|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
55
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 04:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants?
what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations.
what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack
what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players!
what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp )
I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . .
we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD
it is PvE of course :)
-what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha |
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
55
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 04:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:Nick nugg3t wrote: -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE 1. Something new to do 2. Seriously, tired of shooting the same people over and over again, give me something new to do. -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE 1. Player retention 2. Increases replay value -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha They need to release PvE when Uprising hits. Oh, wait, that already happened and they didn't release it. So it should be in 1.1, no wait, 1.2, actually 1.3....hold on, 1.4. Now that I think about it, it better ****ing be in 1.5.
thanks for your comment. this is the kind of comment i was hoping for. I think 1.6 they should release it. simply 1.freaking6 |
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
64
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 16:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
nakaya indigene wrote:we need to get a petition rolling to get ccp to focus on pve. this game has too many flaws with pvp and too many people squabbling at each other. if we had something that ccp built to distract us while they fixed the game, it might be more enjoyable. we need something that's fun and achievement based.
If there were to be a petition It would have to be done right and with the right attitude. most petitions on these forums consist of grouping together and yelling at ccp to nerf some weapon and they for the most part just come across as annoying and dont get anything done.
If I were to even consider getting a pettition going It would be DEV friendly and inviting as in we all just want some honest feedback and discussion about pve, which we all clearly want.\ It would not to be a trap to capture a DEV and hold him down to his\her knees while EVERY ONE screams at him\her to give them what they want bombarding the DEV with the Petitions OVERWHELMING numbers.
the petition would be to show how many people want PvE and all these people would want some honest answers as to the development of PvE . NOTHING ELSE TO IT. . . .just answers
i have made my point. thanks for your comment :) |
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
65
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 16:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Yan Darn wrote:Nick nugg3t wrote:
-what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE
1) content variety. Including mission types that reward players who invested in something other than infantry/assault.
2) the unique potential for PVE to turn to PVP
-what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE
1) if implemented right, PVE could be a link between DUST/EVE - whether it's killing drones for salvage, scanning/hacking missions for item blueprints or WH locations or the like, mineral heists/escort missions etc.
2) NPE much easier to craft with a PVE element in the game.
-what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha
Probably after 1.6 :(
It makes sense to get racial content out first and that would be December earlier I'm guessing....
thank you for the reply man I never thought about mission types before. . . that is a really interesting and cool idea. the first thing that came to my head after reading that was a heavy. he was slowly making his way through a hallway to be attacked head first by drones. he squeezes the trigger of his hmg letting a storm of bullets keep them at bay. drone bombardment is a cool mission type for a heavy player. if a squad of friends are playing the heavy player can provide sufficient fire support as a scout friend bolts through all the drones dodging his way to the objective point (a hacking point or technology that the enemy drones have stolen from you, something cool like that.)
|
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
65
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 16:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Travi Zyg wrote:Nick nugg3t wrote:It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha 200% backing this post! 300% backing your post about backing my post!! <3 haha |
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 16:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Marston VC wrote:Nick nugg3t wrote:It seems that after the vehicle update (1.5) CCP will have to find something else to work on for dust 514. hmmmm. lets see. what is something that EVERY. SINGLE. PLAYER. wants? what will keep us playing with our friends days on end earning isk (and SP maybe?probably?) for our growing corporations. what will keep our corporations on our toes making sure our districts are safe from random attack what will not only bring old players back but attract and hold the attention of NEW players! what does this quickly progressing game need right now that will make this game OOOO SOOO MUUUCH BETTER THAN IT ALREADY IS!!?? ( I already love dust the way it is, thank you ccp ) I will tell you what it is. . . ahem. . . we need to nerf the aim assi- BAHAHAHA JK XD it is PvE of course :) -what are the 2 main reason why you want PvE -what are 2 reasons why you think dust needs PvE -what update number should ccp work on PvE <---- tarded question I know haha I keep telling you people that were probably not going to get PVE until Christmas at least...... Right now CCP is working on 1.5, then 1.6 will come out, then 1.7, then hopefully they'll just skip to 2.0 and add a boat load of content. I mean, for every month the vehicle teams don't release another vehicle, its not like they didn't do anything for a whole month...... There whole staff is working right now and eventually things will all fall into place! Eventually...... What do you mean by "for every month the vehicle teams dont release another vehicle" ? I didnt get that sorry
And It sounds like your impression of this thread is people thinking CCP is lazy and need to get to work . I am happy to say that is not the tone or point of this thread in anyway .
I am sure you meant nothing by it but let me explain the purpose behind this thread
-honest,insightful, and healthy discussion about the importance of PvE and its potential . - maybe to get a DEV to put his two cents In
|
Nick nugg3t
United Universe Corp
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.06 16:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
LT Dans Legs wrote:Hey wait, I dont want PVE. Thats not every single person. Lol why wouldnt you want PvE? How would it negatively effect your dust 514 experience??
I am actually quite curious
|
|
|
|