DUST Search - Aim Assist - A tool needed for retards who cannot aim

All Channels

General Discussions

Aim Assist - A tool needed for retards who cannot aim

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1237	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:32:00 - [1] - Quote Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1725	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:34:00 - [2] - Quote but.....but......if you dont like it you can just turn YOURS off.......
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 1691	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:37:00 - [3] - Quote AA currently streamlines combat. Its doesn't necessarily make it better, but it does make it smoother, which is something I like, less clunkiness more smooth moves. TBH I drive tanks now, I don't even know if the AA affects vehicles. Basically Physical in game skill pretty much equates to about 20% of actual game skill.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1238	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:40:00 - [4] - Quote True Adamance wrote: AA currently streamlines combat. Its doesn't necessarily make it better, but it does make it smoother, which is something I like, less clunkiness more smooth moves. TBH I drive tanks now, I don't even know if the AA affects vehicles. Basically Physical in game skill pretty much equates to about 20% of actual game skill. AA does not affect vehicles If you miss you miss, if you hit you hit Doesnt matter with infantry tho, if you miss you now hit so you can never miss
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 1692	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:42:00 - [5] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: True Adamance wrote: AA currently streamlines combat. Its doesn't necessarily make it better, but it does make it smoother, which is something I like, less clunkiness more smooth moves. TBH I drive tanks now, I don't even know if the AA affects vehicles. Basically Physical in game skill pretty much equates to about 20% of actual game skill. AA does not affect vehicles If you miss you miss, if you hit you hit Doesnt matter with infantry tho, if you miss you now hit so you can never miss You can I have done it before.... that's not a good thing but I can miss if I want to. All in all I notice very little distance but I like AA. Sure I could aim sufficiently prior to 1.4 but I stand by my point the infantry Combat is more streamlined than it every was before. I personally don't care either way since my tanks don't get AA.
Cosgar ParagonX 4798	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:42:00 - [6] - Quote I used to use the MD because I've always found it to be a fun weapon. Now I use it because I know I earned the kill against someone trying to hip fire from sniper distance with curving bullets.
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3483	Posted - 2013.09.06 11:59:00 - [7] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill You do realize that analogue sticks are an inferior control method, right? The DualShock controllers have a pretty long history of excellent thumbstick design, but using a thumbstick is still a less accurate means of aiming that some others. Just because the aim assist is a bit too good in its current iteration doesn't mean it should just be axed, and CCP isn't going to do that. They'll keep iterating on it till it works.
calisk galern BurgezzE.T.F 862	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:05:00 - [8] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill You do realize that analogue sticks are an inferior control method, right? The DualShock controllers have a pretty long history of excellent thumbstick design, but using a thumbstick is still a less accurate means of aiming that some others. Just because the aim assist is a bit too good in its current iteration doesn't mean it should just be axed, and CCP isn't going to do that. They'll keep iterating on it till it works. I grew up on ps shooters, I think the mouse is inferior. it's a matter of preference
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3487	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:18:00 - [9] - Quote calisk galern wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill You do realize that analogue sticks are an inferior control method, right? The DualShock controllers have a pretty long history of excellent thumbstick design, but using a thumbstick is still a less accurate means of aiming that some others. Just because the aim assist is a bit too good in its current iteration doesn't mean it should just be axed, and CCP isn't going to do that. They'll keep iterating on it till it works. I grew up on ps shooters, I think the mouse is inferior. it's a matter of preference This is also a factor. I actually first started with console shooters as well, but I'm no better at them with the controller than I am with a mouse. The reality you need to accept is not everyone who plays games online is a "Pro". I may be able to swing this game with no aim assist, but not everyone who plays it will be able to do so, and they aren't all just bad people who want to wreck the game with "aimbot". I mean, most of the same people who have been going on and on for months about how this game drives away new players come right along and **** all over a feature designed to not only help the players we have right now, but to allow for others who play console shooters who might not be "God-Tier" at controller aiming. Is the system a bit to aggressive now? Yes. Will it be fixed? Yes. Will having it in the game in its fixed state be better for all of us? YES.
Lurchasaurus SVER True Blood Public Disorder. 1739	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:20:00 - [10] - Quote aim assist is essential. aim assist is almost completely abstracted. what we have now is anything but a hidden mechanism and needs to be lessened, not scrapped.

Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1240	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:22:00 - [11] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill You do realize that analogue sticks are an inferior control method, right? The DualShock controllers have a pretty long history of excellent thumbstick design, but using a thumbstick is still a less accurate means of aiming that some others. Just because the aim assist is a bit too good in its current iteration doesn't mean it should just be axed, and CCP isn't going to do that. They'll keep iterating on it till it works. If a person isnt accurate they wont hit Give them a mouse they wont hit Give them a DS3 they wont hit Its down to the person and not the input method If they are bad they will be bad but also its what they are used to Im used to DS3 for example, i do play KB+M games but i wish i had 9 fingers so i could move better but i will perform better on a DS3 so does that mean if i use mouse i should have AA? lolno AA isnt needed
Korvin Lomont United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION 138	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:24:00 - [12] - Quote Mobius Wyvern wrote: Is the system a bit to aggressive now? Yes. Will it be fixed? Yes. Will having it in the game in its fixed state be better for all of us? YES. 1. Agreed 2. questionable 3. see 2 ^^
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 99	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:27:00 - [13] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill Mad strafing moron is mad.
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 264	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:39:00 - [14] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill He says this with a straight face about a console controller on a video game. Nerrrrrds!
Brolaire of Asstoria Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 178	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:43:00 - [15] - Quote Cosgar wrote: I used to use the MD because I've always found it to be a fun weapon. Now I use it because I know I earned the kill against someone trying to hip fire from sniper distance with curving bullets. Wanted 514??
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1243	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:44:00 - [16] - Quote Bright Cloud wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill Mad strafing moron is mad. My tank cant strafe
Operative 1171 Aajli Bragian Order Amarr Empire 264	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:45:00 - [17] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill Mad strafing moron is mad. My tank cant strafe Machete don't strafe.
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3490	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:47:00 - [18] - Quote Korvin Lomont wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Is the system a bit to aggressive now? Yes. Will it be fixed? Yes. Will having it in the game in its fixed state be better for all of us? YES. 1. Agreed 2. questionable 3. see 2 ^^ Oh come on. It may take them some time, but CCP has a pretty long track record of eventually fixing just about everything. At this point the Dust team is doing faster turnarounds on content than even the EVE team. If that breaks things sometimes, I'd still say it's worth it for the pace at which we're getting changes and new content.
Soldiersaint Deepspace Digital 445	Posted - 2013.09.06 12:52:00 - [19] - Quote Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill Says the pro player who is sooooo good at this game. If your so good then why do you keep getting smashed by people like me who are oh so bad. Stupid tryhard. Just go take a nap or something.
Takahiro Kashuken Red Star. EoN. 1246	Posted - 2013.09.06 13:01:00 - [20] - Quote Soldiersaint wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Its a fact Auto aim promotes lazyness Why get good when the game can do it for you All FPS games on console seem to have AA because they know alot of players are bad at the game and need this crutch AA is not needed at all If you cant aim you dont deserve the kill Says the pro player who is sooooo good at this game. If your so good then why do you keep getting smashed by people like me who are oh so bad. Stupid tryhard. Just go take a nap or something. Bad player defending his crutch because he thinks he can now aim My AA is turned off anyways but also AA doesnt work in a tank so i already can aim Why cant you aim?


CCP Logibro C C P C C P Alliance 1524	Posted - 2013.09.06 13:03:00 - [21] - Quote Locked for ranting. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics @CCP_Logibro

Monkey MAC killer taxi company General Tso's Alliance 242	Posted - 2013.09.06 13:04:00 - [22] - Quote So here something for you to consider, I tried aim assist thought it was fine, tried with the laser, the ar, the smg, the scr, I never experienced the snap, the input less tracking, or any curving majic bullets. My performace was actually about the same with auto weapons as it was before!! So I turned it off, and guess what, I did better, not just once, not twice, not even 3 times, no I consistemtly out performed my aim assist for the rest of the night!! Please explain this!!


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.