DUST Search - Tanks in the Garage

All Channels

General Discussions

Tanks in the Garage

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Charlotte O'Dell 0uter.Heaven 1055	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:25:00 - [1] - Quote I have 300 gunlogis and 100 madrugars that will be collecting dust (lol) until 1.5 I hope to god Wolf man compensates for the SL buff with one hell of a tank rehaul. We will need 20,000 EHP to survive on a battlefield where every player with over 6mil SP has at least adv av grenades and proto lolswarms. Just being honest. These are the darkest days yet for us tankers and pilots.
Void Echo Echo Galactic Industries 980	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:29:00 - [2] - Quote starting to think wolfan is as bad as blam was
Aizen Intiki Ghost Wolf Industries Alpha Wolf Pack 509	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:48:00 - [3] - Quote I wonder why he did that as well. I have to think about this for awhile as to why. Maybe he could give us a explanation as to why he did that.
Roofer Madness A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. 145	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:50:00 - [4] - Quote I can only hope they are going to beat us vehicles to death for a month just to narrow down how much of a buff we should get....
marksmn Gespenster Kompanie Villore Accords 13	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:56:00 - [5] - Quote Why u bitching so much many of us tankers could only dream of having the amount of tanks You do
Mobius Wyvern Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY 3264	Posted - 2013.08.23 19:59:00 - [6] - Quote OH MY GOD ONE THING OUT OF THE ENTIRE ***** PATCH MIGHT NOT BE A GOOD THING DROWN THE FORUMS IN BILE AND TEARS BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Can we step back and just calm down, people? I mean, he made a few posts earlier about giving us details on vehicle rebalance next week, but no one has said anything about the Swarm Launcher yet. Why not allow them to at least say what the goal of the change was and how it fits into everything else before we lose our **, shall we?
XiBravo TeamPlayers EoN. 176	Posted - 2013.08.23 20:03:00 - [7] - Quote Properly fitted tanks and llavs are OP. stop all the crying u wieners
Promethius Franklin DUST University Ivy League 184	Posted - 2013.08.23 20:13:00 - [8] - Quote So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating.
Charlotte O'Dell 0uter.Heaven 1065	Posted - 2013.08.23 20:43:00 - [9] - Quote Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. And MD also needs 52% damage buff to counter SL. See, I can use AR logic, too.
BLKDG RoyalSquad514 61	Posted - 2013.08.23 20:47:00 - [10] - Quote Eight shots with an ishikone fg and the tank runs away. Tank if built well are doing ok. Learn to build your kit better. And dont forget the op teamwork that can be had with good tanks and good squads.

Promethius Franklin DUST University Ivy League 186	Posted - 2013.08.23 20:49:00 - [11] - Quote Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. And MD also needs 52% damage buff to counter SL. See, I can use AR logic, too. No, you can cry and moan a lot. It's the only thing you have proven. You aren't even looking for a conversation on the matter at this point. Edit: lol at "AR logic" buffing a weapon that is currently the focus of AR user complaints.
Void Echo Echo Galactic Industries 994	Posted - 2013.08.23 21:03:00 - [12] - Quote Promethius Franklin wrote: Charlotte O'Dell wrote: Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. And MD also needs 52% damage buff to counter SL. See, I can use AR logic, too. No, you can cry and moan a lot. It's the only thing you have proven. You aren't even looking for a conversation on the matter at this point. Edit: lol at "AR logic" buffing a weapon that is currently the focus of AR user complaints. I find it funny your actually taking him seriously
Shadow of War88 0uter.Heaven 34	Posted - 2013.08.23 21:23:00 - [13] - Quote uhm who is responsible for removing the marauders?!
Our Deepest Regret Algintal Core Gallente Federation 47	Posted - 2013.08.23 22:34:00 - [14] - Quote Shadow of War88 wrote: uhm who is responsible for removing the marauders?! I want a marauder. Those look like fun. What's fun like?
Mirataf WARRIORS 1NC 61	Posted - 2013.08.23 22:36:00 - [15] - Quote I Still want to know if wolfman actually even knew about it
Cosgar ParagonX 4537	Posted - 2013.08.23 22:42:00 - [16] - Quote Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be?
ZDub 303 TeamPlayers EoN. 1789	Posted - 2013.08.23 22:47:00 - [17] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be? that might be true... but why not leave this change until 1.5? I mean seriously... why leave it so that vehicles are completely screwed for the next 5-6 weeks? Makes no sense.
ladwar Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn 1235	Posted - 2013.08.23 22:50:00 - [18] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be? i would like to believe that but knowing CCP 1.5 is going to come with massive nerf hammers on vehicles and price spikes and AV is going to get buffed again with 1.4 as a sign of how they vehicles are right now. ccp does tells before they act and this is a really big tell.
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 1059	Posted - 2013.08.23 23:06:00 - [19] - Quote Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. Tankers won't stop QQing until they are 100% invincible and can dominate the entire match single-handily with no support. I see many successful tankers in the game right now, and by successful I mean they dominate beyond belief cause they know how to play and they know how to work with their team. I also run across plenty of tanks that are extremely hard to destroy, so it can be done.
Jason Pearson Seraphim Auxiliaries 2680	Posted - 2013.08.23 23:14:00 - [20] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. Tankers won't stop QQing until they are 100% invincible and can dominate the entire match single-handily with no support. I see many successful tankers in the game right now, and by successful I mean they dominate beyond belief cause they know how to play and they know how to work with their team. I also run across plenty of tanks that are extremely hard to destroy, so it can be done. False. Tankers will stop complaining when it doesn't cost them 5 matches worth of ISK for a single death. King of the Forums // Seraphim <3 Comment and like this thread about PvE, Here! Also, check out the Indirect Fire ability, Here! gbghg wrote: CCP Rejavik CCP Shanghia Same company different studios, one has near perfected the player feedback process, the other is still rolling on the floor after it fell over its first baby step.

Poplo Furuya Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 707	Posted - 2013.08.23 23:16:00 - [21] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be? It's poor procedure to implement one half of a X versus X balance pass a month in advance. That has been one of my trains of thought... but no, I'm not convinced there is a method to this particular madness. Even if that is the game plan, well... refer to point one. It also makes Swarms the premiere AV weapon unless they're bringing all other alternatives up to par when they potentially superbuff vehicles. Which again begs the question, why Swarm Launchers, why now? There may be a design here, it sure as hell ain't sensible design though.
Tebu Gan CrimeWave Syndicate 39	Posted - 2013.08.23 23:32:00 - [22] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be? No I haven't, and I shant know until 1.5, good thinkin there. Though buffing them before the vehicle buff seems a little insane to me. Why?
Charlotte O'Dell 0uter.Heaven 1078	Posted - 2013.08.24 04:37:00 - [23] - Quote When it doesn't take 6 games to cover one death, or my tanks can last six games without being destroyed, I'll stop complaining. Until then, I'll be redline sniping with a rail or rooftop camping with MD.
Void Echo Echo Galactic Industries 1003	Posted - 2013.08.24 04:43:00 - [24] - Quote Cosgar wrote: Has anyone stopped to think that the "buff" to swarm launchers is in preparation of how epic vehicles are going to be? at 1st I thought that.. but then I remembered that this is CCP were dealing with
Void Echo Echo Galactic Industries 1003	Posted - 2013.08.24 04:47:00 - [25] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: Promethius Franklin wrote: So a tank should take 12 swarms or AV grenades to take out before hardners, reps or LLAV support, all of which can greatly increase a tanks life span. And this with no particular restriction to number of tanks deployable. Your concept of balance is fascinating. Tankers won't stop QQing until they are 100% invincible and can dominate the entire match single-handily with no support. I see many successful tankers in the game right now, and by successful I mean they dominate beyond belief cause they know how to play and they know how to work with their team. I also run across plenty of tanks that are extremely hard to destroy, so it can be done. that's completely false, you do know that right? perhaps the reason you think that requiring at least 3 people to kill a tank makes us invincible, then that just means your just to stupid to use teamwork in the 1st place.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.