|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1301
   |
Posted - 2013.08.28 07:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rei Shepard wrote:Raymundo Kagestad V wrote:God dammit CCP. I'm a tanker in Planetside 2, BF3 and...Any other game that involves tanks. Why is it so gimped here! Fix it! I have faith in you!! Not sure how in PS2 its not more gimped, every Assault Infantry there has a secondary weapon that can kill you 1 vs 1 on their backs or at least supress your tank.
the cooldown and cost is low enough that it barely effects the amount of time i spend in them. so its not really gimped all that bad plus you know you can actually see pretty far unlike here. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1301
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 07:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Their not all there so its very hard to say. But so far i say no, i dont like how the active resist is going to be really short in life span and how passive resist is going to be so low. Too easy to kill I want to be one now more than I did before, even back when I was a dedicated tanker in E3. This is the beginning of the end of this ******** Vehicle vs AV fight. funny how the real tankers of dust are considering migration to something else while people like you are wanting to go into a dying class
yea i want a respec of out nerf hammers. just remove vehicles already its clear ccp doesn't know what to do with them or how to balance them. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1302
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 07:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
broonfondle majikthies wrote:Personally I still want my alt to be a tanker. I think this will only change the way tanks are used - and for the better. Right now you mount as much passive protection that you can and a booster/repper to repair the damage. I believe they are encouraging us to go something like;
- Charge in
- Hit the damage mods and/or Hardeners for the assault
- Hit the Nitro injectors for the withdraw
- Hit the boosters/repper to get back HP
Sounds ok to me but will reserve judgement till I can try to implement it
reppers are going to passive only.. or thats what they look like they are doing. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1302
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 07:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:ladwar wrote:Void Echo wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Their not all there so its very hard to say. But so far i say no, i dont like how the active resist is going to be really short in life span and how passive resist is going to be so low. Too easy to kill I want to be one now more than I did before, even back when I was a dedicated tanker in E3. This is the beginning of the end of this ******** Vehicle vs AV fight. funny how the real tankers of dust are considering migration to something else while people like you are wanting to go into a dying class yea i want a respec of out nerf hammers. just remove vehicles already its clear ccp doesn't know what to do with them or how to balance them. I find it extremely funny that CCP can successfully create TONS of starships for EVE yet they cant figure out vehicles for dust...
EVE has PVE to make up for short falls in cost vs effectiveness. dust doesn't and that is why vehicles are falling flat on their faces. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
1304
|
Posted - 2013.08.28 08:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
demonkiller 12 wrote:ladwar wrote:broonfondle majikthies wrote:Personally I still want my alt to be a tanker. I think this will only change the way tanks are used - and for the better. Right now you mount as much passive protection that you can and a booster/repper to repair the damage. I believe they are encouraging us to go something like;
- Charge in
- Hit the damage mods and/or Hardeners for the assault
- Hit the Nitro injectors for the withdraw
- Hit the boosters/repper to get back HP
Sounds ok to me but will reserve judgement till I can try to implement it reppers are going to passive only.. or thats what they look like they are doing. boosters will be instant, reppers will do less per pulse and tank longer to fully use
booster have (A) and repairers have (P)... so yea guess what that means?
Quote:shield Boosters (A): Instant, emergency use high HP restoration in the heat of battle. Ultra-long cool down times.
Last-ditch injection of HP and a kick-start to shield recharge.
Armor Repairers (P): Speed up HP recovery outside of combat
Used to make running repairs between battles (too slow to be of real use in the heat of battle) |
|
|
| |
|