|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Raz Sidona
M.T.A.C Assault Operations Command
21
   |
Posted - 2013.09.09 02:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:for why they wouldn't bother playing it? Me and many of my frieds had the same issue. WE bought stuff, thinking it was one way, it ended up being something else. I stayed with Dust. But when they realized they had to start playing all over to actually test/play as something else they dropped it.(they all had between 5-9 million) Thats 6 players lost because the lack of respecs.... Good going CCP / Community.
Good, CCP shouldnt just give out respecs cause someone wants something new, if that was the case then everyone would respec every time something new becomes OP. They should have picked something and stuck with it or saved to get the new item. Respecs are only warranted when the skill tree changes drastically
My friends quit cause of dicks running proto in instant battles. |
Raz Sidona
M.T.A.C Assault Operations Command
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 05:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Raz Sidona wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:for why they wouldn't bother playing it? Me and many of my frieds had the same issue. WE bought stuff, thinking it was one way, it ended up being something else. I stayed with Dust. But when they realized they had to start playing all over to actually test/play as something else they dropped it.(they all had between 5-9 million) Thats 6 players lost because the lack of respecs.... Good going CCP / Community. Good, CCP shouldnt just give out respecs cause someone wants something new, if that was the case then everyone would respec every time something new becomes OP. They should have picked something and stuck with it or saved to get the new item. Respecs are only warranted when the skill tree changes drastically My friends quit cause of dicks running proto in instant battles. Good because if a player gets to proto level he deserves to stomp on other players with them having nothing to do about it....
Its people like you that drive away new players by pub stomping them, so its you who is the problem with this game. getting proto does not give you the right to stomp others, use proto where it matters i.e. PC and FW. |
Raz Sidona
M.T.A.C Assault Operations Command
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 06:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jinx Rollin wrote:Raz Sidona wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Raz Sidona wrote:
Good, CCP shouldnt just give out respecs cause someone wants something new, if that was the case then everyone would respec every time something new becomes OP. They should have picked something and stuck with it or saved to get the new item. Respecs are only warranted when the skill tree changes drastically
My friends quit cause of dicks running proto in instant battles.
Good because if a player gets to proto level he deserves to stomp on other players with them having nothing to do about it.... Its people like you that drive away new players by pub stomping them, so its you who is the problem with this game. getting proto does not give you the right to stomp others, use proto where it matters i.e. PC and FW. PC and FW don't matter though.
PC greatly matters to a corp and to a great portion FW matters |
Raz Sidona
M.T.A.C Assault Operations Command
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 14:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Duran Lex wrote:Raz Sidona wrote:Jinx Rollin wrote:Raz Sidona wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:
Good because if a player gets to proto level he deserves to stomp on other players with them having nothing to do about it....
Its people like you that drive away new players by pub stomping them, so its you who is the problem with this game. getting proto does not give you the right to stomp others, use proto where it matters i.e. PC and FW. PC and FW don't matter though. PC greatly matters to a corp and to a great portion FW matters i like that. matters to "a" corp. lol EoN playing farmville.
EoN isnt a corp, its an alliance. Also thats not what i ment, it matters to all corps its just not accessible to all with the way CCP poorly set it up |
|
|
| |
|