|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
2522
   |
Posted - 2013.08.15 21:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
Heathen Bastard wrote:[
I'm not being killed by them. But they are enough to force a retreat. My 2m isk 8m SP "toy" as you call it is being invalidated by something that requires 0 ******* SP, AND LESS THAN 2000 ISK. The dev who thought these were a good idea needs to be kicked in the balls by a Glaswegian soccer player.
Even infantry players want that bullshit cannon gone.
So you think you shouldn't retreat at all and should be able to just sit there and butcher infantry all day?
Your proportional cost argument is completely invalid - a militia assault rifle is perfectly capable of driving off or killing a prototype suit.
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
2522
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 21:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:Argon Gas wrote:Heathen Bastard wrote:
I'm not being killed by them. But they are enough to force a retreat. My 2m isk 8m SP "toy" as you call it is being invalidated by something that requires 0 ******* SP, AND LESS THAN 2000 ISK. The dev who thought these were a good idea needs to be kicked in the balls by a Glaswegian soccer player.
Even infantry players want that bullshit cannon gone.
Good, it makes you retreat so you can't kill everyone freely in a pub match. It takes proto gear to actually destroy you. Militia assault rifles can still melt proto suits, get over it. and you think that's right? COD is that way =============>
And you think it's wrong that you're not invincible? |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
2522
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 22:15:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:[
and you think that's right?
COD is that way =============> And you think it's wrong that you're not invincible? and you keep claiming we want god mode when every time weve had this specific argument we give you proof that we don't and all we want is actual balance.
Where is this proof you speak of?
You just stated that you thought it was wrong that low-level anti-vehicle weapons should be able to even drive you off. If you can't be driven off or destroyed, what can they do to protect themselves against you? Nothing, and that would be a problem.
I don't disagree that tanks need some rebalancing. I do, however, disagree very strongly with the idea that AV should be so ineffective against tanks. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514
2526
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 22:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shokhann Echo wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Shokhann Echo wrote:[
and you think that's right?
COD is that way =============> And you think it's wrong that you're not invincible? and you keep claiming we want god mode when every time weve had this specific argument we give you proof that we don't and all we want is actual balance. Where is this proof you speak of? You just stated that you thought it was wrong that low-level anti-vehicle weapons should be able to even drive you off. If you can't be driven off or destroyed, what can they do to protect themselves against you? Nothing, and that would be a problem. I don't disagree that tanks need some rebalancing. I do, however, disagree very strongly with the idea that AV should be so ineffective against tanks. only militia AV weaponry should be ineffective, it requires no SP to get and very little ISK to buy.. all other AV should be deterrent and any Proto AV should be able to one shot Standard and militia tanks, but 2 shot advanced tanks and 3 shot prototype tanks, only then would it be equal.. militia AV is severely broken, if you want to kill vehicles, SKILL UP INTO AV, THATS WHAT AV IS FOR (ANTI-VEHICLE)
If militia AV is completely ineffective, what's the point?
Also I think proto AV one shotting STD/MLT tanks is too powerful - it should at least take a couple of shots. Hell, if proto tanks are more expensive than the current ones 3 shotting is too much.
I'd just like to see a slight buff to tanks and more importantly a price slash. A big price slash. |
|
|
| |
|