|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION
RISE of LEGION
521
   |
Posted - 2013.08.10 08:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am very happy with the idea of removing War Barge strikes in FW and PC matches. This is something I have been talking to people about and I know this will make many people very happy.
EVE players earning the strike made EVE players I was talking to very happy, and me as an EVE player and DUST player very happy as well.
As for who gets the strike, I like the idea of giving it to everyone. If it makes the veteran players get upset, oh well. Us vets tend to have things going our way anyway. Give the guys in FW the fun of scrambling for a strike, while the PC matches will look even more appealing due to the organization required and actively taking place. |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION
RISE of LEGION
521
|
Posted - 2013.08.10 08:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:IFor Eve side get kill mails as well and have LP scale with the value destroyed?
In far future with Crest power I would like to see a miniature map pulled up for Eve players of the battle going on with icons and being able to lock a site on his own for a strike based on his team's intel or in a far much longer interval his own scanning tools.
and orbital EWAR support make it happen.
Tactical ECM - Jams hostile's tacnet in affected area over a period of time. Translucent Static field storm effect in area
Tactical Dampener - Lowers hostiles tacnet in affected area over a period of time. Pulsing downward rings surrounding the area.
Tactical Painter - Massively pings hostile positions in affected area over a period of time. Red Tinted area
Tactical Web - Slows vehicle movement down in affected area over a period of time. Heat Effect near ground with weak electrical current that only gets stronger if a vehicle enters the area effected.
I love these points. EWAR from EVE players would be a huge help indeed. Those of us with strong EVE sides should be able to provide a bonus to those on the ground.
Also, EVE players really need killmails for the damage they do on the ground. It is hardly nothing in terms of ISK destroyed, but it would be nice to see it up on the killboards. Showing the ISK destroyed in DUST and how much you hurt the guys on the ground would be great fun. Having a history of killing ground troops would be fun for an EVE pilot. |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION
RISE of LEGION
525
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
Getting rid of the War Barge strike is an obviously good idea. Making it something that goes to those that both with having a link with EVE is a far better reward than giving it to the team that is winning. Having air superiority matter, so why not orbital superiority? |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION
RISE of LEGION
525
|
Posted - 2013.08.19 06:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
I am shocked anyone is against this idea at all. |
SILENTSAM 69
SONS of LEGION
RISE of LEGION
541
|
Posted - 2013.09.09 22:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Quote:The three things I am most interested in hearing about are:
What do you think about removing war barge strikes from FW and PC?
What do you think about EVE players earning the orbital strike?
What do you think about who should earn calling in the orbital strike?
That of course does not mean don't discuss other things relating to orbital strikes, but I would prefer to keep that discussion focused around those 3 points.
So please, let us know what you think.
Removing the NPC strike is not only a good idea, but something DUST really badly needs when it comes to PC mode.
Having EVE players earn the strikes is a good diea. It is boring just sitting up there without anything to do. It is currently quite easy to warp in a small fleet, place a strike and warp out. Having the pilots orbit a beacon or something to earn the strike, and continue to earn more will make the game play more interesting in EVE, and allow for more actual combat.
I almost think the EVE player should decide which squad leader to give it to. Let them decide over comms. The in game voice comms work fine, and so does third party software many of us use already.
That said this is less important, and can be done many different ways. |
|
|
| |
|