|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Killar-12
Molon Labe.
League of Infamy
435
   |
Posted - 2013.08.08 01:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
843 Epidemic wrote:1) Mass Drivers
2) Core locus Grenades
3) Flux grenades
4) Core flaylocks
5) Ishukone assault forge guns
Just putting it out there, are any corporations interested in gun game anymore or is this all it comes to? These 5 weapons is all I see in PC battles and it kind of sucks, I get they all have their tactical advantages and things like grenades and forge guns are fair game.
But, well idk I'm sure it seems all 'QQ' to you forum warriors out there but it just gets boring, I find it hard to get into a good 1 on 1 in a PC match because I see a freedom mass driver coming at my gallante ass and I'm like "Well game over". There's not much I can do, considering I only am at 9.5 million SP and I'm faced with Proto mass drivers 90% of the time.
I just ringed for Valor coalition against Synergy, and GG to both teams you all played well but, damn it all I was faced against was mass drivers, forge gunners, and Mavado's tank ofc xD
What happened to good gunfights? Do they just not matter any more?
- BANE
Explosive damage is broke so...
Ishkones don't seem that bad if your team has a thale on the field.
Armor Tanking is Broke
Fluxes aren't too bad, they require another weapon to kill the enemy.
MD's and Flaylocks suck at long range and firing upwards.
Good Gunfights? What outstrafing? |
Killar-12
Molon Labe.
League of Infamy
439
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 16:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
Moochie Cricket wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Medical Crash wrote:Zatara Rought wrote:I hate getting killed by Forges, Massdrivers, Flaylocks, and Murder Taxi's. Anything else takes at least feels fine to die from.
Not saying forge's don't take some skill....points. But It sucks to be kamehameha'd by militia forge's. Best thing I heard all day...my CEO agreeing that forge's shouldn't do damage to infantry, same way swarms don't. No. FG should be left as is, nothing wrong with them. I don't think there is either. It's just that people don't want to take the time to get rid of them. They are certainly a pain in the ass. Small range nerf would be nice
or Pulling out a sniper rifle. |
Killar-12
Molon Labe.
League of Infamy
441
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aquinarius Zoltanus wrote:Seriously what is with all these calls for specific 'rule of engagement', otherwise you're not honorable. I understood the agreement not to use the pre-nerf flaylock because it was so ubiquitous and obviously broken, but this is getting to be ridiculous.
Unless we get another weapon that is on the pre-nerf flaylock or pre-nerf TAR level of broken-ness (hint: we do not have one currently), then can we just agree to play our best with whatever weapons or tactics we choose? Just play to the best of your ability and see who wins?
Thank you... |
Killar-12
Molon Labe.
League of Infamy
442
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:20:00 -
[4] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:Aquinarius Zoltanus wrote:Seriously what is with all these calls for specific 'rule of engagement', otherwise you're not honorable. I understood the agreement not to use the pre-nerf flaylock because it was so ubiquitous and obviously broken, but this is getting to be ridiculous.
Unless we get another weapon that is on the pre-nerf flaylock or pre-nerf TAR level of broken-ness (hint: we do not have one currently), then can we just agree to play our best with whatever weapons or tactics we choose? Just play to the best of your ability and see who wins? Shhh don't say that. People might start crying. +1 It seems like PC has turned into a list of these rules that are set up by people who start losing. It seems like people just want to use ARs and HMGs in PC battles. People hate diversity
Just like in real life people hate those who are different. |
|
|
| |
|