| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Yokal Bob
G.R.A.V.E
281
   |
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:03:00 -
[31] - Quote
daishi mk03 wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. We want more. I want to go 40:0 without using my reppers. I want to drive with my stabilizied proto blaster. I want to be immortal.
Just stick an AR on the turret, you'll be fine |
Duran Lex
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
293
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc
heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you? Do you even pilot bro? Do you know the sad state vehicles are in now? All it takes is one jerk with ADV anything to easily solo a tank. Why should a tank be soloed? Can't make destroying a tank require teamwork, that's not fair. But, require tankers to use teamwork to survive, but no teamwork to destroy tanks.
Um...okay.
I believe you have me confused with someone who was arguing tank semantics.
But sure, talking about CCP's developments could easily turn into a AV vs vehicle discussion?
Why not. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1216
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:07:00 -
[33] - Quote
Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Vin Mora wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Kasote Denzara wrote:Everything is as intended and working properly, spare for the small AR hiccup.
Just wait until the higher tanks come back; a call for balance towards AV can be called, but not any sooner. Tell that to dropship pilots, and tankers that get smashed by anyone with 2 av's to rub together... The pilots and tankers you know must suck, because the RANDOM pilots and tankers that I have met have not be taken down by 3+ people using ADV or better swarms on them. Same goes for when I going against them, if I don't kill them in the 6 shots fired at them from my swarms, I will never be able to. Because they will cycle their reppers, back away, have ground troops kill me, so on. Lol that just indicates bad AV lol, i one shot adv dropships, and completely control Tanks.  Controlling tanks is useless if you aren't killing them, they can get around faster than you, unless you have vehicle to get around. You can force them from the forward flank, only for them to come around and hit your rear. Also, you are one-shotting bad dropship pilots in ADV dropships. Good pilots would be able to survive your AV attacks.
hahahahaha i want what your smoking  |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:17:00 -
[34] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:LOL NO
5 people spamming ADV AV grenades is far more than enough. Considering damage bonus against armor, that's ~1600 each. If everyone throws one, that's ~8100 damage in one second. If everybody throws all 3, that's ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
So lol, keep lying.
And FYI, I failed math through high school. But numbers don't lie. No tank can survive ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
You imply that they all hit, lol. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1629
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:LOL NO
5 people spamming ADV AV grenades is far more than enough. Considering damage bonus against armor, that's ~1600 each. If everyone throws one, that's ~8100 damage in one second. If everybody throws all 3, that's ~24,500 damage in a few seconds.
So lol, keep lying.
And FYI, I failed math through high school. But numbers don't lie. No tank can survive ~24,500 damage in a few seconds. You imply that they all hit, lol.
they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke. |
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:22:00 -
[36] - Quote
ladwar wrote:
they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke.
As much as people want them to, grenades do not phase through structures. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood
Public Disorder.
1218
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Kasote Denzara wrote:ladwar wrote:
they are homing, it you miss with a homing weapon then you fail at life. its like missing the country of russia with a nuke.
As much as people want them to, grenades do not phase through structures.
Thankfully most people do know this... and throw AROUND or OVER an obstruction...  |
Chibi Andy
Forsaken Immortals
Top Men.
532
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:25:00 -
[38] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Chibi Andy wrote:i don't know why everyone keeps expecting CCP to uphold their end of the bargain.
we all know for a fact that CCP has a poor reputation for keeping their promises and also their rep for causing so much bugs in a game after an update.
why are we all so surprised that their won't be weapons and vehicle fixes etc etc
heck heavies have been waiting for something new since the beginning. I don't know why people assume by CCP letting us know their developing intentions, it constitutes "a promise". People asked them to communicate with us more about upcoming patches, and then they get slammed by "OMG, you promised this would happen NAOW!" when they don't feel something is ready to implement. Another fact we know, that they have moved to a monthly schedule of patching. I'm satisfied knowing vehicles will take a few months of patching, instead of the 3/4's to a year it would have taken on their previous development cycles. Why aren't you?
actually im not a tank driver or DS pilot, im pretty much at the point where everything they say is all meh to me.
if they do something good then hurray for them, if they dont want to do it, i couldnt care less.
im just saying that whats the point in being so surprised if CCP decides to move the patch a few months up instead of the said date etc etc
|
Kasote Denzara
A Vulture
259
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:28:00 -
[39] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Thankfully most people do know this... and throw AROUND or OVER an obstruction...
Yep. The only problem with this is, well, people. By this, I mean the randomness (of people) that causes things to... go wrong.
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P
C C P Alliance
1974
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Guys, please see this thread. I'll lock this one and ask you to post there instead. (Nothing against you guys, just want to keep discussion centralised).
CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |