|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1348
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hawk Steel1 wrote:I understand that this is probably the 596th post about the Killer Taxi problem but I just gotta put my 2 cents in. Why not just make it impossible to kill players by running them down. Just like when the ability to run down team mates was changed. Being pushed along is inconvenience enough.
the "killer taxi" problem is not a problem. Its called getting run over by a car. Next build the ridiculous parts will be fixed, but im still gonna be able to use my LAV if i want, just like i can roadkill you in my tank if i want.
for all the crutches infantry get in this game, the least you could do is look both ways before crossing the street.. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1348
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:for all the crutches infantry get in this game, the least you could do is look both ways before crossing the street.. All we want is to be more than just a bump in the road...
then dont sit in the road like a bump. tomorrow you will only get run over by an LAV going at a respectable speed, so any bitching about murder taxis will just be butthurt. I have my jars ready to collect the tears. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1348
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:But you're not putting a 1" plate on a dropsuit, because you won't be able to move. You've never read the description on the Heavy suits, have you? The official lore states that WITHOUT ADDING PLATES, the minimum thickness of armour covering a Heavy suit is 25mm. That's almost an inch of covering on the WEAKEST parts of the suit. Pretty sure adding Plates means more than inch-thick armour. And that's just the armour, not accounting for the extra thickness (and thus weight) required for the sensors, motors and other systems that make the suit actually function as powered armour instead of just slabs of metal attached around a person and preventing them from moving. So yes, a Heavy suit would probably weigh more than half a ton, and it's reasonable to expect LAVs to crash pretty painfully when they hit one.
all your realism arguments are very weak. if you have an indestructable box with a person inside, then crash into it with something at a fast speed, the box might be okay but the person inside will be a paste. heavy suit might not get destroyed but you can bet the force of the impact will kill the merc straight up. it IS a clone in that suit after all. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:At what point in my post are you seeing me state that the guy in the Heavy suit should survive being splattered through the inside of his suit?
I said the LAV needs to be taking significant damage from the impact. I never said the Heavy suit shouldn't be killed from a hard enough hit.
ah, true story dude, my bad |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:Keep in mind the M113 APC has the armour thinkness of 12 - 38mm armour and could easily plow through a moose at top speed Minimum armour thickness is less than half what a Heavy suit has. We don't know the maximum, but looking at the design, there are overlapping sections, so probably close to - if not more than - the 60mm plate you can attach on your LAV. Regardless of that factor though, the HEAVY SUIT should be comfortably able to plow through a moose. The LAV should NOT be comfortably able to plow through a Heavy suit without any damage.
with the heavy's servo-assisted strength that can withstad the recoil of a forge gun, that heavy will straight up punt that moose if he doesnt just pick the thing up and rip it in half with his bare hands. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:Keep in mind the M113 APC has the armour thinkness of 12 - 38mm armour and could easily plow through a moose at top speed Minimum armour thickness is less than half what a Heavy suit has. We don't know the maximum, but looking at the design, there are overlapping sections, so probably close to - if not more than - the 60mm plate you can attach on your LAV. Regardless of that factor though, the HEAVY SUIT should be comfortably able to plow through a moose. The LAV should NOT be comfortably able to plow through a Heavy suit without any damage. How is the minimum thickness less then half of the heavy suit? My Gallenette LAV has over 1400 Armour without plates, around 2600 with plates, im pretty sure my LAV could mangle a heavy suit. Im not even counting the over 1000 HP from shields.
just incase you didnt realize, hp values do not equate to physical armor width.... |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:Keep in mind the M113 APC has the armour thinkness of 12 - 38mm armour and could easily plow through a moose at top speed Minimum armour thickness is less than half what a Heavy suit has. We don't know the maximum, but looking at the design, there are overlapping sections, so probably close to - if not more than - the 60mm plate you can attach on your LAV. Regardless of that factor though, the HEAVY SUIT should be comfortably able to plow through a moose. The LAV should NOT be comfortably able to plow through a Heavy suit without any damage. How is the minimum thickness less then half of the heavy suit? My Gallenette LAV has over 1400 Armour without plates, around 2600 with plates, im pretty sure my LAV could mangle a heavy suit. Im not even counting the over 1000 HP from shields. Minimum armour thickness on a Heavy suit, as per the lore, is 25mm. Minimum armour thickness on the M113 APC, as per the quote I was replying directly to at the time, is 12mm. 12 x 2 = 24 24 < 25 Math is your friend. So is basic reading comprehension. Im not driving a M113 APC though, im driving a limbus. Going by HP numbers if a fully decked out heavy is rocking around 900 armour and my car is at base without armour mods around 1400 I should be able to plow through a heavy. 1400 > 900
space car. end of argument |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
also, infantry needs to get over itself. its called a roadkill. they are common in games with vehicles. dont like it? then get one yourself. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:on another note, If I can jump ontop of a LAV I should be able to knife the driver out of it. You can shoot them out but you cant knife them. Its bogus.
your bogus. i have done it. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1352
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:23:00 -
[10] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Goric Rumis wrote:Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: How does that make sense? >Gets hit by car at top speed >Takes no damage
>Car hits 400-pound deer at 40mph (65kph) >Deer gets instantly killed >Car takes no damage How does that make sense? And yet that's essentially what we have. If the vehicle takes no damage, the person who gets hit shouldn't take any damage either. If the person who gets hit is instantly killed, the vehicle should take substantial damage. Otherwise, don't talk about the logicality of anyone's argument. lol what are you smoking? cars are made of fiberglass...yea there will be some damage. It's a 400 pound dear...something is going to leave a mark.
because a ****** civilian car is made with the same materials and built to withstand the same situations as a military space LAV
edit: incase anyone forgot, LAV stands for light ASSAULT vehicle. |
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1353
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
knife ----> head |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1353
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:also, infantry needs to get over itself. its called a roadkill. they are common in games with vehicles. dont like it? then get one yourself. IT Is common in games with vehicles, true,games where vehicles are not cusomizable, nor soldiers have skills to use them with better preformance,nor vehicles take 4+ hits of Anti infantry weaponry. You are right. It is common in other games. This isnt other games.
Great, so in this game where i CAN spec my vehicle into being able to take more hits and be all around more effective that just solidifies my ability to go for roadkills if i so choose. not saying thats my thing, id rather get out n gun someone down, but thanks for proving my points.
true games......lol |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1354
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:53:00 -
[13] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:
Pickup is made of fiberglass over a metal chassis, my LAV is an armoured vehicle that is better armoured then current day APCs that can run through walls.
Just a perspective, sherman tanks have 76mm of armour, my LAV would have over that with a single plate. Are you saying that a heavy wouldnt get run over by a sherman tank going even 60 km/h and the sherman wouldnt come out fine? Shermans litterally went through houses, abit slowly, but houses.
not to mention the sherman only had rolled steel. LAVs are made of freaking New Eden surprise buttsex |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1355
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:Pickup is made of fiberglass over a metal chassis, my LAV is an armoured vehicle that is better armoured then current day APCs that can run through walls. And a moose is just flesh and bone, that Heavy suit is designed to withstand impacts that would wreck a modern tank. Quote:Just a perspective, sherman tanks have 76mm of armour, my LAV would have over that with a single plate. Are you saying that a heavy wouldnt get run over by a sherman tank going even 60 km/h and the sherman wouldnt come out fine? Shermans litterally went through houses, abit slowly, but houses. Working from DUST lore, a Heavy would probably get tangled in the wreckage of a Sherman tank that tried running it over. Much like a pickup or a moose, a house isn't a military tool, and isn't designed for use in combat, so running through it in a tank is less of a big deal than you're making it sound. An old muscle car can drive through some houses without taking significant damage. Does that means it's a suitable weapon on a modern battlefield? Nope. Is it comfortable running down unarmoured people? As long as they don't shoot it before it hits them, yeah. But if it rammed a Heavy, they probably wouldn't even be slowed down by the wreck like they would if a well-made but old tank hit them. Your LAV is built as a fast open-topped military vehicle. It's comparable to a Jeep in relation to its overall capabilities. The Heavy suit is looking at a comparable level of durability. It's not quite the same, but it's on a close enough level that it's going to shake things around and probably break a few parts when you run the Heavy over.
i picture the whole situation like hitting a baseball with a metal bat. both items are fine after the impact, but the baseball goes *ping* and out over the left field fence. heavy goes *ping* lol and flies 20 feet away, obv killing the guy inside. heavies are big, but LAVs are bigger. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1355
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
while i want to agree with you, i see you going "only 700 lbs" and i facepalm |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1355
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
you realize the heavy suit CANT jump and that the entire suit is a walking tank that would kill the person inside due to the sheer weight if it wasnt for the powered exoskeleton that allows it to carry the heavy weps?
well, might not outright kill the merc, but it is clearly beyond the realm of human strength |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1356
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lets just face it, both heavy suts and LAVs are freaking badass. now all i need is some rocket pistols and a handheld minigun
oh, wait |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1356
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:26:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mossellia Delt wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:you realize the heavy suit CANT jump and that the entire suit is a walking tank that would kill the person inside due to the sheer weight if it wasnt for the powered exoskeleton that allows it to carry the heavy weps?
well, might not outright kill the merc, but it is clearly beyond the realm of human strength but it can jump, about a foot off the ground.
i call that not jumping lol
id get there faster if i rolled |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1356
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
CHIKANO BMXer wrote:you idiots just need to spec into av equipment proximity minds help a lot as do swarmers and forge guns and av grenades i get my ass ran over but i also use lavs all the time grow a pair and learn how to run
pretty much
do people realize CCP is the comapny that made EVE, the most unforgiving, sandboxy game ever? they probs see threads like this and bust a nut laughing at the OP |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1358
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:I'd like you to research kenitics and tell me what happens to a 700lbs object being hit by 10 - 15 tons moving at 60km/h - 100 km/h. Guess what happens, the 700lbs object gets crushed, usually taking the path of least resistance either overtop or underneither the LAV. If the Heavy is only 700lbs (it's probably closer to that amount in kg), then the LAV would, by your own arguments and calculations, only be around 1000lbs. You know what happens when objects with a mass that similar, but with one significantly more dense, collide at high speed? The larger object gets a massive dent in it (a "dent" would translate as "damage" in a videogame, in case you're wondering) and the smaller object remains intact, but gets sent flying (probably killing all occupants if there's someone crazy enough to be inside the thing). Looking at that baseball analogy... ever tried using a hollow metal bat and a hollow metal ball? Because I have (high school science project). The ball (lighter object) went flying, but the bat (heavier impact) bent at the point of impact and had a large dent. LAV takes damage, Heavy dies. Not sure why you guys are missing this logic.
heavy isnt a hllow thing, theres a person inside, much like a baseball has a softer cork core |
|
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:39:00 -
[21] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:KING CHECKMATE wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:also, infantry needs to get over itself. its called a roadkill. they are common in games with vehicles. dont like it? then get one yourself. IT Is common in games with vehicles, true,games where vehicles are not cusomizable, nor soldiers have skills to use them with better preformance,nor vehicles take 4+ hits of Anti infantry weaponry. You are right. It is common in other games. This isnt other games. Great, so in this game where i CAN spec my vehicle into being able to take more hits and be all around more effective that just solidifies my ability to go for roadkills if i so choose. not saying thats my thing, id rather get out n gun someone down, but thanks for proving my points. true games......lol Exactly. We agree for once !
But everything needs its balance. So if you can take more hits because you specced into vehicles,then it should take less hits for me to take that vehicle out if i spec into AV , leaving it at a ''balanced state''. Where no Light Attack vehicle can whistand more than 2-3 DIRECT shots from a rail gun......
LLAVs are ridiculous, this is old news. your post does not relate to a single other vehicle. |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:40:00 -
[22] - Quote
CHIKANO BMXer wrote:doesn't the heavy discription say it can toe to toe with a vehicle
have you been playing with your eyes closed? |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:52:00 -
[23] - Quote
CHIKANO BMXer wrote:Lurchasaurus wrote:CHIKANO BMXer wrote:doesn't the heavy discription say it can toe to toe with a vehicle have you been playing with your eyes closed? no i've been trying not to look at your ugly face
what are you, 12? |
Lurchasaurus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1359
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:54:00 -
[24] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Mossellia Delt wrote:The point is, the heavy is no where NEAR the weight of the LAV Source?
you shouldnt need one, its common sense. whats heavier, a fat man, or a car carrying 3 fat men? |
|
|
|