hide so we are left exposed or cant advance without taking losses.
"we provide covering fire"
no you don't, you are only out there to get kills. any shooting you do is because it might get you a kill. your not covering open ground or suppressing the enemy. your purely kill whoring.
" we are team players"
biggest misconception of them all. your in a 3 seater tank and all you want to do is solo in it, if you had a choice you would lock the vehicle and remove the turrets so you could fit more dps and tank. i would hardly call that team oriented behaviour. you complain when someone is in your vehicle who might actually help you spot swarmers or fg before they hit you. instead you still prefer to solo and blame av for your issues or the team on the ground for not killing them before they get to you.
" we spent all the isk and sp to use them so we should be able to do what we want"
a FG user spends alot of sp and isk to do his job dedicated to kill you a swarm user spends alot of sp and isk to do his job dedicated to kill you
only difference your weapons kill everyone the same regardless of what everyone else has fit. also you might die once in 5 games losing a mil isk. mercs on the ground might die alot more times in that same amount and lose alot more isk than you.
people are treating tanks like suits and expect to solo in them the same as a merc solo's in his suit but your wrong. you are a merc first then a tank driver. the tank is an asset same as a piece of equipment thrown on the ground for support or tactical situations. they need to be look at in the same way and not treated and compared to other suits and weapons.
lol, let's see:
1: I literally use My HAV to cover my squad mates. If my slots are full (damn bluedots), then I tell them to get behind me and peek in and out. Also, I use it to block incoming AV fire at other vehicles, so I will get damaged instead of them blowing up.
2: I will either sit back behind the group and lay out suppressing or covering fire for my team to move up and further put pressure on the other team, or I will rush in and scare the **** out of people, therefore distracting them for a moment, and allowing my team to rush in right after me. Half the time, doing so I kill about 1/2 the targets I shoot at (hit detection is making it worse), and get assists on the rest.
3: Actually, the only reason why I and many other pilots hate the small turrets is because they are quite ****. But wait, you don't know that because you don't use them or is a pilot either . Making them better would have us instead of running from people, driving towards them, as good turrets=more wp's. And to clear it up, it's not their DPS; it's the fact that most of the time, it misses, even with the sight right on target.
4: Wait, I'm confused. A swarmer or FGer doesn't have to have someone else aim and shoot their gun. What, you want them to be a two man team too?
5: We don't treat them like dropsuits. You just think we do. You clearly don't understand our problems, and when we say what we want, you and other scrubs say, "No, that's stupid." Or don't comment, when a lot of those said ideas are good. But then you go right around and say that you want us basically gimped without a idiot or a person taken off the board, and when we say no, you claim that we are unfair, and that we are just being selfish. You just want us to be further gimped. Be quiet. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
799
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
R F Gyro wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Explain why you feel it's an excellent idea. Because I really want tanks (HAVs) to be big, bad monsters of the battlefield. I want tanks and AV balanced so that it takes several players using good teamwork to kill them. I want proto tanks that can only be killed by a group of proto AV infantry. However, in order for tanks to be so strong it takes multiple players working as a team to kill them, and for the game to remain balanced, it must take multiple players working as a team to operate them. All the other HAV/AV balance suggestions I've seen so far are based around balancing on ISK, which is doomed to failure as we all get richer. We need to balance the game first and foremost on the most limited resource in Dust battles, which is the players. Balance on that first, and then tune the balance with ISK.
Well, I'll explain why this is a horrible idea, as well as counter your points:
1: I pay for the entire thing, so why should I give half of the purpose of it to a random bluedot?
2: I've not seen that many balancing around ISK, other than reduction in price for specific ones (such as the PROTO turrets that are almost a million), as they aren't balanced with the other's price.
3: Requiring more than 3 or 4 people to kill one HAV with PROTO weapons is imo overkill at that point. The HAV should be able to survive long enough to stay for a short period, and escape, and if they trap it, or have more than enough AV, it's dead.
4: Like I said, we already do require more than just the pilot for a HAV to do well. Backup AV, a Logistics or two and a LLV repping it and the people around it, and gunners keeping the infantry away (well, if they would fix the small turret aim on HAV's anyways), as well as a spotter to tell the said HAV where incoming AV is, and where infantry that needs to be hit is.
|
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
799
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:Really, this got 7 pages??
As someone that doesnt agree with fellow tankers, this thread has made me see what they prolly go through
This is by far, the most stupid "tank thread" i ever seen, but you know, it was made by some guy called "adam and steve"
Troll thread is troll thread
Dear ******., contact me in game and i'll call you a fully specced shield tank, so you can have a turn, as clearly you dont know shite about tanks....
untill then you should just stfu, as your opinion counts for **** all, at the very least you could specced into proto swarms like the rest of us, but no, your rocking that milita gettting all butthurt coz you cant even dent us
if you canrt solo a tank, then you are, a BAD player, end off, you suck dude, and should prolly go play sudoku or some sh!t
You don't need to insult the guy so rudely...... |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
801
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:51:00 -
[16] - Quote
sixteensixty4 wrote:Godin Thekiller wrote:[quote=sixteensixty4]Really, this got 7 pages??
As someone that doesnt agree with fellow tankers, this thread has made me see what they prolly go through
This is by far, the most stupid "tank thread" i ever seen, but you know, it was made by some guy called "adam and steve"
Troll thread is troll thread
Dear ******., contact me in game and i'll call you a fully specced shield tank, so you can have a turn, as clearly you dont know shite about tanks....
untill then you should just stfu, as your opinion counts for **** all, at the very least you could specced into proto swarms like the rest of us, but no, your rocking that milita gettting all butthurt coz you cant even dent us
if you canrt solo a tank, then you are, a BAD player, end off, you suck dude, and should prolly go play sudoku or some sh!t You don't need to insult the guy so rudely......
Clearly i do, or i wouldnt have posted [/quoted]
sigh............ |
|
|
|