Your logic fails. Hard.

Last time I checked, my heavy suit's job description was to get shot at. In fact, if a heavy is doing it properly, he should have several people shooting at him at any given moment. We have the most hp, the largest hitbox, and the slowest movement speed with the most intimidating weapons. Our job description is literally "walking target - with a huge gun", which saves our squishier blues from taking damage.

The problem with the aimbot assist is that it is too good. When people saw a heavy three days ago, panic set in. We didn't take less damage because we were harder to hit - that 10% reduction to our strafe speed amounts to what, less than half a meter per second? Nor do I believe we were being blessed with much benefit from any lag or hit detection problems because of our awful mobility made it impossible to take advantage of said problems. It was because panicking red dots don't tend to aim well while also dodging HMG fire.

Now, the intimidation is gone. Those panicking reds? They no longer have to aim well while dodging HMG fire because their aimbot assist can track us especially perfect given our huge hitbox size and lack of mobility - all they have to do is run side to side and jump up and down with their superior maneuverability while the computer aiming handles the hard part for them.

Scouts are screwed not because of a lack of mobility, but because of their paper thin armor. The aim assist doesn't have to track them nearly as well or for nearly as long.

If you cannot see how broken this is, you need to step down as a CPM member and let someone less biased or more observant handle the task of representing the community at large.

Claiming that people need to use tactics is a serious affront to the majority of the playerbase, it assumes the poster saying this is somehow one of the only ones intelligent enough to know how to hide behind a wall or move in a group, which is a ridiculous assumption to make given that the vast majority of the playerbase already knows how to hide behind walls or move with a group. Even the stupidest of blue dots understands this concept, and assuming you're the Zhuge Liang of Dust because you use the most basic fundamental tactics to give yourself a strategic advantage is hilariously presumptuous.

Congratulations, you've failed to address a single point in my post while stroking your ego (did the aim assist help you target it as well?) for no apparent reason other than you get immense personal satisfaction from doing so.

scouts whernt glitching anymore than anyone else, they where just fast enough to close the distance before you could get good aim on them... not that aimings a problem now. The scout could suomersault its way to you and you almost ever shot will conect due to Easyassist

You can't actually be that dense, right? You're just trolling, right?

Your literal defense of aimbot assist boils down to "STAY IN COVER AT ALL TIMES EVEN AT THE COST OF SHOOTING BACK. LALALALALALA IF YOU'RE GETTING SHOT AT ALL EVER YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE", ignoring entirely one suit's role on the battle field, even when confronted with the fact that it's designed specifically to be shot at. Lots.

Plugging your ears and going "I CAN'T HEAR YOU" doesn't make my point any less valid. There is a suit specifically designed to be shot - if it wasn't designed to be shot at, it would be fast and stealthy (almost like a uh, what're those things... oh right, scouts) - but it's slow, it's got crap mobility, and it has the armor of a tank. Because, again, it's designed to be shot at. It even says so right in the description.

Since you think you're the master of tactics because you know how to hide behind walls, I'm going to assume you know what flanking is. In Dust, a flank only works if someone is taking the enemy fire. Since only a full on ****** is going to shoot at a wall someone is behind (I'm guessing this applies to you?), sometimes distracting the enemy means getting shot. Repeatedly. Until such time as the flankers can get into position to kill the things shooting at you. There are numerous other situations which involve exposing yourself to hostile gunfire, on purpose, for the greater good of the team. If you do not understand this, I'm going to venture a guess you're a solo player with no idea how to work with a team, and that you've got a much poorer understanding of tactics than you would like to believe.

Yes, getting shot, in general, is a bad thing. However, if we were all supposed to never get shot EVER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES!!!!11111ONEONEONE as you seem to think, heavies would not be in the game, logis would be completely useless, and we would all be using scout suits with sniper rifles. This does not sound like a fun game. Judging by the fact that the aforementioned suits do in fact exist, and we aren't all running around in scouts with sniper rifles, I'm guessing CCP agrees with me here.

Again, I feel I need to reiterate, you've got no business being a CPM member. You're far too ignorant of the core mechanics of the game to do any member of this community any good as the medium between the players and the devs. Please do us all - yourself included - a favor and step down immediately.

It's incredible that you can be this moronic and still manage to not electrocute yourself by simply operating a computer keyboard.

In any of my statements can you find my assertion that I think heavies should be able to stand still, in the open, for prolonged periods of time wantonly absorbing gunfire with no semblance of repercussions? No? Because it doesn't exist. I was responding to a nincompoop whose idea of playing "properly" involves never exposing oneself to gunfire at all, which is not only not possible, but a terribly selfish notion held by someone who's clearly incapable of working with a squad and can only quote military doctrine he found on google, not realizing that not all of it translates well into a video game.

In your defense of said nincompoop, you decided to interpret my points in a manner you felt like so that you could berate my intelligence instead of coming up with any logical counter argument to them, because there is no counter argument to them, because my points are correct and everyone knows it. Choosing to accept it on the other hand is an entirely different manner, one which I have no influence over.

As for standing toe to toe with vehicles being "just for the lore" and meaning very little to actual gameplay? I've done it many times over the past 14 or so months. It's not "just for the lore", you're just not good enough to do it, so you write it off as something that surely was not meant to possibly ever happen. It's fine if you want to think that in your head, but as the saying goes, it's better to be silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove the point.

You can stop trying to white knight for IWS or aimbot assist (or both) now. I seriously doubt anyone is going to throw you any virtual brownie points for doing so.

Your logic fails. Hard.

Last time I checked, my heavy suit's job description was to get shot at. In fact, if a heavy is doing it properly, he should have several people shooting at him at any given moment. We have the most hp, the largest hitbox, and the slowest movement speed with the most intimidating weapons. Our job description is literally "walking target - with a huge gun", which saves our squishier blues from taking damage.

You're forgetting to think of one fairly important and rather obvious thing in relation to my post about a walking target.

People without aimbot assist don't always hit a walking target. This is the problem with your entire "counter argument" - you're working on the assumption that everyone should have equal and perfect skill in aiming. They shouldn't, but they currently do with aim assist, and that is the entire ******* problem. The rest of the self-aggrandizing drivel in your post is not worth responding to, but by all means, cool story bro.

Jesus, some of the posts on this forum are so dumb they make my hair hurt.