Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1215
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP Saberwing wrote: Hey guys
We'd love to provide you with patch notes weeks in advance, but as mentioned elsewhere in this thread quite often features aren't finalized until closer to the release date.
For example, during playtest we didn't feel the Vehicles and Weapons re-balance were quite ready for 1.5 so they've been pushed back, however other features will be seeing full release (squad finder, new WP rewards, updated NPE, bug fixes, etc).
Full patch notes/Feedback Threads to come next week, will keep you in the loop as soon as we get any more info. :)
|
Musta Tornius
Cannonfodder PMC
593
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Original message here: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1311643#post1311643
Sucks to be tankers and dropship pilots, sucks for infantry wanting new weapons too :D haha, as a heavy I'm not getting new content till 2014 so screw you guys, I'm going to blap some tanks ^_^
from IRC:
(12:02:10)<[CCP]Logibro Basically, we weren't happy with how it was when it came time to lock in 1.5 (12:02:22)<[CCP]Logibro So we decided to put some more time into it before we release. (12:02:35)<[CCP]Logibro Good news is there should be stat posts with what we've got so far next week. |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1215
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner.
Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... |
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E
280
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
No surprises there |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
463
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:09:00 -
[6] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:CCP Saberwing wrote: Hey guys
We'd love to provide you with patch notes weeks in advance, but as mentioned elsewhere in this thread quite often features aren't finalized until closer to the release date.
For example, during playtest we didn't feel the Vehicles and Weapons re-balance were quite ready for 1.5 so they've been pushed back, however other features will be seeing full release (squad finder, new WP rewards, updated NPE, bug fixes, etc).
Full patch notes/Feedback Threads to come next week, will keep you in the loop as soon as we get any more info. :)
DAH HELL MAN! LOL I SAID "shhhh!"
That was posted not 5 minutes ago.
`Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST. |
DildoMcnutz
Science For Death The Shadow Eclipse
193
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
damn, I was excited for 1.5, oh well 1.6 I suppose |
daishi mk03
Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic
216
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
It was just a joke.
1.5 will be a vehicle patch as intended. |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together...
I have backed the dropship pilots for a good time now, despite me not personally being one. Until they (CCP) change the cardboard boxes floating in the wind into the flying death machines, I'll continue to stay out of the pilot seat.
Keep in mind that in beta, there were not as many AVers as there are now. The lot of them (the tankers) were all about the "HTFU" motto back then, even as they rolled over teams by themselves over and over again. It is Uprising 1.4 currently and most infantry are armed to the teeth with AV weapons as a backup for when vehicles come into play. What tankers are currently facing is the counter that has already existed. It was not as strongly executed as it is now. There are still some pretty damn beefy tanks out there, despite not being advanced or prototype. I've watch five people, all hurling AV grenades, get pooped on by a lone tank.
What is going on is the weak are complaining while the strong adapt.
I salute you tankers that stay strong and survive, despite you all being annoying asshats and destroying my giggle fits.
Above all. I salute all the DS pilots that have hope. I value your abilities, as I am an infantry unit needing a lift. |
Musta Tornius
Cannonfodder PMC
593
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
a tiny update: New infantry weapons are definately not in this patch.
Furthermore <[CCP]Logibro Kong is bringing more WP rewards. <[CCP]Logibro Including WP for dropship pilots that do transportation stuff. |
|
Ryder Azorria
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
588
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Musta Tornius wrote:, as a heavy I'm not getting new content till 2014 so screw you guys, I'm going to blap some tanks ^_^. Well at this rate, neither is anyone else
1.6 (or even winter expansion 1.0) better be effing huge. |
Bendtner92
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1076
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:12:00 -
[12] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:It was just a joke.
1.5 will be a vehicle patch as intended. No it won't.
CCP Logibro confimed on IRC that the vehicle rework has been pushed back, as well as the new weapons that were coming. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1215
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:It was just a joke.
1.5 will be a vehicle patch as intended.
Please show where it indicates a joke? |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1629
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:14:00 -
[14] - Quote
/quit dust |
Vin Mora
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:14:00 -
[15] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them.
Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on.
|
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1215
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on.
Lol that just indicates bad AV lol, i one shot adv dropships, and completely control Tanks. |
daishi mk03
Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic
216
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:18:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on.
We want more. I want to go 40:0 without using my reppers. I want to drive with my stabilizied proto blaster. I want to be immortal. |
Mortedeamor
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:33:00 -
[18] - Quote
i seriously doubt that u sure he wasnt drunk |
Chibi Andy
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
532
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. |
Foundation Seldon
Gespenster Kompanie Villore Accords
101
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
It's certainly unfortunate since the Vehicle Rebalance pass is something that I've been personally looking forward to for quite some time but I can't blame them if they felt the overhaul needed some time in the oven. Take your time CCP and work out those kinks, I'm looking forward to seeing some raw stats about what we can be expecting in terms of health values / PG amounts / etc. |
|
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
292
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning.
I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise".
People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement.
Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles.
Why aren't you? |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1216
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:45:00 -
[22] - Quote
Look im absolutly fine if CCP needs more time to get it right. This is the right thing to do.
But saying that the most lookforward to feature/changes arent being included, in an offhand comment.... not cool.
Thats offical dev post worthy |
Vin Mora
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:46:00 -
[23] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. Lol that just indicates bad AV lol, i one shot adv dropships, and completely control Tanks. Controlling tanks is useless if you aren't killing them, they can get around faster than you, unless you have vehicle to get around. You can force them from the forward flank, only for them to come around and hit your rear.
Also, you are one-shotting bad dropship pilots in ADV dropships. Good pilots would be able to survive your AV attacks. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
742
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... I have backed the dropship pilots for a good time now, despite me not personally being one. Until they (CCP) change the cardboard boxes floating in the wind into the flying death machines, I'll continue to stay out of the pilot seat. Keep in mind that in beta, there were not as many AVers as there are now. The lot of them (the tankers) were all about the "HTFU" motto back then, even as they rolled over teams by themselves over and over again. It is Uprising 1.4 currently and most infantry are armed to the teeth with AV weapons as a backup for when vehicles come into play. What tankers are currently facing is the counter that has already existed. It was not as strongly executed as it is now. There are still some pretty damn beefy tanks out there, despite not being advanced or prototype. I've watch five people, all hurling AV grenades, get pooped on by a lone tank. What is going on is the weak are complaining while the strong adapt. I salute you tankers that stay strong and survive, despite you all being annoying asshats and destroying my giggle fits. Above all. I salute all the DS pilots that have hope. I value your abilities, as I am an infantry unit needing a lift. LOL NO
5 people spamming ADV AV grenades is far more than enough. Considering damage bonus against armor, that's ~1600 each. If everyone throws one, that's ~8100 damage in one second. If everybody throws all 3, that's ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
So lol, keep lying.
And FYI, I failed math through high school. But numbers don't lie. No tank can survive ~24,500 damage in a few seconds. |
Vin Mora
Sanguis Defense Syndicate
149
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. We want more. I want to go 40:0 without using my reppers. I want to drive with my stabilizied proto blaster. I want to be immortal. -_- You have to earn that position by being good with your vehicle, or having good ground support. Getting rolled by a tank or dropship is not fun, and I personally don't care either way, as long as tanks aren't nigh unkillable when 2+ people (of equal skill/equipment) are engaging them.
|
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
742
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:52:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. LOL No, I couldn't survive that much damage that fast. That's an alpha. That's full HP to less than nothing in 3 seconds. Stop lying. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
742
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you? Do you even pilot bro?
Do you know the sad state vehicles are in now? All it takes is one jerk with ADV anything to easily solo a tank. Why should a tank be soloed? Can't make destroying a tank require teamwork, that's not fair. But, require tankers to use teamwork to survive, but no teamwork to destroy tanks. |
Spkr4theDead
International-Fleet
742
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 11:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. Lol that just indicates bad AV lol, i one shot adv dropships, and completely control Tanks. Controlling tanks is useless if you aren't killing them, they can get around faster than you, unless you have vehicle to get around. You can force them from the forward flank, only for them to come around and hit your rear. Also, you are one-shotting bad dropship pilots in ADV dropships. Good pilots would be able to survive your AV attacks. We don't have ADV hulls. |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
797
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:01:00 -
[29] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you? Do you even pilot bro? Do you know the sad state vehicles are in now? All it takes is one jerk with ADV anything to easily solo a tank. Why should a tank be soloed? Can't make destroying a tank require teamwork, that's not fair. But, require tankers to use teamwork to survive, but no teamwork to destroy tanks. This doesn't simply mean that it should take a team of 6 AV specialists to take you down. That is ridiculous.
Teamwork required to destroy an HAV also involves holding off its infantry support so that 1 or 2 AV specialists don't repeatedly get slaughtered when trying to take out your HAV. |
GTA V FTW
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:02:00 -
[30] - Quote
LOL <----------------------------------- Vehicles working as intended. |
|
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E
281
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. We want more. I want to go 40:0 without using my reppers. I want to drive with my stabilizied proto blaster. I want to be immortal.
Just stick an AR on the turret, you'll be fine |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
293
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you? Do you even pilot bro? Do you know the sad state vehicles are in now? All it takes is one jerk with ADV anything to easily solo a tank. Why should a tank be soloed? Can't make destroying a tank require teamwork, that's not fair. But, require tankers to use teamwork to survive, but no teamwork to destroy tanks.
Um...okay.
I believe you have me confused with someone who was arguing tank semantics.
But sure, talking about CCP's developments could easily turn into a AV vs vehicle discussion?
Why not. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1216
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. Lol that just indicates bad AV lol, i one shot adv dropships, and completely control Tanks. Controlling tanks is useless if you aren't killing them, they can get around faster than you, unless you have vehicle to get around. You can force them from the forward flank, only for them to come around and hit your rear. Also, you are one-shotting bad dropship pilots in ADV dropships. Good pilots would be able to survive your AV attacks.
hahahahaha i want what your smoking |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:LOL NO
5 people spamming ADV AV grenades is far more than enough. Considering damage bonus against armor, that's ~1600 each. If everyone throws one, that's ~8100 damage in one second. If everybody throws all 3, that's ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
So lol, keep lying.
And FYI, I failed math through high school. But numbers don't lie. No tank can survive ~24,500 damage in a few seconds. You imply that they all hit, lol. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
1629
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:LOL NO
5 people spamming ADV AV grenades is far more than enough. Considering damage bonus against armor, that's ~1600 each. If everyone throws one, that's ~8100 damage in one second. If everybody throws all 3, that's ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
So lol, keep lying.
And FYI, I failed math through high school. But numbers don't lie. No tank can survive ~24,500 damage in a few seconds. You imply that they all hit, lol. they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke. |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:22:00 -
[36] - Quote
ladwar wrote: they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke.
As much as people want them to, grenades do not phase through structures. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1218
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:ladwar wrote: they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke.
As much as people want them to, grenades do not phase through structures.
Thankfully most people do know this... and throw AROUND or OVER an obstruction... |
Chibi Andy
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
532
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:25:00 -
[38] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you?
actually im not a tank driver or DS pilot, im pretty much at the point where everything they say is all meh to me.
if they do something good then hurray for them, if they dont want to do it, i couldnt care less.
im just saying that whats the point in being so surprised if CCP decides to move the patch a few months up instead of the said date etc etc
|
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Thankfully most people do know this... and throw AROUND or OVER an obstruction... Yep. The only problem with this is, well, people. By this, I mean the randomness (of people) that causes things to... go wrong.
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
1974
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Guys, please see this thread. I'll lock this one and ask you to post there instead. (Nothing against you guys, just want to keep discussion centralised). CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |