|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
814
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Yes, the new players here are complete morons like that one in the video, he dident know what hes doing and got himself blown up! The mentality of most tankers are biased by the totally noobisim, its ********. Actually, it is justified because all the veteran tanks stoped playing or switched classes because tanks are no longer fun to play, all the AV was buffed and all the tanks were nerfed, only someone new to dust would really want to play tanks now. Of course, a select few of us vets still do tank and we do not often put our tanks in harms way, charge infaintry at AV nade range with railguns or even attempt to enter their range at all! We are great tankers. Too bad we dont tank anymore tho, its really not worth it and ppl running around with AV nades powerfull enough for a single person with a nanohive to kill you before you run away is one of them.
How can you say the playerbase will drop if the AV nades are taken away or balanced? There is proper AV in this game and they are all brutally and unfairly effective. so effective, in fact there is no way for tanks to deal with them, we have standard vehicals vs proto, max skilled AV and we die. AV nades should be removed or made more reasonable, its a grenade. You killed that tank in about 4 seconds and it was a sica, resistant to explosives. That is a proto AV nade. The best we have are standard tanks and shield tanks arnt even usable, its all about armor tanking. Thats even weaker to AV nades, of course it does too much damage. Just think, what if you had 2 ppl throwing grenades? 3 second pop on milita and standard tanks?
Their grenades! There is proper AV in this game, and a grenade should never 3 shot a tank! Yes, im saying someone with an assault rifle should loose against a tank every single time, no questions asked gaurentee die vs a tank unless he has mines or det packs. Am i wrong to say that?
|
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
815
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Yes, the new players here are complete morons like that one in the video, he dident know what hes doing and got himself blown up! The mentality of most tankers are biased by the totally noobisim, its ********. Actually, it is justified because all the veteran tanks stoped playing or switched classes because tanks are no longer fun to play, all the AV was buffed and all the tanks were nerfed, only someone new to dust would really want to play tanks now. Of course, a select few of us vets still do tank and we do not often put our tanks in harms way, charge infaintry at AV nade range with railguns or even attempt to enter their range at all! We are great tankers. Too bad we dont tank anymore tho, its really not worth it and ppl running around with AV nades powerfull enough for a single person with a nanohive to kill you before you run away is one of them.
How can you say the playerbase will drop if the AV nades are taken away or balanced? There is proper AV in this game and they are all brutally and unfairly effective. so effective, in fact there is no way for tanks to deal with them, we have standard vehicals vs proto, max skilled AV and we die. AV nades should be removed or made more reasonable, its a grenade. You killed that tank in about 4 seconds and it was a sica, resistant to explosives. That is a proto AV nade. The best we have are standard tanks and shield tanks arnt even usable, its all about armor tanking. Thats even weaker to AV nades, of course it does too much damage. Just think, what if you had 2 ppl throwing grenades? 3 second pop on milita and standard tanks?
Their grenades! There is proper AV in this game, and a grenade should never 3 shot a tank! Yes, im saying someone with an assault rifle should loose against a tank every single time, no questions asked gaurentee die vs a tank unless he has mines or det packs. Am i wrong to say that?
Maple.... I was not able to destroy your tank with my solo proto av nades on several occasions. I believe you under estimate the strength of your tank brother....... I know better
Not trying to personally attack you dont worry :) but yeah you dident solo my tank bcuz i got away, dident want to be AV naded cuz iknow what they do to me... massive damage. Its just too much, they should be more supplimental damage and not primary AV means. They really are, you dont have to play deffensively with them ppl actively hunt tanks and sneak up them. This video shows a tank can not accelerate in time to escape an AV nade ambusher. Its brutally effective, grenades just shouldent do that |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
816
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:lowratehitman wrote:Exmaple Core wrote:Yes, the new players here are complete morons like that one in the video, he dident know what hes doing and got himself blown up! The mentality of most tankers are biased by the totally noobisim, its ********. Actually, it is justified because all the veteran tanks stoped playing or switched classes because tanks are no longer fun to play, all the AV was buffed and all the tanks were nerfed, only someone new to dust would really want to play tanks now. Of course, a select few of us vets still do tank and we do not often put our tanks in harms way, charge infaintry at AV nade range with railguns or even attempt to enter their range at all! We are great tankers. Too bad we dont tank anymore tho, its really not worth it and ppl running around with AV nades powerfull enough for a single person with a nanohive to kill you before you run away is one of them.
How can you say the playerbase will drop if the AV nades are taken away or balanced? There is proper AV in this game and they are all brutally and unfairly effective. so effective, in fact there is no way for tanks to deal with them, we have standard vehicals vs proto, max skilled AV and we die. AV nades should be removed or made more reasonable, its a grenade. You killed that tank in about 4 seconds and it was a sica, resistant to explosives. That is a proto AV nade. The best we have are standard tanks and shield tanks arnt even usable, its all about armor tanking. Thats even weaker to AV nades, of course it does too much damage. Just think, what if you had 2 ppl throwing grenades? 3 second pop on milita and standard tanks?
Their grenades! There is proper AV in this game, and a grenade should never 3 shot a tank! Yes, im saying someone with an assault rifle should loose against a tank every single time, no questions asked gaurentee die vs a tank unless he has mines or det packs. Am i wrong to say that?
Maple.... I was not able to destroy your tank with my solo proto av nades on several occasions. I believe you under estimate the strength of your tank brother....... I know better Not trying to personally attack you dont worry :) but yeah you dident solo my tank bcuz i got away, dident want to be AV naded cuz iknow what they do to me... massive damage. Its just too much, they should be more supplimental damage and not primary AV means. They really are, you dont have to play deffensively with them ppl actively hunt tanks and sneak up them. This video shows a tank can not accelerate in time to escape an AV nade ambusher. Its brutally effective, grenades just shouldent do that your squad killed me after I already made you poop your pant :) If I could only hear the comms.... but regardless... the player base will drop, you remember when tanks dominated the battlefield...... and that's what I am basing it all on, is knowledge, cause history will repeat itself.
oh, so i dident even escape on my own means? Comms are pretty calm generally, im used to lone AV nades killing me dispite my very best tactical efforts to avoid them. Including the natural resist on my tank i have 50 to 60% passive resist on my tank, pending on which fit im using. Your 3 or 4 AV nades almost killed me and would have if i dident have a squad... its a grenade man, its not a swarm of anti tank rockets and is certain no energy cannon of tank destruction why should that little thing do as much damage?? Tanks ran the battlefeild in chrome because they were advanced level, because ppl did not work together to destroy them. AV nades still CRUSHED standard vehicals and repeled ADV tanks. Tho to be fair, 4 or 5 AV nades would bring an ADV shield tank down to half shields and brought down the ADV armor tanks even harder, it was still effective and more on the lines of a supplimental grenade. How it should be!! if you want to destroy tanks, you should be using forges, swams or other tanks!! AV grenades should never, ever be a reliable and effective form of AV its ********, you SHOULD die if you dont have an AV weapon VS a tank |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
817
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
lowratehitman wrote:The key is not nerfing AV...yet actually balancing the vehicles correctly...
Agree. it took more than 4 AV grenades to kill a tank back in chrome when tanks were more properly balanced |
Exmaple Core
Ancient Exiles
818
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 07:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:lowratehitman wrote:The key is not nerfing AV...yet actually balancing the vehicles correctly... If vehicles were re-balanced to the point that AV grenades were a hard counter to LAVs, but a minor/moderate threat to HAV to the point that you needed an AV weapon to take one out, would that make sense? If tanks are rock, infantry is scissors, and AV is paper, why should scissors get to run with paper?
yes, exactly. you just earned another like |
|
|
|