|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5344
   |
Posted - 2013.08.09 09:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
AR doesn't need help IMO. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5345
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 09:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
gabriel login wrote:BrownEye Awseom wrote:So there can be even more complaining about the AR.....fiine how it is. A reddot would be just plain silly. No need to make it any more desirable. Now if you attach a Nova Knife on the end of it you would be on to something. what kind of thinking is that the ar is the main battlefield weapon an as such is a jack of all trades good at most things but not great at everything. an in what game now a day dont ars have reddot sight i mean this is the future right.
AR doesn't need it, AR is fine as is.
This game is such a poor representation of what future combat would be like, I don't think the "its the future" argument really matters. I think if it was believable, EVE ships would just use their ship drones for planetary battles, or just shoot any threat from orbit (instead of just being limited for minor support), if there is a job requiring intelligence beyond drone AI then people would just remote control giant badass hovering drones through quantum entanglement instead of using their squish slow weak clone bodies. There are a thousand little things I could nitpick with this game being futuristic (like hand-tossed grenades), the AR not having an optic sight is not even odd considering all that. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5345
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 09:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Catina Mercia wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:gabriel login wrote:BrownEye Awseom wrote:So there can be even more complaining about the AR.....fiine how it is. A reddot would be just plain silly. No need to make it any more desirable. Now if you attach a Nova Knife on the end of it you would be on to something. what kind of thinking is that the ar is the main battlefield weapon an as such is a jack of all trades good at most things but not great at everything. an in what game now a day dont ars have reddot sight i mean this is the future right. AR doesn't need it, AR is fine as is. This game is such a poor representation of what future combat would be like, I don't think the "its the future" argument really matters. I think if it was believable, EVE ships would just use their ship drones for planetary battles, or just shoot any threat from orbit (instead of just being limited for minor support), if there is a job requiring intelligence beyond drone AI then people would just remote control giant badass hovering drones through quantum entanglement instead of using their squish slow weak clone bodies. There are a thousand little things I could nitpick with this game being futuristic (like hand-tossed grenades), the AR not having an optic sight is not even odd considering all that. Yeah, because putting a sight on the AR will ruin the entire balance of the game and make it burn in the fires of hell >_>
If its such a small thing, then you don't need it. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5345
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 09:56:00 -
[4] - Quote
Vulcanus Lightbringer wrote:Doesn't the Burst AR have a sight? Or is it the Breach?
Burst and tactical have scopes. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5345
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 11:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Korvin Lomont wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:gabriel login wrote:BrownEye Awseom wrote:So there can be even more complaining about the AR.....fiine how it is. A reddot would be just plain silly. No need to make it any more desirable. Now if you attach a Nova Knife on the end of it you would be on to something. what kind of thinking is that the ar is the main battlefield weapon an as such is a jack of all trades good at most things but not great at everything. an in what game now a day dont ars have reddot sight i mean this is the future right. AR doesn't need it, AR is fine as is. This game is such a poor representation of what future combat would be like, I don't think the "its the future" argument really matters. I think if it was believable, EVE ships would just use their ship drones for planetary battles, or just shoot any threat from orbit (instead of just being limited for minor support), if there is a job requiring intelligence beyond drone AI then people would just remote control giant badass hovering drones through quantum entanglement instead of using their squish slow weak clone bodies. There are a thousand little things I could nitpick with this game being futuristic (like hand-tossed grenades), the AR not having an optic sight is not even odd considering all that. After reading all the EVE books I have to disagree there is a need for Infantry controlled groundbattles at least for the "great houses" and surely to a certain degree for corporations as well as annihilating erverthing from space means less profit when you simply can take the stuff over. Futuristic sights and weapons would be a great plus for the game at least for the representation its sad that all the stuff is just so basic and uncreative. On a sidenote all weapons could use more futuristic sights not only the AR even the reddot of the ScR is really only a basic one.
They could still just use drones controlled by real people instead of squishy humans. |
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf
Brutor Vanguard
Minmatar Republic
5345
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 11:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
CrotchGrab 360 wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:gabriel login wrote:BrownEye Awseom wrote:So there can be even more complaining about the AR.....fiine how it is. A reddot would be just plain silly. No need to make it any more desirable. Now if you attach a Nova Knife on the end of it you would be on to something. what kind of thinking is that the ar is the main battlefield weapon an as such is a jack of all trades good at most things but not great at everything. an in what game now a day dont ars have reddot sight i mean this is the future right. AR doesn't need it, AR is fine as is. This game is such a poor representation of what future combat would be like, I don't think the "its the future" argument really matters. I think if it was believable, EVE ships would just use their ship drones for planetary battles, or just shoot any threat from orbit (instead of just being limited for minor support), if there is a job requiring intelligence beyond drone AI then people would just remote control giant badass hovering drones through quantum entanglement instead of using their squish slow weak clone bodies. There are a thousand little things I could nitpick with this game being futuristic (like hand-tossed grenades), the AR not having an optic sight is not even odd considering all that. Yeh let's just make an FPS game where everybody just stares at a star map and everything is automated. let's make a realistic futuristic game!!
I never said it should be like that, I'm saying it's perfectly normal for the AR not to have futuristic sights since there are tons of things that common sense would suggest should be more futuristic but aren't. Basically the futuristic argument doesn't matter since nothing is really as futuristic as it should be anyway.
Actually though, it would be pretty fun to play an FPS where you remote control a badass hovering killer drone, and get to see what it sees. It would be kind of like a first person mech game, like Hawken. |
|
|
| |
|