|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers
EoN.
904
   |
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
FLAYLOCK Steve wrote:This poll isn't to cry that it's OP. It's to prove a point, how many of you would say the Assault Rifle out guns every gun in the game. Even with the game has a crappy aiming system and major hit detection issues the Assault Rfile is still effective in short to mid and mid to long distances. Imagine how much more accurate it'll be when they fix the aiming system and hit detection. No need for snipers (no not including red zone, but the real support snipers that help out). The assault rifle is more deadlier than even the mass driver. The assault rifle holds the most advantages over any gun. No troll just simply reply yes or no that the assault rifle has the most advantages over any gun. Not saying it's OP but saying that it's the most effective weapon in the game in almost all situations. Yes or No people. Keep the debates clean and please if you're going to debate make sure you have a strong point.
Yes:
Me
NO:
LOL! |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers
EoN.
904
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Yes it's OP. It has no real downsides and far too many upsides.
The only reason not to use the AR is if you don't want to be an AR crutch wielder.
LMFAO!!!!!! |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers
EoN.
907
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 20:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Csikszent Mihalyi wrote:Buster Friently wrote:Csikszent Mihalyi wrote:
Or another way to look at it is this: If you have a battle between 32 snipers, forge guns, or mass drivers, the gameplay is going to suck (not everyone will agree with this...). A battle between 32 ARs is going to be just fine, whether you find it boring or not. That's why it is the default weapon for most people, and will always be the most common choice.
So no, I can't give you a yes or no answer because you are not asking the right question.
To me, what you describe as "fine" gameplay is the entire problem. That's the epitome of brainless, no tactics lowbrow FPS. I hope Dust never even comes close to this. Specialised weapons enrich the game and spice things up. But as a foundation of core gameplay mechanics, they are unsuitable. If any weapon is so bad that you hardly ever see it on the battlefield, then that's a pity and something to be rectified (hello plasma cannon). But complaining that the AR is the most used and most effective weapon in general is pointless. One weapon has to fill that role, and it better be one that makes for good gameplay. A battle between 32 mass drivers would not be any more tactical than a battle between 32 ARs. It would be a bloody mess. I agree with this. It's diversity that's important. We don't have that now. The AR, in pub matches, amounts to kills almost equivalent to 11 of the total 14 weapons combined. So, this is the exact problem you describe. Most weapons are being far underused in favor of the OP AR. It's be one thing if the AR, was say, used as much as two or three other weapons combined, but it isn't. It's used as much, or almost, as eleven of them combined. Sad.
You must get owned a lot to have this delusional vision of the AR. |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers
EoN.
908
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 20:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
echo47 wrote:no.
OP compared to what? All of the other rifles are not in the game yet.
They are comparing it to the MassDriver. They say MassDriver requires tons of skill, dead on accuracy, and much strategy to use compared to the Assault Rifle. |
|
|
| |
|