DUST Search - I wish I could mind-control all of you

All Channels

General Discussions

I wish I could mind-control all of you

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 5964	Posted - 2013.09.17 01:38:00 - [1] - Quote So I could make all of you collectively flood the forums nonstop with every post, asking CCP to make bringing back a game mode similar to the original Skirmish 1.0 a top priority; Skirmish 1.0 had one team attacking while the other defends, and the attackers had to destroy preliminary objectives called defense relays before the next set of objectives (null cannons) were unlocked. The devs said its coming, but it isn't a priority at all. It was the best thing about Dust for me when I started in the closed beta. It has been gone for too long and needs to be a serious priority. I'm currently working on a way to hack the consciousness-transfer implants us immortal clones have in our brains to somehow broadcast my mind to every merc so this collective forum QQ whine-fest about Skirmish 1.0 can happen, but mind control via quantum entanglement is hard work.
Patrick57 GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 269	Posted - 2013.09.17 01:40:00 - [2] - Quote +1 It's working...
Killar-12 The Corporate Raiders 1136	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:03:00 - [3] - Quote +1 to the OP... Need Bacon Need Bacon
BatKing Deltor Granite Mercenary Division 179	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:07:00 - [4] - Quote Your jedi mind tricks do not work on me.
Godin Thekiller Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 719	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:08:00 - [5] - Quote I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 5966	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:11:00 - [6] - Quote Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it.
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 138	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:40:00 - [7] - Quote Hah! I remember inspiring everyone to start spamming the objectives with remote explosives! XP Didn't expect it to actually go mainstream though. The turrets in that mode were well placed too, as in opposition to the nearly useless ones that dot our current maps...
The Robot Devil Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION 987	Posted - 2013.09.17 02:53:00 - [8] - Quote Cut my teeth on that map. Running up that hill to the bridge to try to take the gun at the top. Advance to the building with the pipes and then down to the supply depot across the street from the objective. Hack it and hold it to the time counts down. Then we would see the MCC move towards the city as we took the remaining depot on the last hill overlooking the city. Running gun fights to the city to start the hack. Good timesGÇªgood times.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Brutor Vanguard Minmatar Republic 5971	Posted - 2013.09.17 06:14:00 - [9] - Quote I miss SK1.0
Zero Harpuia Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 929	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:04:00 - [10] - Quote +1 to OP KAGEHOSHI for CPM!

Aaroniero d'Lioncourt The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine 82	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:10:00 - [11] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: So I could make all of you collectively flood the forums nonstop with every post, asking CCP to make bringing back a game mode similar to the original Skirmish 1.0 a top priority; Skirmish 1.0 had one team attacking while the other defends, and the attackers had to destroy preliminary objectives called defense relays before the next set of objectives (null cannons) were unlocked. The devs said its coming, but it isn't a priority at all. It was the best thing about Dust for me when I started in the closed beta. It has been gone for too long and needs to be a serious priority. I'm currently working on a way to hack the consciousness-transfer implants us immortal clones have in our brains to somehow broadcast my mind to every merc so this collective forum QQ whine-fest about Skirmish 1.0 can happen, but mind control via quantum entanglement is hard work. Is this game mode similar to BF3's game mode rush?
Asirius Medaius Planetary Response Organization Test Friends Please Ignore 377	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:11:00 - [12] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: So I could make all of you collectively flood the forums nonstop with every post, asking CCP to make bringing back a game mode similar to the original Skirmish 1.0 a top priority; Skirmish 1.0 had one team attacking while the other defends, and the attackers had to destroy preliminary objectives called defense relays before the next set of objectives (null cannons) were unlocked. The devs said its coming, but it isn't a priority at all. It was the best thing about Dust for me when I started in the closed beta. It has been gone for too long and needs to be a serious priority. I'm currently working on a way to hack the consciousness-transfer implants us immortal clones have in our brains to somehow broadcast my mind to every merc so this collective forum QQ whine-fest about Skirmish 1.0 can happen, but mind control via quantum entanglement is hard work. You didn't mind control me per se, but you did however, effectively remind me how much I miss this game mode... +1 mate.
Zero Harpuia Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance 929	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:17:00 - [13] - Quote Aaroniero d'Lioncourt wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: So I could make all of you collectively flood the forums nonstop with every post, asking CCP to make bringing back a game mode similar to the original Skirmish 1.0 a top priority; Skirmish 1.0 had one team attacking while the other defends, and the attackers had to destroy preliminary objectives called defense relays before the next set of objectives (null cannons) were unlocked. The devs said its coming, but it isn't a priority at all. It was the best thing about Dust for me when I started in the closed beta. It has been gone for too long and needs to be a serious priority. I'm currently working on a way to hack the consciousness-transfer implants us immortal clones have in our brains to somehow broadcast my mind to every merc so this collective forum QQ whine-fest about Skirmish 1.0 can happen, but mind control via quantum entanglement is hard work. Is this game mode similar to BF3's game mode rush? To clarify, it was a gamemode with two maps in one. A network of canyons led up to a large open area with eithe Communications or Biomass in it, with the relays in Craterlake needing to be destroyed before the redline changed and the next set of installations deployed. All the while the Null Cannons fired upon the MCC and the MCC scooted across the sky. It would stall at the Relays if they still existed, and would ramp its speed up if all the cannons were out. It was the single best gamemode in DUST, past or present, and we shall hold a candlelight vigil for it's demise every year...
Yan Darn DUST University Ivy League 142	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:21:00 - [14] - Quote Aaroniero d'Lioncourt wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: So I could make all of you collectively flood the forums nonstop with every post, asking CCP to make bringing back a game mode similar to the original Skirmish 1.0 a top priority; Skirmish 1.0 had one team attacking while the other defends, and the attackers had to destroy preliminary objectives called defense relays before the next set of objectives (null cannons) were unlocked. The devs said its coming, but it isn't a priority at all. It was the best thing about Dust for me when I started in the closed beta. It has been gone for too long and needs to be a serious priority. I'm currently working on a way to hack the consciousness-transfer implants us immortal clones have in our brains to somehow broadcast my mind to every merc so this collective forum QQ whine-fest about Skirmish 1.0 can happen, but mind control via quantum entanglement is hard work. Is this game mode similar to BF3's game mode rush? Never played it, but everything I've eve head says yes. While I like the constant back and forth of current skirmish, clearly being on the attacking or defending side means both sides are focused on the objective, which leads to better games IMO. +1
KalOfTheRathi Black Phoenix Mercenaries 725	Posted - 2013.09.17 07:53:00 - [15] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: -- snip yammering -- I wish I could mute you. Is that so much to ask?
Yokal Bob G.R.A.V.E 275	Posted - 2013.09.17 08:50:00 - [16] - Quote ah the possibilities, i would get everyone to convince CCP that chromozone was the best build and they should go back to it
Ayures II Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 284	Posted - 2013.09.17 09:31:00 - [17] - Quote Devs have mentioned before that they'd like to bring it back.

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 1862	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:12:00 - [18] - Quote All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Syeven Reed D3LTA ACADEMY Inver Brass 16	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:23:00 - [19] - Quote Hmm, never played it, but I feel like I want to...

CCP FoxFour C C P C C P Alliance 117843	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:39:00 - [20] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." This man is good with words. Game Designer // Team True Grit http://twitter.com/regnerba


Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 738	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:41:00 - [21] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." I solved all the puzzles in the Ruins of Alph! I can help you!

CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 1871	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:42:00 - [22] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." This man is good with words. It's why I'm on the community team and you're tripping over soccer balls Speaking of which... CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Absolute Idiom II No Free Pass 717	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:46:00 - [23] - Quote KAGE, I like you - you often produce very high quality threads and posts. But CCP shouldn't be ruled by mob rule on the forums. And so a constant deluge of thread demanding feature X or Y shouldn't be sufficient for CCP to start developing that feature immediately. It's already obvious that CCP see value in bring Skirmish 1.0 back to Dust. However they have to prioritise that work against re-working and expanding the core of the game so that it does not remain mediocre. Remember that there is likely a massive opportunity cost in producing a SK1.0 mode.
Aeon Amadi A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 2946	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:47:00 - [24] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." Assuming direct control. We are the Harbinger of your perfection. We will propose to our development team that a 'roadmap' is too mainstream and that a puzzle, with associated pieces for content and features, is the proper way to establish communication between our team and the community. Releasing control. This form is redundant.
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 739	Posted - 2013.09.17 11:54:00 - [25] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." This man is good with words. It's why I'm on the community team and you're tripping over soccer balls Speaking of which... [img]http://i.imgur.com/P1RFIGf.gif[/img] Poor SocksFour. You will never let him live that down, will you? At least buy him a new coke!
Master Jaraiya Ultramarine Corp 778	Posted - 2013.09.17 12:11:00 - [26] - Quote CCP Logibro wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." This man is good with words. It's why I'm on the community team and you're tripping over soccer balls Speaking of which... [img]http://i.imgur.com/P1RFIGf.gif[/img] I was just about to say that!
Rogatien Merc Red Star. EoN. 1196	Posted - 2013.09.17 12:24:00 - [27] - Quote CCP FoxFour wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: All glory to the HypnoWolf KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I'd +1 a petition to bring a same/similar gamemode. They already said on multiple occasions that they will, but my issue is that its not even a priority right now. No one is working on it. EDIT: LogicLoop seems to be the only dev who actually cares about it. Hey man, I care about it Yes we want to bring something like it (maybe not exactly the same, but close) back. It's not really a matter of "this isn't important". It's more a case of "this puzzle piece fits into a section of the puzzle we haven't started assembling, so let's keep working on the bits that are connected and we'll start assembling that section when we have pieces to link onto." This man is good with words. And a wizard with puzzles
Vrain Matari ZionTCD 912	Posted - 2013.09.17 12:25:00 - [28] - Quote Killar-12 wrote: +1 to the OP... Need Bacon Need Bacon And if peeps are gonna stay and play DUST and tumble down the rabbithole in the middle of a firefight and move to New Eden......they gotta have damn fine bacon. Like wild pig pit-roatsed bacon. As per Hans's post keeping us in the loop: http://hansshotfirst.blogspot.ca/ CCP has 2 big priorities right now - fixing the core and player retention. In terms of New Eden and player retention, DUST does not have what EVE has, namely free-roam in a vast, dark, dangerous and heart-breakingly beautiful universe. That means it all comes down to the matches and modes. CCP needs to bring up their game here and use every trick in the book and then burn to book for light as they plunge into the game-design unknown. It's not enough to make maps and modes that mimic the big shooters out there - ours have to tell the New Eden story while providing and arena for visceral, creative gameplay. Our maps and modes have to tell a compelling story that will be etched into players' minds for years to come - Skirmish 1.0 acheived some of this, and that's why players are crying out for it. But CCP can do even better than that. Now that's a lotta fancy-sounding kittenshit, and the only reason i'm inflicting it on peeps is that we've seen it's possible with Skirmish 1.0, which had good enough bones to tell a story on. The battles need to move, need rolling combat, need feints and forays and flanks and rekkies, need stand-and-deliver buying-time moments, need interludes when a deep and soulful silence comes across the battlefield, preceding by only a few moments an escalation to Ragnarok. That is combat in New Eden for immortal soldiers with no way home.
I-Shayz-I Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 937	Posted - 2013.09.17 12:29:00 - [29] - Quote Can't wait. Ever since I first played a game mode like this in Conker Live and Reloaded I've always wanted it in Dust.
Vespasian Andendare Subsonic Synthesis Alpha Wolf Pack 430	Posted - 2013.09.17 14:11:00 - [30] - Quote +1 to Skirmish 1.0, from what I've heard about it. It sounds like a very dynamic play mode, and I'm curious why it was pulled. Essentially, we have 2 game modes now: Team Deathmatch and King of the Hill. The Deathmatch has a short version and a long version. The King of the Hill has a single checkpoint or multiple ones. Aside from two game modes, there's nothing else. No PVE, no sparring grounds, no "skirmish 1.0," no 2v2s, 4v4s, 6v6s, "lone wolves," or slayer. Many FPS players aren't just interested in big team battle deathmatch, and I honestly can't see that adding more variety to the core of the Dust experience--pvp--would hurt retention numbers. Some of the best fun I've had playing Halo was running 2s with a good friend of mine, which was of course mixed in with big team battle, slayer, team deathmatch, king of the hill, etc. Variety is in order here. Certainly new maps are preferable, but maximizing the use of the current maps with relatively easy to implement new game modes could do nothing but help player numbers.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.