| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order
Amarr Empire
235
   |
Posted - 2013.09.05 13:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
What's up with domination mode?
Make domination mode more give and take so that there actually is a chance to take it away or back from the other team.
It just gets too one sided real quick with no chance of a change over. The new map putting the objective underground makes it worse.
The team that gets there first spams links and camps it with no hope of the other team effectively pushing in and capping it.
On a long enough time line what's to stop people from just leaving the match? Oh wait, they already are.
Some maps are ok. The objective is in an easily accessible place. The one that allow for an enclosed or limited space to camp the objective is repetative and not very challenging.
After that the camping team gets an orbital. Speaking of which why should a winning team need an orbital? I don't recall military battle in modern history that called in an artillery fire when they already had the battle wrapped up. the losing arky would be willing to take that chance. A losing team would be the one's that would want an orbital. Atm it's just a big troll feature. Sure it's based on WP but the entrenched team usually finds it easier to kill the attacking team. Or, at least make the orbital be able to only be laid down so far away from the immediate objective area. |
Annabandak Mercery
Knights Of Ender
42
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 14:13:00 -
[2] - Quote
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:What's up with domination mode?
Make domination mode more give and take so that there actually is a chance to take it away or back from the other team.
It just gets too one sided real quick with no chance of a change over. The new map putting the objective underground makes it worse.
The team that gets there first spams links and camps it with no hope of the other team effectively pushing in and capping it.
On a long enough time line what's to stop people from just leaving the match? Oh wait, they already are.
Some maps are ok. The objective is in an easily accessible place. The one that allows for an enclosed or limited space to camp the objective is repetative and not very challenging.
After that the camping team gets an orbital. Speaking of which why should a winning team need an orbital? I don't recall military battle in modern history that called in an artillery fire when they already had the battle wrapped up. the losing arky would be willing to take that chance. A losing team would be the one's that would want an orbital. Atm it's just a big troll feature. Sure it's based on WP but the entrenched team usually finds it easier to kill the attacking team. Or, at least make the orbital be able to only be laid down so far away from the immediate objective area.
okey , i do like the domi mode , infact i play it all the time. I get your point tho , but for me domi gives insane battles for A.
Often esp on the looser side i have loads of fun try to take a back. wich map do you really dislike with domi? |
Operative 1171 Aajli
Bragian Order
Amarr Empire
240
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 14:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
Annabandak Mercery wrote:Operative 1171 Aajli wrote:What's up with domination mode?
Make domination mode more give and take so that there actually is a chance to take it away or back from the other team.
It just gets too one sided real quick with no chance of a change over. The new map putting the objective underground makes it worse.
The team that gets there first spams links and camps it with no hope of the other team effectively pushing in and capping it.
On a long enough time line what's to stop people from just leaving the match? Oh wait, they already are.
Some maps are ok. The objective is in an easily accessible place. The one that allows for an enclosed or limited space to camp the objective is repetative and not very challenging.
After that the camping team gets an orbital. Speaking of which why should a winning team need an orbital? I don't recall military battle in modern history that called in an artillery fire when they already had the battle wrapped up. the losing arky would be willing to take that chance. A losing team would be the one's that would want an orbital. Atm it's just a big troll feature. Sure it's based on WP but the entrenched team usually finds it easier to kill the attacking team. Or, at least make the orbital be able to only be laid down so far away from the immediate objective area. okey , i do like the domi mode , infact i play it all the time. I get your point tho , but for me domi gives insane battles for A. Often esp on the looser side i have loads of fun try to take a back. wich map do you really dislike with domi?
It's the outposts that enclose the objective area that cause the problem. Any time the objective is enclosed like that with the ability to spam links it's pretty much a given who's going to win. This is between two teams with leet proto squads too not a one sided stomp match. The attacking team is doing a great job at attacking but penetration (that's what she said) is pretty much impossible. |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1137
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 14:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Securing the objective early is indeed critical but I've been in plenty of epic fights where ownership was flipped late in the match and completely turned around. It's becoming my favorite mode. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |