[REQUEST] Infantry Shield Transporter - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1107071#post1107071
Status: Good idea, we can add this, but after we balance armor vs. shield tank first.

ARE THEY TOUCHED IN THE HEAD?!?

Why the hell would CCP add a "shield repair gun" when shields already TRUMP armor.

[REQUEST] Infantry Shield Transporter - https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1107071#post1107071
Status: Good idea, we can add this, but after we balance armor vs. shield tank first.

ARE THEY TOUCHED IN THE HEAD?!?

Why the hell would CCP add a "shield repair gun" when shields already TRUMP armor.

status: Good idea, we can add this, but after we balance armor vs. shield tank first.

I take it you missed this bit

I saw it, the problem is even if shield v armor is balanced, a "shield repair gun" would take that balance and throw it out the window.

It's a complicated area, all we can do is wait and see. A infantry shield transporter could be interesting addition if done right.

I saw it, the problem is even if shield v armor is balanced, a "shield repair gun" would take that balance and throw it out the window.

Given you don't know how the balance will be done, you are assuming a lot.

I saw it, the problem is even if shield v armor is balanced, a "shield repair gun" would take that balance and throw it out the window.

Not if the Shield Repair Tool reps less HP/s.

I'd be all for Complex Extenders being brought down to 44, making it 22/33/44. The backlash would be incredible though. We would probably be better off if they hadn't made it such a huge jump from Enhanced to Complex in the first place.