|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
Top Men.
860
   |
Posted - 2013.08.23 04:24:00 -
[1] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Its against females. The old stripper walk was definitely derogatory.
Yes cuz we all know proper ladies with good breeding walk like lumberjacks with hemorrhoids.
Also please don't talk down to strippers.
I have more respect for a stripper then some fundamentalist wackjob with a BA in women's studies. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
Top Men.
864
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 05:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:hooc order wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:Its against females. The old stripper walk was definitely derogatory. Yes cuz we all know proper ladies with good breeding walk like lumberjacks with hemorrhoids. Also please don't talk down to strippers. I have more respect for a stripper then some fundamentalist wackjob with a BA in women's studies. I'm a fundamentalist for respecting women? Who knew... Meanwhile you think of women as tools for your own sexual needs, sad. No one needs your respect or mindless hate.
Strawman much?
It should be pointed out that you are upset because i want my robot avatar to walk more like a real woman rather then like Godzilla.
And from that you projected claims that I hate women and think they are nothing more then tools for my sexual needs.
WOW!
I was not directing the fundamentalist wackjob with a BA in women's studies at you by the way. I have no idea who you are and was only pointing how low i think such a person was compared to a stripper....but if i did i sure got the fundamentalist wackjob right.
Note: My respect comparison, although accurate, exists in a vacuum with no relation to other people or occupations.
Let me fix that. A stripper in my view is a person with a job. No different then a game developer or a plumber. While a fundamentalist wackjob with a BA in women's studies i view in the same light as fundamentalist wackjob standing on a podium telling everyone God wants gays and evolutionists to burn in hell. I hope that clears that up. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
Top Men.
871
|
Posted - 2013.08.23 10:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:
In your first post you argue for hyper sexualization. Throw out slander in the response to me which you now say was directed at no one. After getting called on it cry strawman fallacy.
That is priceless.
If you can't see what the problem with the female animations on the warbarge were then it's time for some introspection.
PS Not impressed with the Ad Hominem over substance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIkQtWmXKaw
Here is a video made by a couple of lesbians trying to help transsexuals transitioning from men to women.
It is anatomy. Women walk different and when they do it does not look like Sasquatch gamboling through a forest.
This is not "hyper sexualized" patriarchal oppression.
Now please take your moon bat religion elsewhere. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic
Top Men.
888
|
Posted - 2013.08.25 00:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aria Gomes wrote:THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote:i was always following females on warbarge when they had the sexy walk
now i dont care , they just dudes with big ass and wide hips aka shemales
CCP give in again to a silly demand because some ugly female doesnt know how to walk like a woman and she hates men Every woman does not have a sexy walk though. I know I have the gayest walk ever. My friends either tell me it's my swagger or I look like I'm ready to go somewhere important. I know my walk is far from sexy but that dosn't mean that I hate men or I'm some butch Justin Bieber dressing lesbian. Quite the opposite actually. I like men...(women a little more cause we're gorgeous.) and i don't wear mens clothing. Every woman is different abd not every woman has a sexy walk.
Quote:Every woman does not have a sexy walk though.
Every woman walks like a women which is noticeably different then a man's walk.
Men are attracted to women because they are women and because the things that make women different from men.
By definition if women's walk is different and if men are attracted to the differences women have then every women's walk is sexy.
ie a women walking a normal woman's walk is a "sexy walk".
On the surface it would appear those who oppose women in dust walking anatomically correctly do so because they hate the fact that men are attracted to how women walk...ie they hate male sexuality.
But I only think this is partially true.
Male sexuality is only a proxy for what they really hate. It reminds them of what they hate. What i think the problem is that the people complaining in fact hate the fact that women are different. They hate the very things that make a woman a woman. In other words they hate women. |
|
|
| |
|