|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
low genius
the sound of freedom
Renegade Alliance
292
   |
Posted - 2013.08.14 18:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gene Rokel wrote:New Game Network Dust514 ReviewHe has alot of valid points, one being the shoving of "Buy Aurum" in your face all the time, framerates, dull graphics and the connection to eve non existant. He is very accurate, CCP please read and take notes, as this is the average reaction to this game.
that's a 45, not a 4.5.
more than that, it's some review of a guy who hasn't even played dust. sad, really. reviews have been bs since the '90s
|
low genius
the sound of freedom
Renegade Alliance
294
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 00:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Gene Rokel wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:R'adeh Hunt wrote:Eve had pretty horrible ratings too at the start. I recall one of CCP's early publishers back in 2003 asked CCP if this [Eve Online] was it after looking at the gameplay and graphics. How many years are you going to sit here and play this dull loby shooter? Its not a spreadsheet in space, its a lobby shooter, quit comparing eve and dust's launch success. Do you really think dust at this pace can keep up with any other persistant shooters? Just look at the content Planetside 2 has released in 8 months, sht tons of content, fixes and re-mapping. Dust has crawled to a near halt, because the $$$ is not coming in at the moment, so the employees are few and too far between. My god what a fanboi, game gets 4.5 and he says I recall when eve launched..... lool siccos
you? not very long. you're a soft-core gamer.
this is a hardcore gamer type of a title. and it wasn't a 4.5 it was a 45. if reading comprehension is a problem, you're going to hate dust. |
low genius
the sound of freedom
Renegade Alliance
301
|
Posted - 2013.08.15 17:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Gene Rokel wrote:Sgt Pseudo wrote:Gene Rokel wrote:Sgt Pseudo wrote:Gene Rokel wrote:
[...]
Are you defending dust with the reviewers terrible analogy?
Lool it is a 4.5/10 you can do better than that cant you?
Nope. But I made another mistake: I didn't read it to the end before I posted here  Last sentence in the review: "[...] Perhaps one day it will be. Lamborghini started out making farm equipment, I hear." Your right he did leave it open to hope which is what has fueled this fanboi driven game for the last year and look where we are. Even if your argument is somewhat true, I don't think that's fair to say that way: it isn't (!) released for a year at all. The issue is the game has been in developement for 8 years, I personally have been playing for over a year and VERY VERY little has been done. I mean entire games are built in a year, what is so complicated with dust? It is the fact ccp has never built a fps and they believe they have all the time in the world, because they built eve and it took time. Also with only 28 people working on dust not much can happen. If profits were viable more would be brought in but we all know dust is not profiting ATM. Well REALITY CHECK fps console fans wont wait like the spreadsheet in space that eve is.
i think this guy needs to read more, or something. |
|
|
| |
|